DevelopmentMobile DevelopmentMiamiMobile Backend and API Integration
Miami / Mobile Backend and API Integration

Best Mobile Backend and API Integration Companies in Miami (2026)

12 of 36 agencies are ranked on documented mobile backend and API integration work; 2 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 12 of 36 Mobile Development agencies serving Miami for mobile backend and API integration: the ones with documented mobile backend and API integration work on file. The top three by evidence-weighted score are Simform (60/100), Bolder Apps (60) and Appluex (58). No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 24 Miami Mobile Development agencies have no mobile backend and API integration claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1Simform 60 · price not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (27)6 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 1 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites
  2. 2Bolder Apps 60 · price not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (26)5 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 1 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites
  3. 3Appluex 58 · From $299/month5 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in Miami: disclosed monthly floors run from $100 to $299, median $200; 3 of 12 disclose a price.

12 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
ForPays
1
Simform logo

Simform

Miami, USA · team 1,200+ · since 2010

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.5/5 (27) Agency's own published cases

Simform is an AWS Premier Consulting Partner with over 200 AWS-certified engineers. (Independent source, metacto.com)

Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.

60/100
Confidence not rated yet
Not verified
View profile
2
Bolder Apps logo

Bolder Apps

Miami, FL, USA · since 2019

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.9/5 (26) Agency's own published cases

Bolder Apps is a Miami-headquartered mobile and web app development agency founded in 2019 that partners with startups and businesses worldwide. (Independent source, api.newsfilecorp.com)

Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.

60/100
Confidence not rated yet
Not verified
View profile
3
Appluex logo

Appluex

Miami, USA

HQ in Miami · From $299/month Agency's own published cases

Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB. (Agency's own words, appluex.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

58/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
4J

Jafton

Miami, USA · team 120+

HQ in Miami · $20 to $200/hour · clients 3.8/5 (8) Agency's own published cases

Jafton's blockchain work includes BlockGains App, a crypto portfolio app that lets crypto holders track portfolio activity, get real-time news, and… (Agency's own words, jafton.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

55/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
5T

TropiDev

Miami, FL, USA · since 2017

HQ in Miami · From $100/month Agency's own published cases

TropiDev built a service scheduling app with third-party API integrations and detailed UX for CleanPro Services FL, per a client review from Robert L. (Agency's own words, tropidev.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

48/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
6ST

SDSol Technologies

Miami, FL, USA · team 40+

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (22) Agency's own published cases

…iOS and Android mobile apps, a web application, and a backend operating platform. (Agency's own words, sdsol.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
7
Trango Tech logo

Trango Tech

New York, NY, USA · team 100+ developers · since 2003

serves Miami from New York · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

…and the app has reached 50k downloads with a stable backend. (Agency's own words, trangotech.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

44/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
8
Kreante logo

Kreante

Miami, USA · team 120 · since 2020

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

…The build used FlutterFlow, Firebase, and Supabase. (Agency's own words, kreante.co)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

43/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
9
Marotino logo

Marotino

Miami, FL, USA · team 40+

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

…product strategy, UX/UI design, mobile development, backend infrastructure, and App Store launch. (Agency's own words, marotino.com)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

43/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
10
Synergy Labs logo

Synergy Labs

Miami, FL, USA

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (52) Agency's own published cases

Synergy Labs lists Flutter and Firebase as the tech stack for Clapper, a social networking app. (Agency's own words, synergylabs.co)

No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

41/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
24 more agencies serve Miami, but without externally confirmed mobile backend and API integration work
Frequently asked questions (5)
How many Miami Mobile Development agencies have documented mobile backend and API integration work?
12 of the 36 Mobile Development agencies Vendar tracks in Miami have at least one mobile backend and API integration claim on file under the published rubric; 2 of the 12 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 2 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 24 Miami agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
What does mobile backend and API integration cost in Miami?
Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $100/month and the median floor is $200/month. 3 of 12 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?
0 of 12 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.
How is this list different from the Miami Mobile Development page?
The Miami Mobile Development page ranks every Mobile Development agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with mobile backend and API integration evidence on file, scores them on the mobile backend and API integration query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓
D1Full ranking table12 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1Simform6023.615.59.87.22.53.30-2n/a6/1Not verified
2Bolder Apps6023.2199.85.403.51.3-2n/a5/1Not verified
3Appluex5815.12510.33501.3-20.85/0Not verified
4Jafton5511.2229.837.51.81.3-20.84/0Not verified
5TropiDev488258.56.6500-50.81/0Not verified
6SDSol Technologies4711199.732.53.40-20.82/0Not verified
7Trango Tech441115.99.27.22.500-20.82/0Not verified
8Kreante4313.515.58.64.82.500-20.83/0Not verified
9Marotino4312.519932.51.90-50.83/0Not verified
10Synergy Labs418198.5304.30-20.81/0Not verified
11LOW/CODE Agency3961985.402.90-20.81/0Not verified
12AppVerticals36615.97.9304.80-20.81/0Not verified

