How many Los Angeles Mobile Development agencies have documented react native development work?

5 of the 32 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in Los Angeles have at least one react native development claim on file under the published rubric, and 19 more from other cities join the ranking with documented react native development work; 0 of the 24 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 0 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 27 Los Angeles agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.

Which of them have worked for clients in Los Angeles?

1 of the 24 ranked agencies have documented react native development work for a client in Los Angeles: Frenchy Digital (#1, Los Angeles). The others are ranked on work for clients elsewhere.

Which Los Angeles react native development agency fits my type of business?

By the clients named in their documented react native development work: Dental, medical and wellness: Frenchy Digital (#1), Disrupt Labs (#3) and New York App Devs (#10); Shops, restaurants and retail: iQlance Solutions (#6). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.

What does react native development cost in Los Angeles?

Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $299/month and the median floor is $299/month. 2 of 24 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.

How is this list different from the Los Angeles Mobile Development page?

The Los Angeles Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with react native development evidence on file, scores them on the react native development query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.

When was this list updated?

Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.

DevelopmentMobile Development Los AngelesReact Native Development

Los Angeles / React Native Development

Best React Native Development Companies in Los Angeles (2026)

24 agencies are ranked on documented react native development work: 5 based in or serving Los Angeles and 19 from other cities, marked as such; 0 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3

1Frenchy Digital 55 · Projects from $20,000 · clients 3.8/5 (2)2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
2AppMakersLA 52 · price not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (91)2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
3Disrupt Labs 47 · price not disclosed5 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in Los Angeles: disclosed monthly floors run from $299, median $299; 2 of 24 disclose a price.

24 ranked agencies

BudgetSort

ForPays

Frenchy Digital

Los Angeles, CA, USA · since 2016

HQ in Los Angeles · Projects from $20,000 · clients 3.8/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification, achieving a 65% 30-day retention rate versus a 25% industry average on iOS and Androi… (Agency's own words, frenchydigital.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

55/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

AppMakersLA

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 60 · since 2014

HQ in Los Angeles · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (91) Agency's own published cases

AppMakers USA built the ASL Flurry American Sign Language learning app for iOS, Android, and web from a single React Native Web codebase, with shared UI… (Agency's own words, appmakersla.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

52/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Disrupt Labs

Los Angeles, CA, USA · since 2018

HQ in Los Angeles · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

Disrupt Labs documents React Native work for 360Health: a unified healthcare CRM for patients and healthcare professionals to share data in real time. (Agency's own words, disruptlabs.xyz)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Simpalm

Chicago, IL, USA · team 51-200 · since 2009

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (10) Agency's own published cases

Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on a… (Agency's own words, simpalm.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

AppVerticals

Los Angeles, CA, USA

HQ in Los Angeles · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.8/5 (104) Agency's own published cases

AppVerticals built a 92-screen B2B commerce and account management platform in React Native for Coca-Cola's UAE trade channel, launched with 2M+ peak… (Agency's own words, appverticals.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

46/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

iQlance Solutions

New York, NY, USA · team 51-200 · since 2010

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.7/5 (10) Agency's own published cases

iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from idea to launch in 8 months in Dallas… (Agency's own words, iqlance.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

45/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Softaims

Chicago, USA · team 500+

national coverage · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

…sync, adaptive payloads, and Hermes-optimized parsing with React Native, Hermes engine, SQLite, and Redux. Sync latency was reduced from 12 seconds to 180 milliseconds (-98.5% faster)… (Agency's own words, softaims.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

44/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Appluex

Miami, USA

national coverage · From $299/month Agency's own published cases

Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB. (Agency's own words, appluex.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

44/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

Appingine

Chicago, USA · team 200+ · since 2005

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 3.8/5 (4) Agency's own published cases

Appingine built Fitvate, a personalized workout and training app using React Native and Google Fit API, with 3.5M+ downloads globally, a 60% increase in… (Agency's own words, appingine.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

42/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

New York App Devs

New York, NY, USA

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

Senthora AI: …real-time voice tutoring, built for iOS and Android using React Native, with results of 70-90% lower cost and seconds response time. (Agency's own words, newyorkappdevs.com)

No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

41/100

Moderate confidence

Not verified

View profile

Compare

133 more agencies considered without externally confirmed react native development work, 27 of them serving Los Angeles

This is an absence of evidence, not a quality rating.

