Ranks in the top three, and most of its claims match the sources they cite, but the record lacks one thing a decision needs; the agency can add it through the claim form, and the verdict updates with the data. None of its 34 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Missing: a published price with a unit (monthly floor, project minimum or hourly rate). Correct the data about this company
Best position #2 React Native Development in New York, of 24 · also in 31 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/52 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 50% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 100% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise the agency for its professionalism, clear communication, and high-quality app development. Many highlight the team's responsiveness and ability to deliver on schedule, with one client noting an MVP shipped in nine weeks. No negative feedback appears in the reviews.More
- Communication4
- Quality3
- Responsiveness2
- Professionalism2
- Speed2
“communication was top-notch”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“high-quality mobile apps”
“responsive, quick to review my feedback”
“They are professional”
“shipped our MVP in nine weeks”
No criticism in the 2 reviews read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- Mobile app development2
- App development1
- MVP development1
- Independent Freelancer
- Legal Technology Firm
Show 6 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Their approach to managing the project was instrumental in achieving our objectives on schedule and within budget. E Executive Glamly Mobile app for iOS & Android”
““They provided excellent service, and their communication was top-notch.” Viki Arslanian Independent Freelancer”
“★★★★★ “They offered impressive value for money.” J Jan van der Aa CEO · Teacher AI”
“They shipped our MVP in nine weeks and it looked like a Series-B product. Our investors noticed.”
“They had great personnel and were responsive, quick to review my feedback, and quick to develop implementation plans.”
““Executive” Glamly Their approach to managing the project was instrumental in achieving our objectives on schedule and within budget.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (healthcares, educations, retails) and the industries on file (media, insurance).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Mobile app development (2 of 4 mentions); App development (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 34 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 15 of 15 results with a number do not say what year they were measured.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a React Native Development case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #1 iQlance Solutions54Ranks above on this question#1#2 this oneScore5449Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #3 TechnBrains48Ranks below on this question#3#2 this oneScore4849Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for New York App Devs.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#2 React Native Development in New York: 49/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 17.5 | 58% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.5 | 70% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 1.2 | 24% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed20 of 37 on file · 0 of 34 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 37 claims on file: independent source 3 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 34. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 13 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: React Native Development 6 · Mobile Backend and API Integration 3 · iOS App Development 3 · Android App Development 1 · Flutter Development 4 · Mobile MVP Development 2. The full ledger of 37 is on the proof page.
The page presents a case study for Senthora AI, an EdTech app described as real-time voice tutoring, built for iOS and Android using React Native, with results of 70-90% lower cost and seconds response time.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
Senthora AI Real-time voice tutoring that replaces wait times with answers in seconds. 70 to 90% Lower Cost Seconds Response Time iOS Android React Native
New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor app for iOS, Android, and cross-platform, which the page says has 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and generated $5M+ in client revenue. The app is listed as live on the Apple App Store and Google Play.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentAndroid App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
An AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries worldwide. 50,000+ Users $5M+ Client Revenue iOS Android Cross-Platform
New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor app for the education sector, described as a native iOS build with 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Teacher AI, An AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries worldwide. 50,000+ Users $5M+ Client Revenue iOS Android Cross-Platform
New York App Devs built Decima, a React Native healthcare app with HIPAA-compliant architecture and 40+ Apple Health biomarkers synced.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Decima HIPAA-compliant architecture, 40+ Apple Health biomarkers synced.
New York App Devs built Decima, a voice AI health-coaching app with multiple AI personas, Apple HealthKit data sync across 40-plus biomarkers, and calendar integration, built to HIPAA-compliant healthcare standards. The page states the engagement was paused before its public launch, so it is delivered technical and architectural work rather than an active live product.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
we've built HIPAA-compliant architecture directly into a mobile AI application: Decima, a voice AI health-coaching app with multiple AI personas, Apple HealthKit data sync across 40-plus biomarkers, and calendar integration, built to healthcare compliance standards from day one. That engagement was paused before its public launch, so we describe it as delivered technical and architectural work rather than an active live product
New York App Devs built PostureGuard, a HIPAA-compliant native iOS healthcare app that reads posture data from AirPods motion sensors and escalates from gentle reminders to Screen Time app blocking.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workiOS App DevelopmentQuote from the source page
We've also built HIPAA-compliant architecture directly into a real mobile healthcare app, PostureGuard, an iOS app that reads posture data from AirPods motion sensors and escalates from gentle reminders to Screen Time app blocking
A client review from the founder of a legal technology firm praises the team as responsive and quick to review feedback and develop implementation plans. The review does not name the specific service or result, and no publication date is given.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
They had great personnel and were responsive, quick to review my feedback, and quick to develop implementation plans.
New York App Devs built Decima, a voice AI health-coaching mobile app with multiple AI personas, Apple HealthKit data sync across 40-plus biomarkers, and calendar integration, built to HIPAA healthcare compliance standards. The page states the engagement was paused before its public launch, so it is delivered technical and architectural work rather than an active live product.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
we've built HIPAA-compliant architecture directly into a mobile AI application: Decima, a voice AI health-coaching app with multiple AI personas, Apple HealthKit data sync across 40-plus biomarkers, and calendar integration, built to healthcare compliance standards from day one. That engagement was paused before its public launch
A founder of a legal technology firm left a five-star review praising the vendor's responsiveness: 'They had great personnel and were responsive, quick to review my feedback, and quick to develop implementation plans.'