Pool 36 · ranked 12 · unranked 24 (14 with profile tags only) · verified 0 · pricing disclosed 3 · case studies on file 0 · an outside source names the work 2 · an outside document describes it 2

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 Simform60/100 · Confidence not rated yet

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 50 claims on file

Evidence for this query23.6/300.78799999999999996 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 1 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; Simform is an AWS Premier Consulting Partner with over 200 AWS-certified engineers. (metacto.com, verified); Simform developed Evergen's field inventory solution, handling development from UI/UX through backend and DevOps; the app works across… (simform.com, claimed)
Fit to this query15.5/250.62Headquartered in Miami (Miami, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth9.8/150.651 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 6 of 50 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2010; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 1,200+; Process not documented
Reputation3.3/50.650999999999999927 third-party reviews at 4.5
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Simform is an AWS Premier Consulting Partner with over 200 AWS-certified engineers.

    Independent source · metacto.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1 · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Simform developed Evergen's field inventory solution, handling development from UI/UX through backend and DevOps; the app works across user groups.

    Agency's own words · simform.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Simform developed a cross-platform application for Bon Appetit; the client's operations manager reports the engagement went well, though no specific metrics are given.

    Agency's own words · simform.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The mobile ecosystem integrated 100+ devices for remote control and diagnostics at scale.

    Agency's own words · simform.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Simform implemented a modular integration layer to standardize ERP and third-party system connections, improving sync and scalability.

    Agency's own words · simform.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For a patient-facing digital application and data platform, Simform worked as an end-to-end technology partner building a mobile app and also designed an Azure Data Factory pipeline to clean data before it reached the app and admin dashboard; the result spans both app development and data engineering.

    Agency's own words · simform.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Trustpilot 4.5 from 27 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#2 Bolder Apps60/100 · Confidence not rated yet

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 41 claims on file

Evidence for this query23.2/300.7755 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 1 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; Bolder Apps is a Miami-headquartered mobile and web app development agency founded in 2019 that partners with startups and businesses… (api.newsfilecorp.com, verified); Bolder Apps delivered a project for the American Cancer Society that was, per client Len Swegart, 'delivered exactly as promised'; the… (bolderapps.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9.8/150.6521 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 41 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability5.4/100.54In business since 2019; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation3.5/50.70126 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Bolder Apps is a Miami-headquartered mobile and web app development agency founded in 2019 that partners with startups and businesses worldwide.

    Independent source · api.newsfilecorp.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1.2 · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Bolder Apps delivered a project for the American Cancer Society that was, per client Len Swegart, 'delivered exactly as promised'; the page does not specify the service or measurable result.

    Agency's own words · bolderapps.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client at Rydoo, Anna Haberfellner, states Bolder Apps turned their ideas into a finished, user-friendly product; the page does not specify the service type or measurable result.

    Agency's own words · bolderapps.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client at Qonto, Steve Anavi, praises Bolder Apps' scoping process and design work on a delivered product; the page does not specify the service type or measurable result.

    Agency's own words · bolderapps.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Carl Porter, founder of Producers Link, credits Bolder Apps with understanding the vision behind his product; the page does not specify the service or measurable result.

