DevelopmentMobile DevelopmentPhoenixFlutter Development
Phoenix / Flutter Development

Flutter Development Companies Serving Phoenix (2026)

26 agencies are ranked on documented flutter development work: 1 based in or serving Phoenix and 25 from other cities, marked as such; 0 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 26 Mobile Development agencies for flutter development in Phoenix, 1 of them local: the ones with documented flutter development work on file. The top three by evidence-weighted score are Liquid Technologies (52/100), BitsWits (48) and Appluex (44). No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 11 Phoenix Mobile Development agencies have no flutter development claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1Liquid Technologies 52 · Projects from $500 · clients 4.7/5 (23)5 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  2. 2BitsWits 48 · price not disclosed · clients 4.1/5 (20)7 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 7 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  3. 3Appluex 44 · From $299/month2 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in Phoenix: disclosed monthly floors run from $299, median $299; 2 of 26 disclose a price.

26 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
ForPays
1
Liquid Technologies logo

Liquid Technologies

Houston, USA · since 2017

national coverage · Projects from $500 · clients 4.7/5 (23) Agency's own published cases

Liquid Technologies lists a case study for client Reel Champ in which it built a creator-focused brand identity and app experience for a platform where… (Agency's own words, liqteq.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

52/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
2
BitsWits logo

BitsWits

Chicago, USA · team 100+ · since 2012

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.1/5 (20) Agency's own published cases

…features across a technology stack including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the results are not attributable to a single service. (Agency's own words, bitswits.co)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

48/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
3
Appluex logo

Appluex

Miami, USA

national coverage · From $299/month Agency's own published cases

The AgResource app built by Appluex uses a single Flutter codebase serving both iOS and Android, with a Node.js backend, PostgreSQL, and AWS delivery… (Agency's own words, appluex.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

44/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
4
Trango Tech logo

Trango Tech

New York, NY, USA · team 100+ developers · since 2003

national coverage · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

Trango Tech's portfolio includes ClicknCollect, an eCommerce website for which its developers also created a mobile app built on Flutter. (Agency's own words, trangotech.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

42/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
5
Appingine logo

Appingine

Chicago, USA · team 200+ · since 2005

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 3.8/5 (4) Agency's own published cases

Appingine built VitalFlex, a fitness, health, nutrition and wellness platform using Flutter, Python and TensorFlow Lite, achieving 1.8M+ app downloads… (Agency's own words, appingine.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

42/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
6
Agile Stormers logo

Agile Stormers

Houston, USA

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

Agile Stormers developed Storia, a cross-platform mobile app for audiobooks and podcasts on Android and iOS, using Flutter and a custom backend, with… (Agency's own words, agilestormers.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

41/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
7
AppCrops logo

AppCrops

Chicago, IL, USA · team 200+

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.4/5 (9) Agency's own published cases

Luka Falbo, Founder at Fluospeak, says AppCrops designed and developed the Fluospeak English Learning App and its landing page. (Agency's own words, appcrops.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

40/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
8
TekRevol logo

TekRevol

New York, USA · team 50+ · since 2018

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.0/5 (37) Agency's own published cases

A client named Bob Kimmerle of Rise Up Kings gave a testimonial: the page quotes him saying TekRevol brought their vision to life and built a platform the… (Agency's own words, tekrevol.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

40/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
9
New York App Devs logo

New York App Devs

New York, NY, USA

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (2) Agency's own published cases

New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor Flutter app for an EdTech client, built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries, with the page citing 50,000+ users and $5M+ client revenue… (Agency's own words, newyorkappdevs.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

39/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
10TH

The Hashtech

Houston, USA · team 500+

national coverage · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (3) Agency's own published cases

Ethan Walker, CEO of Digisales, says The Hashtech built his company's website that looks professional, loads quickly, and fits the brand. (Agency's own words, thehashtech.com)

No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

39/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
131 more agencies considered without externally confirmed flutter development work, 11 of them serving Phoenix

This is an absence of evidence, not a quality rating.

One sourced claim moves an agency into the ranking.