One sourced claim moves an agency into the ranking.

No react native development claim on file yet. (104)

Only Vendar profile tags name react native development; no outside source on file yet. (28)

Sources on file say the vendor offers react native development; no case study or client review documents the work yet. (1)

Bolder Appsprice n/a

Frequently asked questions (7)

How many Los Angeles Mobile Development agencies have documented react native development work?: 5 of the 32 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in Los Angeles have at least one react native development claim on file under the published rubric, and 19 more from other cities join the ranking with documented react native development work; 0 of the 24 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 0 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 27 Los Angeles agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which of them have worked for clients in Los Angeles?: 1 of the 24 ranked agencies have documented react native development work for a client in Los Angeles: Frenchy Digital (#1, Los Angeles). The others are ranked on work for clients elsewhere.
Which Los Angeles react native development agency fits my type of business?: By the clients named in their documented react native development work: Dental, medical and wellness: Frenchy Digital (#1), Disrupt Labs (#3) and New York App Devs (#10); Shops, restaurants and retail: iQlance Solutions (#6). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does react native development cost in Los Angeles?: Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $299/month and the median floor is $299/month. 2 of 24 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?: 0 of 24 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.
How is this list different from the Los Angeles Mobile Development page?: The Los Angeles Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with react native development evidence on file, scores them on the react native development query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?: Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.

Get my shortlist Machine-readable version All details ↓

All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓

D1Full ranking table24 ranked · click a column to sort

#	Agency	Score	Evid./30	Fit/25	Capab./15	Reliab./10	Transp./10	Reput./5	Cred./5	Pen.	Conf.	Claims	Verified
1	Frenchy Digital	55	13	22	8.5	7.2	5	0.9	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
2	AppMakersLA	52	12	19	8.4	7.2	2.5	4.8	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
3	Disrupt Labs	47	15.5	15.5	15	6	0	0	0	-5	0.8	5/0	Not verified
4	Simpalm	46	15.5	10.3	8.2	7.2	2.5	2.6	1.3	-2	0.8	3/0	Not verified
5	AppVerticals	46	13	19	8.4	3	0	4.8	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
6	iQlance Solutions	45	15	10.3	9.6	7.2	2.5	2.4	0	-2	0.8	4/0	Not verified
7	Softaims	44	16.5	6.8	12.2	3	2.5	3.4	1.3	-2	0.8	4/0	Not verified
8	Appluex	44	12	16.2	8.6	3	5	0	1.3	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
9	Appingine	42	13.5	10.3	8	7.2	2.5	1.3	1.3	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
10	New York App Devs	41	17.5	10.3	10.5	3	0	1.2	0	-2	0.8	6/0	Not verified
11	JumpGrowth	41	15.9	6.8	10.2	6	2.5	1.7	0	-2	0.8	7/0	Not verified
12	KodersPedia	41	15.8	6.8	14.1	3	0	3.2	0	-2	0.8	6/0	Not verified
13	BitsWits	41	12	10.3	8.5	7.2	2.5	2.7	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
14	TechnBrains	39	14	6.8	8.7	7.2	0	3.3	1.3	-2	0.8	3/0	Not verified
15	Apptunix	37	11.2	10.3	8.9	3	2.5	3.1	0	-2	0.8	4/0	Not verified
16	Digipie Technologies	37	8	10.3	8	6.6	2.5	2.7	1.3	-2	0.8	1/0	Not verified
17	TechGropse	36	12	10.3	10	3	0	1.2	1.3	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
18	Sytepoint	36	8	10.3	8.4	7.2	2.5	0	1.3	-2	0.8	1/0	Not verified
19	TekRevol	36	8	10.3	7.9	6	2.5	3.2	0	-2	0.8	1/0	Not verified
20	Go Tech Solutions	35	14	10.3	8.9	3	0	0.8	0	-2	0.8	3/0	Not verified
21	Vincit	34	12	6.8	8.1	3	0	1.9	3.8	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
22	Los Angeles App Devs	33	8	15.5	11.3	3	0	0	0	-5	0.8	1/0	Not verified
23	Software Orca	31	12	6.8	8	3	0	2.8	0	-2	0.8	2/0	Not verified
24	Marotino	29	8	10.3	8	3	2.5	1.9	0	-5	0.8	1/0	Not verified