    Agency's own words · bolderapps.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 24 reviews; Trustpilot 3.3 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#3 Appluex58/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · From $299/month · hourly $150 an hour · 34 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.1/300.5045 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB. (appluex.com, claimed); The AgResource app built by Appluex uses a single Flutter codebase serving both iOS and Android, with a Node.js backend, PostgreSQL, and… (appluex.com, claimed)
Fit to this query25/251Headquartered in Miami (Miami, USA); Retainers from $299/month, inside the mobile backend and API integration band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth10.3/150.6841 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 5 of 34 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (From $299/month); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per techreviewer.co; Sources: techreviewer.co, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Appluex built the Glitz mobile app as a React Native app with one codebase for iOS and Android, and a Node.js backend on AWS with MongoDB.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The AgResource app built by Appluex uses a single Flutter codebase serving both iOS and Android, with a Node.js backend, PostgreSQL, and AWS delivery infrastructure.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Appluex built a mobile app for AgResource, an agriculture market commentary service, using Flutter with a single codebase serving iOS and Android, backed by a Node.js backend, PostgreSQL, and AWS.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Appluex built AgResource, an agriculture and market data app delivering real-time market commentary with push alerts and tiered daily, weekly, and Plus+ research subscriptions. It has a 5.0-star App Store rating from 5 ratings.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Appluex built the Vexolis mobile app for iOS and Android for drivers and carriers, with load management, live equipment tracking, documents, and real-time sync with the Vexolis logistics platform.

    Agency's own words · appluex.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#4 Jafton55/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · $20 to $200/hour · hourly $20 to $200/hour · 33 claims on file

Evidence for this query11.2/300.3754 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Jafton's blockchain work includes BlockGains App, a crypto portfolio app that lets crypto holders track portfolio activity, get real-time… (jafton.com, claimed); The page lists the Alaska Airlines app among Jafton's successfully developed applications, describing it as an app for booking and… (jafton.com, claimed)
Fit to this query22/250.88Headquartered in Miami (Miami, USA); $20 to $200/hour; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names fintech clients
Capability depth9.8/150.6521 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 4 of 33 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed ($20 to $200/hour); Team size 120+; Process not documented
Reputation1.8/50.3638 third-party reviews at 3.8
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per ciobulletin.com; Sources: ciobulletin.com, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Jafton's blockchain work includes BlockGains App, a crypto portfolio app that lets crypto holders track portfolio activity, get real-time news, and strategize gains.

    Agency's own words · jafton.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The page lists the Alaska Airlines app among Jafton's successfully developed applications, describing it as an app for booking and managing flights with features such as real-time flight status updates, Mileage Plan account management, and mobile check-in.

    Agency's own words · jafton.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Jafton lists the Alaska Airlines app among successfully developed applications; the page describes the app for booking and managing flights, real-time flight status updates, Mileage Plan account management, itinerary access, and mobile check-in with boarding pass.

    Agency's own words · jafton.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Jafton lists the Alaska Airlines app in its portfolio as a successfully developed application for booking and managing flights, with features such as real-time flight status updates, Mileage Plan account management, check-in, and boarding passes on the phone.

    Agency's own words · jafton.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 1 reviews; Trustpilot 3.6 from 7 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#5 TropiDev48/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · From $100/month · projects from $1,500 · 18 claims on file

Evidence for this query8/300.2671 mobile backend and API integration claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; TropiDev built a service scheduling app with third-party API integrations and detailed UX for CleanPro Services FL, per a client review… (tropidev.com, claimed)
Fit to this query25/251Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Retainers from $100/month, inside the mobile backend and API integration band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.5/150.5691 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 1 of 18 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability6.6/100.66In business since 2017; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (From $100/month); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: No independent source on file -3 (Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.); Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • TropiDev built a service scheduling app with third-party API integrations and detailed UX for CleanPro Services FL, per a client review from Robert L.

    Agency's own words · tropidev.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#6 SDSol Technologies47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 17 claims on file

Evidence for this query11/300.3672 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; SDSol developed PADL's fully automated paddleboard rental system, including IoT smart-lock hardware, native iOS and Android mobile apps, a… (sdsol.com, claimed); The vendor lists a project, Carprix, described as P2P real-time vehicle valuations. (sdsol.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth9.7/150.6471 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 17 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 40+; Process not documented
Reputation3.4/50.680999999999999922 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • SDSol developed PADL's fully automated paddleboard rental system, including IoT smart-lock hardware, native iOS and Android mobile apps, a web application, and a backend operating platform.

    Agency's own words · sdsol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The vendor lists a project, Carprix, described as P2P real-time vehicle valuations.