No flutter development claim on file yet. (102)

Sources on file say the vendor offers flutter development; no case study or client review documents the work yet. (1)

Frequently asked questions (6)
How many Phoenix Mobile Development agencies have documented flutter development work?
1 of the 12 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in Phoenix has at least one flutter development claim on file under the published rubric, and 25 more from other cities join the ranking with documented flutter development work; 0 of the 26 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 0 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 11 Phoenix agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which Phoenix flutter development agency fits my type of business?
By the clients named in their documented flutter development work: Dental, medical and wellness: Liquid Technologies (#1), Appingine (#5) and Agile Stormers (#6); Shops, restaurants and retail: Agile Stormers (#6) and Software Orca (#16). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does flutter development cost in Phoenix?
Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $299/month and the median floor is $299/month. 2 of 26 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?
0 of 26 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.
How is this list different from the Phoenix Mobile Development page?
The Phoenix Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with flutter development evidence on file, scores them on the flutter development query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓
D1Full ranking table26 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1Liquid Technologies5215.513.38.96.653.21.3-20.85/0Not verified
2BitsWits4815.910.3117.22.52.70-20.87/0Not verified
3Appluex441216.28.63501.3-20.82/0Not verified
4Trango Tech421410.310.17.22.500-20.83/0Not verified
5Appingine421310.387.22.51.31.3-20.82/0Not verified
6Agile Stormers411610.312.7301.20-20.819/0Not verified
7AppCrops4015.510.3932.52.10-20.85/0Not verified
8TekRevol401210.38.362.53.20-20.82/0Not verified
9New York App Devs3916.510.39.5301.20-20.84/0Not verified
10The Hashtech391510.39.132.51.50-20.84/0Not verified
11JumpGrowth38146.88.662.51.70-20.83/0Not verified
12LOW/CODE Agency3812.510.38.95.402.90-20.83/0Not verified
13Digipie Technologies38910.386.62.52.71.3-20.81/0Not verified
14Synergy Labs38815.98.5304.30-20.81/0Not verified
15AppVerticals371210.38.4304.80-20.82/0Not verified
16Software Orca3616.96.88.6302.80-20.84/0Not verified
17Next App361510.38.4301.60-20.84/0Not verified
18iQlance Solutions36810.387.22.52.40-20.81/0Not verified
19Go Tech Solutions351410.38.9300.80-20.83/0Not verified
20Apptunix33810.37.932.53.10-20.81/0Not verified
21TechnBrains3386.87.97.203.31.3-20.81/0Not verified
22American App Coder3113.510.393000-50.82/0Not verified
23TechGropse31810.38.8301.21.3-20.81/0Not verified
24Marotino29810.3832.51.90-50.81/0Not verified
25Developers of Chicago28910.310.63000-50.81/0Not verified
26Kreante2666.87.94.82.500-20.81/0Not verified

Pool 12 · ranked 26 · unranked 131 (28 with profile tags only) · verified 0 · pricing disclosed 2 · case studies on file 0 · an outside source names the work 0 · an outside document describes it 0

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 Liquid Technologies52/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · Projects from $500 · projects from $500 · 66 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.5/300.5175 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Liquid Technologies lists a case study for client Reel Champ in which it built a creator-focused brand identity and app experience for a… (liqteq.com, claimed); Liquid Technologies lists a case study for client Roam Trips in which it designed a brand identity and built a platform with a… (liqteq.com, claimed)
Fit to this query13.3/250.53Serves Phoenix from Houston, USA; no local office on file; Projects from $500; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth8.9/150.5951 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 66 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability6.6/100.66In business since 2017; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (Projects from $500); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation3.2/50.64923 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a certification per theexpertroster.com; Sources: theexpertroster.com, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Liquid Technologies lists a case study for client Reel Champ in which it built a creator-focused brand identity and app experience for a platform where creators share, monetize, and support causes. No measurable results are stated.

    Agency's own words · liqteq.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Liquid Technologies lists a case study for client Roam Trips in which it designed a brand identity and built a platform with a travel-focused visual language and user experience. No measurable results are stated.

    Agency's own words · liqteq.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Liquid Technologies lists a case study for client Vitalog describing mobile app development work, including a brand identity that made online doctor consultations and medical record management user-friendly. No measurable results are stated.

    Agency's own words · liqteq.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Liquid Technologies lists a case study for client Trans Global Solutions (TGS) in which it designed a professional identity and a streamlined digital interface. No measurable results are stated.

    Agency's own words · liqteq.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Francisco Zepeda, CEO of Vitalog, gave a testimonial praising the team's commitment to building the product as the client wanted.