Pool 32 · ranked 24 · unranked 133 (28 with profile tags only) · verified 0 · pricing disclosed 2 · case studies on file 0 · an outside source names the work 0 · an outside document describes it 0

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position

#1 Frenchy Digital55/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · Projects from $20,000 · projects from $20,000 · 39 claims on file

Evidence for this query	13/30	0.433	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification… (frenchydigital.com, claimed); Frenchy Digital built a React Native app for CGSA Mental Health Clinic, a Los Angeles mental health clinic, with end-to-end encryption… (frenchydigital.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	22/25	0.88	Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Projects from $20,000; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	8.5/15	0.564	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 39 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2016; Retention not documented
Transparency	5/10	0.5	Pricing disclosed (Projects from $20,000); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	0.9/5	0.181	2 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

Frenchy Digital built GoRun, a community-driven React Native running app with live event tracking, social challenges, and gamification, achieving a 65% 30-day retention rate versus a 25% industry average on iOS and Android.
Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026
Frenchy Digital built a React Native app for CGSA Mental Health Clinic, a Los Angeles mental health clinic, with end-to-end encryption, secure messaging, teletherapy integration, and comprehensive patient management features.
Agency's own words · frenchydigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

#2 AppMakersLA52/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 42 claims on file

Evidence for this query	12/30	0.4	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; AppMakers USA built the ASL Flurry American Sign Language learning app for iOS, Android, and web from a single React Native Web codebase… (appmakersla.com, claimed); AppMakers USA built ASL Flurry as a React Native app running on iOS, Android, and web from one codebase, with live multiplayer. (appmakersla.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	19/25	0.76	Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth	8.4/15	0.56	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 42 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2014; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 60; Process not documented
Reputation	4.8/5	0.9620000000000001	91 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

AppMakers USA built the ASL Flurry American Sign Language learning app for iOS, Android, and web from a single React Native Web codebase, with shared UI and business logic and thin native adapters per platform.
Agency's own words · appmakersla.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
AppMakers USA built ASL Flurry as a React Native app running on iOS, Android, and web from one codebase, with live multiplayer.
Agency's own words · appmakersla.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 80 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 11 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#3 Disrupt Labs47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 10 claims on file

Evidence for this query	15.5/30	0.517	5 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Disrupt Labs documents React Native work for 360Health: a unified healthcare CRM for patients and healthcare professionals to share data… (disruptlabs.xyz, claimed); Disrupt Labs built its own game, Disrupt Arcade, with React Native, Unity, and Solana. The game is live on the App Store and includes 7+… (disruptlabs.xyz, claimed)
Fit to this query	15.5/25	0.62	Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth	15/15	1	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 10 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	6/10	0.6	In business since 2018; Retention not documented
Transparency	0/10	0	Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	0/5	0	No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: No independent source on file -3 (Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.); Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

Disrupt Labs documents React Native work for 360Health: a unified healthcare CRM for patients and healthcare professionals to share data in real time.
Agency's own words · disruptlabs.xyz · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Disrupt Labs built its own game, Disrupt Arcade, with React Native, Unity, and Solana. The game is live on the App Store and includes 7+ skill-based games.
Agency's own words · disruptlabs.xyz · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Disrupt Labs lists a portfolio entry for 360Health, described as a unified healthcare CRM built with React Native, Node.js, and AWS, and labeled HIPAA-Ready.
Agency's own words · disruptlabs.xyz · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Disrupt Labs built 360Health, a healthcare CRM mobile app connecting patients, therapists, doctors, trainers, nutritionists, and nurses with real-time shared data, using React Native, Node.js, and AWS. The page labels it client work and describes it as HIPAA-ready.
Agency's own words · disruptlabs.xyz · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
The page identifies 360Health as real work and describes a unified healthcare CRM built with React Native, Node.js, and AWS.
Agency's own words · disruptlabs.xyz · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#4 Simpalm46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 76 claims on file