    Agency's own words · sdsol.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 22 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#7 Trango Tech44/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · serves the city from New York, NY, USA · price not disclosed · 22 claims on file

Evidence for this query11/300.3672 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; A client reviewer identified as Jason Tailor, Accountant, says Trango Tech built an app from a rough wireframe and the app has reached 50k… (trangotech.com, claimed); Trango Tech digitalized MatchBox's matchmaking process by building a dating app for Canadian Muslims with an integrated AI-based matching… (trangotech.com, claimed)
Fit to this query15.9/250.635Lists Miami as a service region; headquartered in New York, NY, USA; Pricing not disclosed; Profile names healthcare clients
Capability depth9.2/150.6141 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 2 of 22 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2003; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 100+ developers; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • A client reviewer identified as Jason Tailor, Accountant, says Trango Tech built an app from a rough wireframe and the app has reached 50k downloads with a stable backend.

    Agency's own words · trangotech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Trango Tech digitalized MatchBox's matchmaking process by building a dating app for Canadian Muslims with an integrated AI-based matching system.

    Agency's own words · trangotech.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

#8 Kreante43/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 52 claims on file

Evidence for this query13.5/300.453 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Kreante built SmartCab, a private dispatch app for independent cab drivers and fleet operators in Geneva, which handles AI-powered… (kreante.co, claimed); Kreante built SmartCab, a WhatsApp taxi booking system with an AI engine that processes requests, calculates routes, confirms bookings… (kreante.co, claimed)
Fit to this query15.5/250.62Headquartered in Miami (Miami, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth8.6/150.57200000000000011 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 52 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability4.8/100.48In business since 2020; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 120; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Kreante built SmartCab, a private dispatch app for independent cab drivers and fleet operators in Geneva, which handles AI-powered WhatsApp booking, team dispatch, custom pricing rules, and automated invoicing across three subscription tiers (Lite, Pro, Premium) available on iOS and Android. The build used FlutterFlow, Firebase, and Supabase.

    Agency's own words · kreante.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

  • Kreante built SmartCab, a WhatsApp taxi booking system with an AI engine that processes requests, calculates routes, confirms bookings, and triggers invoicing automatically, plus a dispatch module with real-time driver tracking. It is available on iOS and Android and offers Lite, Pro, and Premium subscription tiers.

    Agency's own words · kreante.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

  • Kreante delivered a payroll and performance management platform for AutoCartel field photographers, built as a native application with Lovable, Python/FastAPI, React and Claude Code.

    Agency's own words · kreante.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

#9 Marotino43/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 38 claims on file

Evidence for this query12.5/300.4173 mobile backend and API integration claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Marotino built the Skillino mental coaching app as the full product team, handling product strategy, UX/UI design, mobile development… (marotino.com, claimed); Marotino built a subscription coworking booking platform for AndCo with real-time availability, Stripe billing, QR/NFC check-in, and a… (marotino.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth9/150.5991 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 3 of 38 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 40+; Process not documented
Reputation1.9/50.377 third-party reviews at 4.1
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: No independent source on file -3 (Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.); Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Marotino built the Skillino mental coaching app as the full product team, handling product strategy, UX/UI design, mobile development, backend infrastructure, and App Store launch.

    Agency's own words · marotino.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Marotino built a subscription coworking booking platform for AndCo with real-time availability, Stripe billing, QR/NFC check-in, and a member web app, built with React.js and Node.js.

    Agency's own words · marotino.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Marotino built a subscription coworking booking platform for AndCo with real-time availability, Stripe billing, QR/NFC check-in, and a member web app, using React.js and Node.js.

    Agency's own words · marotino.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#10 Synergy Labs41/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 19 claims on file

Evidence for this query8/300.2671 mobile backend and API integration claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Synergy Labs lists Flutter and Firebase as the tech stack for Clapper, a social networking app. (synergylabs.co, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth8.5/150.56600000000000011 of 1 listed services are Mobile Development services; 1 of 19 claims on file concern mobile backend and API integration
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation4.3/50.86252 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names mobile backend and API integration work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Synergy Labs lists Flutter and Firebase as the tech stack for Clapper, a social networking app.

    Agency's own words · synergylabs.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 52 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Positions 11 to 12: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.11

A claim counts as backend and API evidence when a source on file names a backend, REST or GraphQL API, cloud setup (Firebase, AWS, Azure) or an integration with another system (payments, CRM, EHR, ERP, hardware) the company built for an app, ideally with the client named.

Terms that count:
api, apis, rest api, graphql, backend, back-end, firebase, aws, azure, microservices, integration, integrations, integrated, stripe, payment integration, real-time, bluetooth
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names mobile backend and API integration work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports mobile backend and API integration under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
Mobile Backend and API Integration 2026.11
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/development/mobile-development/miami/mobile-backend-api-integration

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring