DevelopmentMobile DevelopmentLos AngelesAndroid App Development
Los Angeles / Android App Development

Best Android App Development Companies in Los Angeles (2026)

30 agencies are ranked on documented android app development work: 6 based in or serving Los Angeles and 24 from other cities, marked as such; 6 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 30 Mobile Development agencies for android app development in Los Angeles, 6 of them local: the ones with documented android app development work on file, verified through June 2026. The top three by evidence-weighted score are Urban Insight (64/100), Simpalm (59) and AppMakersLA (59). No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 26 Los Angeles Mobile Development agencies have no android app development claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1Urban Insight 64 · From $8,500/month · clients 5.0/5 (3)4 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 0 first-party, 3 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  2. 2Simpalm 59 · price not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (10)10 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 9 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites
  3. 3AppMakersLA 59 · price not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (91)3 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites

Budget in Los Angeles: disclosed monthly floors run from $20 to $8,500, median $2,650; 5 of 30 disclose a price.

30 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
ForPays
1
Urban Insight logo

Urban Insight

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 10-49 · since 2000

HQ in Los Angeles · From $8,500/month · clients 5.0/5 (3) 1 documented

…site as the data source, replacing the museum's separate native Android and iOS apps. (Independent source, pantheon.io)

Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

64/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
2S

Simpalm

Chicago, IL, USA · team 51-200 · since 2009

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (10) 1 documented

Guiulianna Cespedes, Founder of Quynza, reviewed Simpalm's work on an Android app, writing that the finished app runs smoothly and gave the company a… (Independent source, selectedfirms.co)

Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.

59/100
Confidence not rated yet
Not verified
View profile
3
AppMakersLA logo

AppMakersLA

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 60 · since 2014

HQ in Los Angeles · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (91) 1 documented

…The client reported successful App Store and Google Play acceptance and a smooth launch. (Independent source, selectedfirms.co)

Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.

59/100
Confidence not rated yet
Not verified
View profile
4
Ripe Media logo

Ripe Media

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 10-49 · since 2003

HQ in Los Angeles · From $5,000/month · clients 5.0/5 (6) Agency's own published cases

Ripe Media updated the website and created a hybrid iOS and Android app for the SAG-AFTRA Foundation's Storyline Online children's literacy program… (Agency's own words, ripemedia.com)

No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

59/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
5
Frenchy Digital logo

Frenchy Digital

Los Angeles, CA, USA · since 2016

HQ in Los Angeles · Projects from $20,000 · clients 3.8/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

For LIVV Audio, Frenchy Digital built native mobile apps in Swift for iOS and Kotlin for Android with feature parity between the two platforms. (Agency's own words, frenchydigital.com)

No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

53/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
6DI

d1g.it

Phoenix, AZ, USA · team One · since 2009

national coverage · From $20/month Agency's own published cases

For Italian Essence, d1git built a Laravel website with wholesale ordering and an Android app used by drivers to run deliveries. No result or result… (Agency's own words, d1g.it)

No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
7
TechnBrains logo

TechnBrains

New York, NY, USA · since 2013

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (28) 1 documented

A reviewer named Brian Williams left a five-star Google review stating that TechnBrains built a bug-free, feature-rich Android app for his business based… (Independent source, reviews.ratingcaptain.com)

Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.

45/100
Confidence not rated yet
Not verified
View profile
8
JumpGrowth logo

JumpGrowth

Dallas, TX, USA · team 51-200 · since 2018

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.4/5 (5) 1 documented

A client hired JumpGrowth for Android app development in 2021 for a food delivery app and says the company made her ideal come to life, with help… (Independent source, crowdreviews.com)

Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.

43/100
Confidence not rated yet
Not verified
View profile
9
Messapps logo

Messapps

New York, NY, USA

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.8/5 (6) Agency's own published cases

…and its listed services include iPhone App Development, Android App Development, Web Development, Mobile App Marketing and UI Design. (Independent source, crowdreviews.com)

Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.