    Agency's own words · liqteq.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 11 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 12 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#2 BitsWits48/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 38 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.9/300.5297 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 7 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; BitsWits describes building VIFTY, a platform connecting service providers with consumers, as a multifaceted mobile app. The work combined… (bitswits.co, claimed); BitsWits designed The Practice Pen, a skill development app using video-based learning and gamification, where users can upload practice… (bitswits.co, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from Chicago, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth11/150.731 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 7 of 38 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2012; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 100+; Process not documented
Reputation2.7/50.54220 third-party reviews at 4.1
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • BitsWits describes building VIFTY, a platform connecting service providers with consumers, as a multifaceted mobile app. The work combined app development with social and booking features across a technology stack including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the results are not attributable to a single service.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • BitsWits designed The Practice Pen, a skill development app using video-based learning and gamification, where users can upload practice videos, receive feedback, and compete in interactive challenges.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client identified as Joseph D'Amora, Director of Inside Sales, credited BitsWits' technical knowledge with ensuring the app functioned smoothly.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client identified as Ryan Jaden, Technical Team Lead, said BitsWits transformed his vision into a user-friendly app.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client identified as Kaylee Slone, Digital Marketing Manager, expressed satisfaction with BitsWits' project management, attention to detail, and communication.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client identified as Mauryo Jones, VP Safety, Health & Security, said BitsWits made the app responsive and visually stunning and exceeded expectations.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • BitsWits built Soul Scribe, a digital diary app combining journaling with social interaction, with features including post management, in-app messaging, groups management, and privacy controls. The page lists technologies including React Native, Flutter, Swift, and AWS, so the specific platform used for the build is not attributable to one framework.

    Agency's own words · bitswits.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 4 from 19 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#3 Appluex44/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $299/month · hourly $150 an hour · 34 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The AgResource app built by Appluex uses a single Flutter codebase serving both iOS and Android, with a Node.js backend, PostgreSQL, and… (appluex.com, claimed); Appluex built a mobile app for AgResource, an agriculture market commentary service, using Flutter with a single codebase serving iOS and… (appluex.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Phoenix from Miami, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $299/month, inside the flutter development band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.6/150.5741 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 34 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (From $299/month); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • The AgResource app built by Appluex uses a single Flutter codebase serving both iOS and Android, with a Node.js backend, PostgreSQL, and AWS delivery infrastructure.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Appluex built a mobile app for AgResource, an agriculture market commentary service, using Flutter with a single codebase serving iOS and Android, backed by a Node.js backend, PostgreSQL, and AWS.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#4 Trango Tech42/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 22 claims on file

Evidence for this query14/300.4673 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Trango Tech's portfolio includes ClicknCollect, an eCommerce website for which its developers also created a mobile app built on Flutter. (trangotech.com, claimed); Trango Tech built a mobile app for client ClicknCollect, an all-in-one eCommerce website, using Flutter. (trangotech.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names healthcare clients
Capability depth10.1/150.671 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 22 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2003; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 100+ developers; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Trango Tech's portfolio includes ClicknCollect, an eCommerce website for which its developers also created a mobile app built on Flutter.

    Agency's own words · trangotech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Trango Tech built a mobile app for client ClicknCollect, an all-in-one eCommerce website, using Flutter.

    Agency's own words · trangotech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Trango Tech's portfolio includes Goto, an online shopping marketplace for which it built an app on Flutter.

    Agency's own words · trangotech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

#5 Appingine42/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 78 claims on file

Evidence for this query13/300.4332 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Appingine built VitalFlex, a fitness, health, nutrition and wellness platform using Flutter, Python and TensorFlow Lite, achieving 1.8M+… (appingine.com, claimed); A client identified as Sarah Micheal left a testimonial praising Appingine's work on Flutter apps, citing professional and timely service… (appingine.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from Chicago, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names ecommerce clients
Capability depth8/150.5321 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 78 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2005; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 200+; Process not documented
Reputation1.3/50.2664 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: a press mention per selectedfirms.co; Sources: selectedfirms.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Appingine built VitalFlex, a fitness, health, nutrition and wellness platform using Flutter, Python and TensorFlow Lite, achieving 1.8M+ app downloads across all platforms, a 4.7 star average app rating, and a 52% increase in user engagement and retention.

    Agency's own words · appingine.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client identified as Sarah Micheal left a testimonial praising Appingine's work on Flutter apps, citing professional and timely service in a short timeframe.