Evidence for this query	15.5/30	0.517	3 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community… (simpalm.com, claimed); Simpalm built a cross-platform React Native app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community… (simpalm.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	10.3/25	0.41	Serves Los Angeles from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth	8.2/15	0.5489999999999999	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 76 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2009; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation	2.6/5	0.51	10 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility	1.3/5	0.25	1 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per selectedfirms.co; Sources: selectedfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Simpalm built a React Native cross-platform app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on a single platform. 100+ families used the app within the first month of launch, and month-on-month user growth increased by 30%.
Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Simpalm built a cross-platform React Native app for CASSA, an advisory organization, enabling surveys, family communication, and community forums on Android and iOS. 100+ families used the app within the first month of launch, and month-on-month user growth increased by 30%.
Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Simpalm built Android and iOS apps for Collabri, a marketplace connecting service seekers and providers, using React Native. More than 200K jobs were completed in the MVP launch, and total jobs worth $10 million or more have been completed on the apps.
Agency's own words · simpalm.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 9 reviews; Trustpilot 3.7 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#5 AppVerticals46/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 42 claims on file

Evidence for this query	13/30	0.433	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; AppVerticals built a 92-screen B2B commerce and account management platform in React Native for Coca-Cola's UAE trade channel, launched… (appverticals.com, claimed); AppVerticals built a React Native mobile app for service professionals, using one codebase to build and maintain iOS and Android versions. (appverticals.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	19/25	0.76	Headquartered in Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	8.4/15	0.56	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 42 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	3/10	0.3	Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency	0/10	0	Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	4.8/5	0.96	104 third-party reviews at 4.8
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

AppVerticals built a 92-screen B2B commerce and account management platform in React Native for Coca-Cola's UAE trade channel, launched with 2M+ peak users, 99.98% uptime, and zero critical bugs.
Agency's own words · appverticals.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
AppVerticals built a React Native mobile app for service professionals, using one codebase to build and maintain iOS and Android versions.
Agency's own words · appverticals.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 4 reviews; Trustpilot 4.8 from 100 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#6 iQlance Solutions45/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 36 claims on file

Evidence for this query	15/30	0.5	4 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from… (iqlance.com, claimed); iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app; the page lists this project in Dallas, USA with an 8 months… (iqlance.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	10.3/25	0.41	Serves Los Angeles from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	9.6/15	0.639	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 36 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2010; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 51-200; Process not documented
Reputation	2.4/5	0.489	10 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB, taken from idea to launch in 8 months in Dallas, USA.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app; the page lists this project in Dallas, USA with an 8 months idea-to-launch timeline, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS, and Mongo DB.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
iQlance Solutions developed CineVerse, a feature-rich movie streaming app, for a client in Dallas, USA, built with React Native, AWS, Node.JS and Mongo DB and launched 8 months after the initial idea.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
iQlance Solutions built a restaurant app for a client in Houston, USA, using .Net, SQL Server and React Native, launched 10 weeks after the initial idea.
Agency's own words · iqlance.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 7 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#7 Softaims44/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 16 claims on file

Evidence for this query	16.5/30	0.55	4 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Softaims built a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using delta sync, adaptive payloads, and Hermes-optimized… (softaims.com, claimed); Softaims engineered a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using React Native, the Hermes engine, SQLite, Redux… (softaims.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	6.8/25	0.27	Serves Los Angeles from Chicago, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth	12.2/15	0.813	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 16 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	3/10	0.3	Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 500+; Process not documented
Reputation	3.4/5	0.6809999999999999	22 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility	1.3/5	0.25	1 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Softaims built a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using delta sync, adaptive payloads, and Hermes-optimized parsing with React Native, Hermes engine, SQLite, and Redux. Sync latency was reduced from 12 seconds to 180 milliseconds (-98.5% faster), with sub-200ms screen transitions.
Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
Softaims engineered a 16-week offline-first mobile architecture for Trucker Path, using React Native, the Hermes engine, SQLite, Redux, delta sync, and batch API gateways, delivering sub-200ms screen transitions on low-end Android devices. Sync latency was reduced from 12 seconds to 180 milliseconds (-98.5% faster).
Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
Softaims delivered a React Native branded checkout flow with Apple Pay/Google Pay integration, an AWS serverless backend, and privacy-first controls for Owner.com in a 16-week rollout. Checkout latency was reduced from 10 seconds to 800ms (-92 percent).
Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
Softaims delivered a React Native branded checkout flow for Owner.com, integrated Apple Pay and Google Pay, and implemented an AWS serverless backend. Checkout latency decreased from 10 seconds to 800ms (-92 percent).
Agency's own words · softaims.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#8 Appluex44/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $299/month · hourly $150 an hour · 34 claims on file

Evidence for this query	12/30	0.4	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB. (appluex.com, claimed); Appluex built the Glitz mobile app in React Native, using one codebase for both iOS and Android. (appluex.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	16.2/25	0.65	Serves Los Angeles from Miami, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $299/month, inside the react native development band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth	8.6/15	0.574	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 34 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	3/10	0.3	Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency	5/10	0.5	Pricing disclosed (From $299/month); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	0/5	0	No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility	1.3/5	0.25	1 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB.
Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
Appluex built the Glitz mobile app in React Native, using one codebase for both iOS and Android.
Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#9 Appingine42/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 78 claims on file

Evidence for this query	13.5/30	0.45	2 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Appingine built Fitvate, a personalized workout and training app using React Native and Google Fit API, with 3.5M+ downloads globally, a… (appingine.com, claimed); Appingine built the ALDI USA grocery app using React Native, Node.js and AWS, with 10M+ monthly active users on digital platforms, a 45%… (appingine.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	10.3/25	0.41	Serves Los Angeles from Chicago, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names ecommerce clients
Capability depth	8/15	0.532	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 78 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	7.2/10	0.72	In business since 2005; Retention not documented
Transparency	2.5/10	0.25	Pricing not disclosed; Team size 200+; Process not documented
Reputation	1.3/5	0.266	4 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility	1.3/5	0.25	1 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per selectedfirms.co; Sources: selectedfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Appingine built Fitvate, a personalized workout and training app using React Native and Google Fit API, with 3.5M+ downloads globally, a 60% increase in daily active users, and a 4X boost in user engagement through gamification.
Agency's own words · appingine.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
Appingine built the ALDI USA grocery app using React Native, Node.js and AWS, with 10M+ monthly active users on digital platforms, a 45% increase in online orders, and a 30% faster checkout experience.
Agency's own words · appingine.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 3.4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#10 New York App Devs41/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 38 claims on file

Evidence for this query	17.5/30	0.583	6 react native development claims on file: 0 third-party, 6 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The page presents a case study for Senthora AI, an EdTech app described as real-time voice tutoring, built for iOS and Android using React… (newyorkappdevs.com, claimed); New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor React Native app for iOS and Android, for an EdTech client; the page states it reached… (newyorkappdevs.com, claimed)
Fit to this query	10.3/25	0.41	Serves Los Angeles from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names healthcare clients
Capability depth	10.5/15	0.6970000000000001	1 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 6 of 38 claims on file concern react native development
Reliability	3/10	0.3	Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency	0/10	0	Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation	1.2/5	0.239	2 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility	0/5	0	No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

The page presents a case study for Senthora AI, an EdTech app described as real-time voice tutoring, built for iOS and Android using React Native, with results of 70-90% lower cost and seconds response time.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor React Native app for iOS and Android, for an EdTech client; the page states it reached 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
New York App Devs documents a React Native app built for Teacher AI, reporting 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026
New York App Devs built Decima, a React Native healthcare app with HIPAA-compliant architecture and 40+ Apple Health biomarkers synced.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
The page states the vendor built Decima, a voice AI health coaching app on iOS with React Native, to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026
New York App Devs says it built Decima, a voice AI health coaching app on iOS with React Native, to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards from day one.
Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Positions 11 to 24: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.11

A claim counts as React Native evidence when a source on file names an app the company built, rebuilt or maintains in React Native or Expo, ideally with the client and the platforms it shipped on. A technology listed on the company's services page without a project does not count.

Terms that count:: react native, expo
Minimum to be ranked:: 1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:: no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names react native development work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports react native development under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted

Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions

Data as of: Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check: Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated: Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model: Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric: React Native Development 2026.11
Update cadence: Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by: Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.

D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/development/mobile-development/los-angeles/react-native-development

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring

Other Los Angeles Mobile Development scenarios

All Mobile Development iOS App Development Android App Development Flutter Development Mobile MVP Development Mobile App Modernization Mobile Backend and API Integration

React Native Development in other cities

New York Chicago Miami Houston