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
“They had great personnel and were responsive, quick to review my feedback, and quick to develop implementation plans.” Founder Legal Technology Firm
New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor React Native app for iOS and Android, for an EdTech client; the page states it reached 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Teacher AI - An AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries worldwide. 50,000+ Users $5M+ Client Revenue iOS Android Cross-Platform
New York App Devs documents a React Native app built for Teacher AI, reporting 50,000+ users across 30+ countries and $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
One real mobile app, built end to end, on React Native, for a real client. EdTech Featured Case Study Teacher AI An AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries worldwide. 50,000+ Users $5M+ Client Revenue
The page states the vendor built Decima, a voice AI health coaching app on iOS with React Native, to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Decima, a voice AI health coaching app we built on iOS with React Native, was built to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards from day one
New York App Devs says it built Decima, a voice AI health coaching app on iOS with React Native, to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards from day one.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
On React Native's compliance track record specifically: Decima, a voice AI health coaching app we built on iOS with React Native, was built to HIPAA-compliant architecture standards from day one, which is the same performance and security bar this framework has to clear on any project.
New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor Flutter app for an EdTech client, built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries, with the page citing 50,000+ users and $5M+ client revenue.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workFlutter DevelopmentQuote from the source page
An AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries worldwide. 50,000+ Users $5M+ Client Revenue iOS Android Cross-Platform
New York App Devs identifies Teacher AI as an example of its cross-platform mobile work and describes the AI tutor as built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries, with $5M+ in client revenue.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workFlutter DevelopmentQuote from the source page
One example of our cross-platform mobile work: an AI tutor built for global scale. EdTech Featured Case Study Teacher AI An AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries worldwide. 50,000+ Users $5M+ Client Revenue
A client identified as 'Executive' from Glamly left a five-star testimonial saying the vendor's project management helped achieve objectives on schedule and within budget.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workFlutter DevelopmentQuote from the source page
“Executive” Glamly Their approach to managing the project was instrumental in achieving our objectives on schedule and within budget.
Glamly said New York App Devs' project management helped achieve its objectives on schedule and within budget.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workFlutter DevelopmentQuote from the source page
“Executive” Glamly Their approach to managing the project was instrumental in achieving our objectives on schedule and within budget.
Vaultly founder and CEO Dana Reyes says in a testimonial that New York App Devs shipped the company's MVP in nine weeks.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile MVP DevelopmentQuote from the source page
They shipped our MVP in nine weeks and it looked like a Series-B product. Our investors noticed.
Vaultly's founder and CEO said New York App Devs shipped its MVP in nine weeks; the product looked like a Series-B product, and investors noticed.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workin nine weeksMobile MVP DevelopmentQuote from the source page
“They shipped our MVP in nine weeks and it looked like a Series-B product. Our investors noticed.”
The vendor's portfolio lists a featured case study for Teacher AI, described as an AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries, with $5M+ in client revenue stated.
Agency's own wordsnewyorkappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Teacher AI - An AI tutor built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries worldwide. 50,000+ Users $5M+ Client Revenue
Positions in every ranking32 rankings
32 positions: 32 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| React Native Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #2 of 24 | 49 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #10 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #10 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #12 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Miamion its own published cases | #9 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
27 more positionsHide the other 27
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| React Native Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #10 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Flutter Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #5 of 10 | 47 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Flutter Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #10 of 26 | 39 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Flutter Development · Miamion its own published cases | #12 of 26 | 39 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Flutter Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #14 of 26 | 39 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Flutter Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #9 of 26 | 39 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Flutter Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #11 of 26 | 39 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #7 of 12 | 45 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · New Yorkon its own published cases | #14 of 18 | 43 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #15 of 31 | 37 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #16 of 31 | 37 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #16 of 31 | 37 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Miamion its own published cases | #20 of 31 | 37 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Phoenixon its own published cases | #49 of 65 | 34 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| iOS App Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #15 of 31 | 37 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile MVP Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #8 of 11 | 42 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #19 of 25 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #21 of 25 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #20 of 25 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Miamion its own published cases | #20 of 25 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile MVP Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #20 of 25 | 33 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #12 of 13 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #25 of 30 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #25 of 30 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #25 of 30 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Miamion its own published cases | #28 of 30 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Android App Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #26 of 30 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- New York, NY, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- New York, NY, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- healthcare, education, retail, fintechVendar profile field
- Industries
- Media, InsuranceVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Senthora AI, Teacher AI, EdTech, Decima, PostureGuard, Vaultly, Legal Technology Firm, GlamlyIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Flutter Development n/a (0 of 10 disclose) · iOS App Development n/a (0 of 12 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (1 of 11 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Flutter Development $299 (2 of 26 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Flutter Development $299 (2 of 26 disclose) · Android App Development n/a (0 of 13 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration n/a (0 of 18 disclose) · Flutter Development $299 (2 of 26 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration $5,000 (8 of 65 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Flutter Development $299 (2 of 26 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Flutter Development $299 (2 of 26 disclose) · iOS App Development $3,150 (5 of 31 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Mobile MVP Development $20,000 (2 of 25 disclose) · Android App Development $2,650 (5 of 30 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 2 reviews
How it counts: 2 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 15 cases with a named client and a result, 34 work claims30/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 34 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 36 confirmed, 0 partly, of 37 with a source24/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 15 of 1520/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 36 of 3715/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 34 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 34 of 37 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 3 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (36 of 37)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 34 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.