    Agency's own words · appingine.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 3.4 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#6 Agile Stormers41/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 68 claims on file

Evidence for this query16/300.532999999999999919 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 19 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Agile Stormers developed Storia, a cross-platform mobile app for audiobooks and podcasts on Android and iOS, using Flutter and a custom… (agilestormers.com, claimed); Agile Stormers developed a cross-platform mobile commerce application for Homigo, a furniture and home decor retailer, covering product… (agilestormers.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from Houston, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth12.7/150.84900000000000011 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 19 of 68 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation1.2/50.2392 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Agile Stormers developed Storia, a cross-platform mobile app for audiobooks and podcasts on Android and iOS, using Flutter and a custom backend, with services spanning product strategy, UI/UX design, and mobile app development.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed a cross-platform mobile commerce application for Homigo, a furniture and home decor retailer, covering product strategy, UI/UX design, and Flutter development for Android and iOS. The stated result was a dedicated mobile shopping experience with improved product discovery, streamlined checkout, and a scalable Flutter architecture. A testimonial from Michael Carter, Founder of Homigo, praises the delivered platform.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed a cross-platform mobile commerce app for client Doughly, an artisan bakery, using Flutter with a scalable backend for Android and iOS. The app launched a mobile sales channel with product browsing, secure checkout, delivery and pickup options, and customer reviews, and the page credits digital ordering with reducing manual processes and improving order accuracy.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed Learnix, an e-learning marketplace app, using Flutter with a custom backend, launching it on both Android and iOS from a single codebase.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Trailly partnered with Agile Stormers to develop a cross-platform outdoor adventure mobile app for Android and iOS, built with Flutter and a custom backend covering trail discovery, real-time navigation, campsite exploration, and activity tracking. The project covered product strategy, UI/UX design, mobile app development, and deployment, and the page attributes results such as unified trail discovery and navigation, higher user engagement, and faster cross-platform delivery from a single codebase.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed a cross-platform travel discovery and booking mobile app for Voyager, built for Android and iOS from a single Flutter codebase, covering product strategy, UI/UX design, and mobile app development. The engagement combined design and development, so results are not attributable to one service.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed Momently, a cross-platform social networking application for Android and iOS, providing product strategy, UI/UX design, and mobile app development using Flutter and a custom backend.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Flutter enabled simultaneous Android and iOS deployment while simplifying maintenance.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers delivered the Storia app from a single Flutter codebase for both Android and iOS, which the client says allowed them to keep up with feature requests instead of building everything twice.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers delivered the Voyager platform from product strategy and UI/UX design through Flutter development and deployment, positioning it as a scalable travel platform.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The Voyager project used Flutter to enable simultaneous Android and iOS deployment while simplifying maintenance.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers built the Momently app with Flutter and a custom backend, delivering a consistent experience across Android and iOS from a single codebase, with features including real-time messaging, native voice and video calling, and community discovery.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The Momently project resulted in a unified social ecosystem combining content sharing, messaging, and communication, with a scalable Flutter backend supporting future growth and faster deployment across Android and iOS from a single codebase.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed Storia's cross-platform mobile application with Flutter and a custom backend for Android and iOS.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed Homigo’s cross-platform mobile commerce application using Flutter, with a consistent shopping experience across Android and iOS. The platform included product discovery, checkout, wishlists, and order history.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed a cross-platform mobile commerce app for client Doughly using Flutter with a scalable backend, delivering the shopping experience across Android and iOS. The engagement covered product strategy, UI/UX design, and mobile app development.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed Vellure, a beauty and wellness booking application, delivering product strategy, UI/UX design, and mobile app development for a Flutter cross-platform app deployed on Android and iOS from a single codebase.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • The Vellure engagement used a single Flutter codebase, which enabled simultaneous Android and iOS deployment, according to the case study's stated results.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Agile Stormers developed Trailly, an outdoor adventure and trail discovery platform, using Flutter and a custom backend, delivering cross-platform Android and iOS apps from a single codebase. The engagement covered product strategy, UI/UX design, and mobile app development, with features including trail discovery, real-time navigation, activity tracking, and personalized dashboards.

    Agency's own words · agilestormers.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#7 AppCrops40/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 61 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.5/300.5175 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Luka Falbo, Founder at Fluospeak, says AppCrops designed and developed the Fluospeak English Learning App and its landing page. (appcrops.com, claimed); Hope Mclendon, Founder & COO, says she worked with AppCrops on the design and development of her service-based website, which was… (appcrops.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9/150.6021 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 61 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 200+; Process not documented
Reputation2.1/50.418 third-party reviews at 4.3
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Luka Falbo, Founder at Fluospeak, says AppCrops designed and developed the Fluospeak English Learning App and its landing page.