43/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
10
Appluex logo

Appluex

Miami, USA

national coverage · From $299/month Agency's own published cases

Appluex built the AgResource iOS and Android app, which delivers market commentary and farm marketing advice through a Daily Newsletter, Weekly… (Agency's own words, appluex.com)

No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

43/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
127 more agencies considered without externally confirmed android app development work, 26 of them serving Los Angeles

This is an absence of evidence, not a quality rating.

One sourced claim moves an agency into the ranking.

No android app development claim on file yet. (65)

Only Vendar profile tags name android app development; no outside source on file yet. (61)

Sources on file say the vendor offers android app development; no case study or client review documents the work yet. (1)

Frequently asked questions (6)
How many Los Angeles Mobile Development agencies have documented android app development work?
6 of the 32 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in Los Angeles have at least one android app development claim on file under the published rubric, and 24 more from other cities join the ranking with documented android app development work; 6 of the 30 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 6 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 26 Los Angeles agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which Los Angeles android app development agency fits my type of business?
By the clients named in their documented android app development work: Shops, restaurants and retail: Zimble Code (#18). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does android app development cost in Los Angeles?
Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $20/month and the median floor is $2,650/month. 5 of 30 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?
1 of 30 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified. The lowest disclosed floor among verified agencies is Urban Insight at $8,500/month.
How is this list different from the Los Angeles Mobile Development page?
The Los Angeles Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with android app development evidence on file, scores them on the android app development query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
The newest profile verification among ranked agencies is June 2, 2026; the newest evidence claim was checked on November 3, 2026. Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓
D1Full ranking table30 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1Urban Insight6418.8251.57.2101.500.84/1Jun 2, 2026
2Simpalm5927.510.3107.22.52.61.3-2n/a10/1Not verified
3AppMakersLA5919198.87.22.54.80-2n/a3/1Not verified
4Ripe Media5914.821.537.2102.100.84/0Not verified
5Frenchy Digital5311228.57.250.90-20.82/0Not verified
6d1g.it471216.29.27.27.500-50.82/0Not verified
7TechnBrains45206.88.37.203.31.3-2n/a2/1Not verified
8JumpGrowth43206.88.362.51.70-2n/a2/1Not verified
9Messapps432010.39.23020-20.82/1Not verified
10Appluex431116.28.63501.3-20.82/0Not verified
11Idea Maker436198.17.22.52.10-20.81/0Not verified
12Trango Tech40815.98.47.22.500-20.81/0Not verified
13The Hashtech391210.311.232.51.50-20.89/0Not verified
14Logo Invention3815.86.810.4304.40-20.86/0Not verified
15BitsWits37810.387.22.52.70-20.81/0Not verified
16Appingine36810.37.77.22.51.31.3-20.81/0Not verified
17TekRevol36810.37.962.53.20-20.81/0Not verified
18Zimble Code341510.310.33000-50.84/0Not verified
19AOX Apps33910.39.832.50.80-20.82/0Not verified
20AppCrops33910.38.132.52.10-20.82/0Not verified
21Apptunix33810.37.932.53.10-20.81/0Not verified
22Appsters32126.89.3302.80-20.82/0Not verified
23SDSol Technologies32610.38.632.53.40-20.81/0Not verified
24Go Tech Solutions30910.38.4300.80-20.82/0Not verified
25New York App Devs29810.38301.20-20.81/0Not verified
26Vincit2986.87.8301.93.8-20.81/0Not verified
27Emerline29610.38.37.22.500-50.81/0Not verified
28Marotino27610.3832.51.90-50.81/0Not verified
29Kreante2666.87.94.82.500-20.81/0Not verified
30SFCD2386.810.23000-50.81/0Not verified

Pool 32 · ranked 30 · unranked 127 (61 with profile tags only) · verified 1 · pricing disclosed 5 · case studies on file 2 · an outside source names the work 6 · an outside document describes it 6 · lowest verified floor Urban Insight $8,500/month

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 Urban Insight64/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Confirmed by an independent source · headquarters in the city · From $8,500/month · hourly $150-$199/hr · projects from $50,000 · 195 claims on file

Evidence for this query18.8/300.6254 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 0 first-party, 3 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Urban Insight developed a Progressive Web App with Gatsby for The Broad, using the Drupal site as the data source, replacing the museum's… (pantheon.io, verified)
Fit to this query25/251Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Retainers from $8,500/month, inside the android app development band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth1.5/150.09911 of 75 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 195 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2000; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $8,500/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation1.5/50.3013 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Urban Insight developed a Progressive Web App with Gatsby for The Broad, using the Drupal site as the data source, replacing the museum's separate native Android and iOS apps.

