Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 14 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #4 React Native Development in Chicago, of 24 · also in 5 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- 5% written in the last 12 months
- 10% rate it 3 stars or lower
Clients most often value patient, helpful communication and say the agency delivered websites or apps that met their needs. Two reviewers make serious allegations of fraud and poor development, while most other reviews are positive, so experiences are not consistent.More
- Patient, helpful communication and support8
- Professional, knowledgeable work6
- Attention to client needs, feedback, and changes5
- Making projects easier to understand or manage4
- Timely work3
“He never got tired of my phone calls and texts, and was ready to answer all of my questions patiently and in details.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“Their team demonstrated exceptional technical skill, clear communication, and a strong commitment to excellence.”
“The website is functioning exactly as requested, and would certainly recommend Koderspedia to others”
“they not only simplified the process, approach roadmap but was connected with us throughout the process”
“completed tasks in a timely manner”
- Alleged fraud or dishonest business practices2
- Poor development quality1
“From Day #1 it was all a scam.”
Show 1 more quoteHide quotes
“Lousy developers (amateur at best).”
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- Website design, development, or redesign8
- Mobile app development4
- Marketing1
- Student app founders
- Solo paralegal and process-serving business
- Small business
- Your business looks like the reviewers': student app founders; solo paralegal and process-serving business; small business.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Website design, development, or redesign (8 of 13 mentions); Mobile app development (4).
- Read the criticism first: "Alleged fraud or dishonest business practices" (2 of 20 reviews read).
- Read the criticism first: "Poor development quality" (1 of 20 reviews read).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 14 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #3 Appingine51Ranks above on this question#3#4 this oneScore5150Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #5 BitsWits50Ranks below on this question#5#4 this oneScore5050Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for KodersPedia.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#4 React Native Development in Chicago: 50/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 15.8 | 53% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 14.1 | 94% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 3.2 | 64% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed14 of 16 on file · 0 of 14 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 16 claims on file: independent source 2 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 14. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 6 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: React Native Development 6. The full ledger of 16 is on the proof page.
The portfolio lists a project named Wedstimate built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Wedstimate React Native, React
The portfolio lists a project named Vote America built with React and React Native. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Vote America React, React Native
The portfolio lists a project named Calm Now described as a mobile app built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Calm Now Mobile APP, React Native, React
The page lists a portfolio entry for a client named Calm Now, labeled as a Mobile APP built with React Native and React. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Calm Now | Mobile APP, React Native, React
The page lists a portfolio entry for a client named Organic Produce Finder, labeled as a React Native project. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Organic Produce Finder | React Native
The portfolio lists a mobile app named Calm Now built with React Native and React, but the page provides no client details or results for it.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentQuote from the source page
Calm Now Mobile APP, React Native, React
The portfolio lists a project named Poke In The I described as a gaming app. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Poke In The I Gaming APP
KodersPedia's portfolio lists a project called Poke In The I, labeled as a Gaming APP. The page states no client contact, timeline, or outcome for this project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Poke In The I | Gaming APP
KodersPedia built the Lacavalier App, an e-commerce platform for premium wines, addressing limited access to quality wines with a solution including membership perks and infeed delivery.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Lacavalier App E-commerce platform for premium wines. Problem: Limited access to quality wines. Solution: Membership perks. Infeed delivery.
KodersPedia built the Kelstech Website, which connects users with technicians, with a user-friendly website, emergency call features, and a database of technicians.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Kelstech Website Connecting users with technicians. Problem: Difficulty finding technicians. Solution: User-friendly website. Emergency call features. A database of technicians.
The portfolio lists a project named Your Nyc Experience built on Webflow. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Your Nyc Experience Webflow
KodersPedia built an informative website for V-Stream Aviation's private planes, addressing a lack of information about services with detailed aircraft rental services including pilot assistance.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
V-Stream Aviation Website An informative site for V-Stream Aviation's private planes. Problem: Lack of information about services. Solution: Detailed aircraft rental services. Inclusive of pilot assistance
KodersPedia built the Hourly Presence App, a booking app for photographers with in-app chat, addressing difficulty in booking photographers with a user-friendly booking system and in-app chat for coordination.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Hourly Presence App Booking app for photographers with in-app chat. Problem: Difficulty in booking photographers. Solution: User-friendly booking system. In-app chat for coordination.
The page lists a portfolio entry for a client named Queen of Diamond, labeled as a Gaming APP and Website project. No outcome or result is stated for the project.
Agency's own wordskoderspedia.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Queen of Diamond
Positions in every ranking6 rankings
6 positions: 6 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| React Native Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #4 of 24 | 50 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #12 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #12 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #15 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Miamion its own published cases | #11 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
1 more positionHide the other 1
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| React Native Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #12 of 24 | 41 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Chicago, IL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Chicago, IL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Wedstimate, Vote America, Calm Now, Organic Produce Finder, Poke In The I, Lacavalier, Kelstech, Your Nyc ExperienceIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 4 reviews
- Trustpilot4 · 40 reviews
How it counts: 40 third-party reviews at 4.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 14 work claims10/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 14 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 14 confirmed, 0 partly, of 16 with a source22/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 14 of 1613/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names react native development work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 14 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 14 of 16 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 2 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (14 of 16)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 14 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.