No published ranking admits this vendor on documented work yet; the profile shows what is on file.
Not in any evidence-ranked listing yet: no independent claim documents work for a published need.
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/53 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 0% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 0% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise Vanity Point for their high-quality work, guidance, and professionalism. They appreciate the team's ability to understand their business and improve their ideas. No criticisms were mentioned in any of the reviews.More
- Quality of work4
- Guidance and communication2
- Understanding business1
“it turned out much better than I had envisioned”
Show 2 more quotesHide quotes
“walked me through the process and kept me informed every step of the way”
“took the time to truly understand our business”
No criticism in the 2 reviews read.
- Web development3
- Mobile app development1
- Individual
Show 2 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Kimber, with help from others, has been working long hours to create our web site and has done a great job. I think it looks outstanding and will give Mutoh America a great new look and an easier customer interface to find information they need to make a buying decision.”
“They went above and beyond in creating our web site and marketing materials and took the time to truly understand our business. Not only are they extremely talented and knowledgeable about web site development and marketing, but quite professional at every step of the process.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (B2B companies, B2C brands) and the industries on file (healthcare, real estate, education).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Web development (3 of 4 mentions); Mobile app development (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
Price not disclosed. Ask for a quote and the minimum term.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
Not ranked yet, so there are no ranking neighbours to compare with.
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Vanity Point.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterionNot ranked
No score yet: Vanity Point is not admitted to any evidence-ranked listing. The score appears with the first independent claim that documents work for a published need.
All claims in the feed3 of 4 on file · 0 of 3 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 4 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 3. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: none tagged to a ranked need. The full ledger of 4 is on the proof page.
Brian Phipps, General Manager of MUTOH, credited Vanity Point (specifically a team member named Kimber) with building the Mutoh America website, saying it looks outstanding and gives the company a new look and an easier customer interface.
Agency's own wordsvanitymobileapps.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Kimber, with help from others, has been working long hours to create our web site and has done a great job. I think it looks outstanding and will give Mutoh America a great new look and an easier customer interface to find information they need to make a buying decision.
Lynnae Luna, Office Manager of Exclusive Collision Center, wrote a testimonial stating Vanity Point created the company's web site and marketing materials, describing the vendor as professional at every step of the process.
Agency's own wordsvanitymobileapps.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
They went above and beyond in creating our web site and marketing materials and took the time to truly understand our business. Not only are they extremely talented and knowledgeable about web site development and marketing, but quite professional at every step of the process.
Vanity Point lists Exclusive Collision Center, a Phoenix metro area auto body shop, among its recent works, saying the shop chose the vendor to update its web presence with a modern HTML5 single-page site.
Agency's own wordsvanitymobileapps.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The Phoenix metro area's most respected auto body shop choose Vanity Point to update its web presence with a modern HTML5 single-page style site.
Positions in every ranking0 rankings
Not admitted to any ranking yet.
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- b2b, b2cVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, Real Estate, Education, Media, Finance, FitnessVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- MUTOH, Exclusive Collision CenterIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Reputation
- Google5 · 3 reviews
How it counts: reputation is weighted 5 of 100 and discounted when few reviews are on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2002Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- n/a
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size, logo14/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 3 work claims3/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 3 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 3 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source19/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 3 of 411/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- 3 of 4 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Decision layer complete: score, verdict, reason, best position (not ranked)
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (3 of 4)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 3 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (2 named)
- Open: JSON-LD carries Vendar's rating as a Review and an absolute logo (built from the same view; checked on the live page by QA)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.