    Independent source · pantheon.io · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1.2 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Editorial use case: Los Angeles buyers comparing mobile app development teams across iOS app development, Android app development, cross-platform app development, mobile MVP development, mobile backend and API integration, app launch, modernization, and support..

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.4 · checked Jun 2, 2026

  • Editorial use case: Los Angeles shortlist fit for Mobile Development: iOS App Development, Android App Development, React Native Development, Flutter Development, Cross-platform App Development..

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.4 · checked Jun 2, 2026

  • Listed service on Vendar: Android App Development.

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.3 · checked Jun 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Web development, Drupal development, Website redesign

#2 Simpalm59/100 · Confidence not rated yet

Confirmed by an independent source · national coverage · price not disclosed · 76 claims on file

Evidence for this query27.5/300.915999999999999910 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 9 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; Guiulianna Cespedes, Founder of Quynza, reviewed Simpalm's work on an Android app, writing that the finished app runs smoothly and gave… (selectedfirms.co, verified); Simpalm reproduced AudiobooksNow's apps for native Android and iOS, which the client calls a breakthrough, delivering mobile applications… (simpalm.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Los Angeles from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth10/150.6641 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 10 of 76 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2009; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation2.6/50.5110 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per selectedfirms.co; Sources: selectedfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Guiulianna Cespedes, Founder of Quynza, reviewed Simpalm's work on an Android app, writing that the finished app runs smoothly and gave the company a stronger mobile presence on Android.

    Independent source · selectedfirms.co · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1.2 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Simpalm reproduced AudiobooksNow's apps for native Android and iOS, which the client calls a breakthrough, delivering mobile applications on tight timelines at competitive pricing.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Bryan Stafford, President of AudiobooksNow, says Simpalm reproduced their apps for native Android and iOS and delivers mobile applications on tight timelines at competitive pricing.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Simpalm reproduced AudiobooksNow's apps for native Android and iOS; the client reports being extremely happy with the service and deliverables, citing delivery of mobile applications on tight timelines at competitive pricing.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Simpalm developed an iOS and Android application for Collabri App, a peer-to-peer platform for small gigs.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Simpalm designed and developed full-scale mobile apps and web applications for the University of Maryland, College Park's Together Program, building native iOS and Android apps.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Simpalm designed and developed full-scale mobile apps and web applications for the University of Maryland's Together Program, with native iOS and Android apps that families use to follow workshop coursework.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Simpalm developed an iOS and Android application for Collabri, a peer-to-peer platform where users can post work they want done and skilled users can post ads for services they offer.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Simpalm designed and developed full-scale mobile apps and web applications for the University of Maryland, College Park's Together Program under the Department of Family Science, with native iOS and Android apps used by families to follow workshop coursework.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Simpalm developed iOS and Android apps for the Together Program of the University of Maryland, College Park's Department of Family Science, using a native approach, which families in the program use to follow workshop coursework.

    Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 9 reviews; Trustpilot 3.7 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#3 AppMakersLA59/100 · Confidence not rated yet

Confirmed by an independent source · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 42 claims on file

Evidence for this query19/300.6333 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; AppMakers USA transformed an existing intimacy-app concept into a launch-ready mobile product for Moon Me Lover. The client reported… (selectedfirms.co, verified); AppMakers shipped Number Hive as native iOS and Android apps alongside a web build; the product later consolidated onto its web platform… (appmakersla.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth8.8/150.5891 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 42 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2014; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 60; Process not documented
Reputation4.8/50.962000000000000191 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • AppMakers USA transformed an existing intimacy-app concept into a launch-ready mobile product for Moon Me Lover. The client reported successful App Store and Google Play acceptance and a smooth launch.