    Agency's own words · appcrops.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Hope Mclendon, Founder & COO, says she worked with AppCrops on the design and development of her service-based website, which was delivered clean, modern, and fully functional.

    Agency's own words · appcrops.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Alex, Founder at Sellers Route, says AppCrops designed and developed the Sellers Route app, which includes user management, route optimization, analytics, and real-time tracking.

    Agency's own words · appcrops.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • AppCrops developed Cal AI, an intelligent food and calorie tracking app, which uses advanced AI technology to instantly analyze meals through photos and accurately calculate calories, macros, and nutritional values in seconds.

    Agency's own words · appcrops.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • AppCrops developed Speak For Me, an app that allows users to speak typed words aloud in a natural voice, enabling real-time phone calls where the app places the call and speaks the typed words down the line.

    Agency's own words · appcrops.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 4.3 from 8 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#8 TekRevol40/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 50 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; A client named Bob Kimmerle of Rise Up Kings gave a testimonial: the page quotes him saying TekRevol brought their vision to life and… (tekrevol.com, claimed); A client named Korelle Dickson gave a testimonial about the Heet Dating app, saying that working with TekRevol as their Flutter… (tekrevol.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from New York, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.3/150.551 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 50 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability6/100.6In business since 2018; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 50+; Process not documented
Reputation3.2/50.63237 third-party reviews at 4.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • A client named Bob Kimmerle of Rise Up Kings gave a testimonial: the page quotes him saying TekRevol brought their vision to life and built a platform the community keeps using daily.

    Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • A client named Korelle Dickson gave a testimonial about the Heet Dating app, saying that working with TekRevol as their Flutter development agency helped bring Heat Map and Spark to life.

    Agency's own words · tekrevol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.5 from 11 reviews; Trustpilot 3.8 from 26 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#9 New York App Devs39/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 38 claims on file

Evidence for this query16.5/300.554 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor Flutter app for an EdTech client, built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries, with the… (newyorkappdevs.com, claimed); New York App Devs identifies Teacher AI as an example of its cross-platform mobile work and describes the AI tutor as built for 50,000+… (newyorkappdevs.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names healthcare clients
Capability depth9.5/150.6321 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 38 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation1.2/50.2392 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • New York App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI tutor Flutter app for an EdTech client, built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries, with the page citing 50,000+ users and $5M+ client revenue.

    Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • New York App Devs identifies Teacher AI as an example of its cross-platform mobile work and describes the AI tutor as built for 50,000+ users across 30+ countries, with $5M+ in client revenue.

    Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • A client identified as 'Executive' from Glamly left a five-star testimonial saying the vendor's project management helped achieve objectives on schedule and within budget.

    Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Glamly said New York App Devs' project management helped achieve its objectives on schedule and within budget.

    Agency's own words · newyorkappdevs.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#10 The Hashtech39/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · price not disclosed · 46 claims on file

Evidence for this query15/300.54 flutter development claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Ethan Walker, CEO of Digisales, says The Hashtech built his company's website that looks professional, loads quickly, and fits the brand. (thehashtech.com, claimed); Omar Al Hassan, a game designer, says The Hashtech built his mobile game with visual effects and engaging gameplay that received excellent… (thehashtech.com, claimed)
Fit to this query10.3/250.41Serves Phoenix from Houston, USA; no local office on file; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9.1/150.6091 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 46 claims on file concern flutter development
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 500+; Process not documented
Reputation1.5/50.3013 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names flutter development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Ethan Walker, CEO of Digisales, says The Hashtech built his company's website that looks professional, loads quickly, and fits the brand.

    Agency's own words · thehashtech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Omar Al Hassan, a game designer, says The Hashtech built his mobile game with visual effects and engaging gameplay that received excellent Play Store reviews.

    Agency's own words · thehashtech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Alexa Johnson, Operation Head, says The Hashtech modernized her outdated logistics software with a clean UI and automation features that improved performance.

    Agency's own words · thehashtech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The Hashtech built a mobile app for FoodEase App after the startup sought an app that could compete with larger players. The founder said the team delivered what was needed and worked quickly.

    Agency's own words · thehashtech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 3 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Positions 11 to 26: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.11

A claim counts as Flutter evidence when a source on file names an app the company built, rebuilt or maintains in Flutter or FlutterFlow, ideally with the client and the platforms it shipped on. A technology listed on the company's services page without a project does not count.

Terms that count:
flutter, flutterflow
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names flutter development work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports flutter development under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
Flutter Development 2026.11
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/development/mobile-development/phoenix/flutter-development

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring