Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #11 Mobile Backend and API Integration in Los Angeles, of 12 · also in 12 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business is in the industries on file: healthcare, beauty, fitness.
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #10 Octal Digital42Ranks above on this question#10#11 this oneScore4240Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #12 AppVerticals39Ranks below on this question#12#11 this oneScore3940Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Los Angeles App Devs.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#11 Mobile Backend and API Integration in Los Angeles: 40/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 11 | 37% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 15 | 100% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed4 of 4 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 4 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: React Native Development 1 · Mobile Backend and API Integration 2 · Mobile App Modernization 1. The full ledger of 4 is on the proof page.
Los Angeles App Devs built Senthora AI, a voice-first AI language tutor built on LiveKit's real-time pipeline with sub-2-second voice response time, supporting 6-8 languages as a React Native cross-platform app.
Agency's own wordslosangelesappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workReact Native DevelopmentMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
Senthora is a voice-first AI language tutor built on LiveKit’s real-time pipeline, responding in under 2 seconds so practice feels like a real conversation.
Los Angeles App Devs built WATTBA, a barbershop booking platform pairing a customer app with a Partner Portal, instrumented with Firebase Analytics and rebuilt around 15-minute slot booking.
Agency's own wordslosangelesappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMobile App ModernizationMobile Backend and API IntegrationQuote from the source page
Wattba pairs a customer app with a Partner Portal, instrumented end to end with Firebase Analytics and rebuilt around 15-minute slot booking so barbershops can actually see and fill their day.
Los Angeles App Devs built Training Mate, a hands-free AI personal trainer app for iOS and Android that coaches sets out loud using Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio, adjusting weight and reps in real time.
Agency's own wordslosangelesappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Training Mate coaches every set out loud with Google Gemini 2.5 Flash Native Audio, adjusting weight and reps in real time so users can keep their phone locked.
Los Angeles App Devs built Teacher AI, an AI speaking-practice app used by 10,000+ students across 30+ languages.
Agency's own wordslosangelesappdevs.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Teacher AI gives learners unlimited, judgment-free speaking practice with AI teachers modeled on real instructors, now used by 10,000+ students across 30+ languages.
Positions in every ranking13 rankings
13 positions: 13 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #11 of 12 | 40 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile Backend and API Integration · Phoenixon its own published cases | #57 of 65 | 31 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #22 of 24 | 33 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Miamion its own published cases | #23 of 23 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Chicagoon its own published cases | #24 of 24 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
8 more positionsHide the other 8
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| React Native Development · Houstonon its own published cases | #24 of 24 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · New Yorkon its own published cases | #24 of 24 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #18 of 23 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Chicagoon its own published cases | #23 of 23 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Houstonon its own published cases | #23 of 23 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Mobile App Modernization · Phoenixon its own published cases | #23 of 23 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Miamion its own published cases | #24 of 24 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| React Native Development · Phoenixon its own published cases | #24 of 24 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles, CA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Los Angeles, CA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, Beauty, FitnessVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Senthora AI, WATTBA, Training Mate, Teacher AIIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- project
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Mobile Backend and API Integration $8,500 (2 of 12 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · Mobile Backend and API Integration $5,000 (8 of 65 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · Mobile App Modernization $6,000 (5 of 23 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose) · React Native Development $299 (2 of 24 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- Mobile DevelopmentVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: client types10/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee4/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims4/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 415/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 4 of 4 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.