    Independent source · selectedfirms.co · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • AppMakers shipped Number Hive as native iOS and Android apps alongside a web build; the product later consolidated onto its web platform, which serves 700,000+ students with no install required.

    Agency's own words · appmakersla.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • AppMakers shipped Number Hive as native iOS and Android apps alongside a web build.

    Agency's own words · appmakersla.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 80 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 11 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#4 Ripe Media59/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · From $5,000/month · 107 claims on file

Evidence for this query14.8/300.4924 android app development claims on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 3 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Ripe Media updated the website and created a hybrid iOS and Android app for the SAG-AFTRA Foundation's Storyline Online children's… (ripemedia.com, claimed)
Fit to this query21.5/250.86Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Retainers from $5,000/month, inside the android app development band
Capability depth3/150.1997 of 23 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 107 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2003; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $5,000/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation2.1/50.4236 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Ripe Media updated the website and created a hybrid iOS and Android app for the SAG-AFTRA Foundation's Storyline Online children's literacy program, developing an easy-to-update framework to expand the program's offerings and outreach.

    Agency's own words · ripemedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Editorial use case: Los Angeles buyers comparing mobile app development teams across iOS app development, Android app development, cross-platform app development, mobile MVP development, mobile backend and API integration, app launch, modernization, and support..

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.4 · checked Jun 2, 2026

  • Editorial use case: Los Angeles shortlist fit for Mobile Development: iOS App Development, Android App Development, Mobile App Modernization, Mobile App Maintenance and Support, Mobile Backend and API Integration..

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.4 · checked Jun 2, 2026

  • Listed service on Vendar: Android App Development.

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.3 · checked Jun 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 6 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Digital strategy, SEO support, Case-study-led web growth

#5 Frenchy Digital53/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · Projects from $20,000 · projects from $20,000 · 39 claims on file

Evidence for this query11/300.3672 android app development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; For LIVV Audio, Frenchy Digital built native mobile apps in Swift for iOS and Kotlin for Android with feature parity between the two… (frenchydigital.com, claimed); Frenchy Digital developed the LIVV Audio app, an end-to-end Bluetooth Low Energy audio platform for controlling premium headphones… (frenchydigital.com, claimed)
Fit to this query22/250.88Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Projects from $20,000; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.5/150.5641 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 39 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2016; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (Projects from $20,000); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0.9/50.1812 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • For LIVV Audio, Frenchy Digital built native mobile apps in Swift for iOS and Kotlin for Android with feature parity between the two platforms.

    Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

  • Frenchy Digital developed the LIVV Audio app, an end-to-end Bluetooth Low Energy audio platform for controlling premium headphones, spanning iOS and Android apps, a cloud backend, and an enterprise admin dashboard.

    Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

#6 d1g.it47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $20/month · 22 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 android app development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; For Italian Essence, d1git built a Laravel website with wholesale ordering and an Android app used by drivers to run deliveries. No result… (d1g.it, claimed); d1git built an Italian Essence wholesale-ordering site and an Android app used by the drivers for deliveries. (d1g.it, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Los Angeles from Phoenix, AZ, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $20/month, inside the android app development band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth9.2/150.6141 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 22 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2009; Retention not documented
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed (From $20/month); Team size One; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: No independent source on file -3 (Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.); Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • For Italian Essence, d1git built a Laravel website with wholesale ordering and an Android app used by drivers to run deliveries. No result or result period is stated.

    Agency's own words · d1g.it · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

  • d1git built an Italian Essence wholesale-ordering site and an Android app used by the drivers for deliveries.

    Agency's own words · d1g.it · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

#7 TechnBrains45/100 · Confidence not rated yet

Confirmed by an independent source · national coverage · price not disclosed · 48 claims on file

Evidence for this query20/300.6672 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; A reviewer named Brian Williams left a five-star Google review stating that TechnBrains built a bug-free, feature-rich Android app for his… (reviews.ratingcaptain.com, verified); TechnBrains built the Whitetail Almanac hunting app for Hunter's Edge, providing design and prototyping, development, maintenance, and… (technbrains.com, claimed)
Fit to this query6.8/250.27Serves Los Angeles from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth8.3/150.5521 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 48 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2013; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation3.3/50.657999999999999928 third-party reviews at 4.5
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per truefirms.co; Sources: truefirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • A reviewer named Brian Williams left a five-star Google review stating that TechnBrains built a bug-free, feature-rich Android app for his business based on his idea.

    Independent source · reviews.ratingcaptain.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1.2 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • TechnBrains built the Whitetail Almanac hunting app for Hunter's Edge, providing design and prototyping, development, maintenance, and cloud support for a hybrid iOS and Android app built with React Native on a LEMP stack with Laravel.

    Agency's own words · technbrains.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.7 from 13 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 15 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#8 JumpGrowth43/100 · Confidence not rated yet

Confirmed by an independent source · national coverage · price not disclosed · 49 claims on file

Evidence for this query20/300.6672 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; A client hired JumpGrowth for Android app development in 2021 for a food delivery app and says the company made her ideal come to life… (crowdreviews.com, verified); The vendor built VowTimer, an iOS and Android app that lets wedding guests connect before the ceremony and bet on how long the ceremony… (jumpgrowth.com, claimed)
Fit to this query6.8/250.27Serves Los Angeles from Dallas, TX, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth8.3/150.5511 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 49 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability6/100.6In business since 2018; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation1.7/50.3425 third-party reviews at 4.4
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • A client hired JumpGrowth for Android app development in 2021 for a food delivery app and says the company made her ideal come to life, with help transitioning into entrepreneurship.

    Independent source · crowdreviews.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1.2 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The vendor built VowTimer, an iOS and Android app that lets wedding guests connect before the ceremony and bet on how long the ceremony will take, using React Native, Node.js, Angular, NGINX and MongoDB.

    Agency's own words · jumpgrowth.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#9 Messapps43/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 22 claims on file

Evidence for this query20/300.6672 android app development claims on file: 1 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; Messapps is a mobile app development company in New York, NY, founded in 2013 with 11-25 employees, and its listed services include iPhone… (crowdreviews.com, verified); Cakemix is presented in Messapps' work as a fitness app with beat-based playlists; the page describes Messapps as an iOS and Android app… (messapps.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Los Angeles from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9.2/150.6141 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 22 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation2/50.4066 third-party reviews at 4.8
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Messapps is a mobile app development company in New York, NY, founded in 2013 with 11-25 employees, and its listed services include iPhone App Development, Android App Development, Web Development, Mobile App Marketing and UI Design.

    Independent source · crowdreviews.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1.2 · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Cakemix is presented in Messapps' work as a fitness app with beat-based playlists; the page describes Messapps as an iOS and Android app development company.

    Agency's own words · messapps.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 5 reviews; Trustpilot 3.7 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#10 Appluex43/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $299/month · hourly $150 an hour · 34 claims on file

Evidence for this query11/300.3672 android app development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Appluex built the AgResource iOS and Android app, which delivers market commentary and farm marketing advice through a Daily Newsletter… (appluex.com, claimed); The AgResource app built by Appluex is listed on the App Store with a 4.6-star rating and on Google Play with a 4.7-star rating. (appluex.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Los Angeles from Miami, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $299/month, inside the android app development band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.6/150.5741 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 34 claims on file concern android app development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (From $299/month); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names android app development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Appluex built the AgResource iOS and Android app, which delivers market commentary and farm marketing advice through a Daily Newsletter, Weekly Newsletter, and Plus+ Reports based on exclusive research in real time.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The AgResource app built by Appluex is listed on the App Store with a 4.6-star rating and on Google Play with a 4.7-star rating.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Positions 11 to 30: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.11

A claim counts as Android evidence when a source on file names an Android phone, tablet or Wear OS app the company built or rebuilt, native work in Kotlin, Java for Android or Jetpack Compose, or a Google Play release, ideally with the client named. A Google Play listing counts only when it names the company as the developer; user ratings of an app are not client reviews of the company.

Terms that count:
android app, android apps, android application, kotlin, jetpack compose, google play, play store, android development, native android, wear os
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names android app development work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports android app development under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
Android App Development 2026.11
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/development/mobile-development/los-angeles/android-app-development

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring