Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #37 SEO for Lead Generation in New York, of 41
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file: small businesses.
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 2 of 4 results with a number do not say what year they were measured.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a SEO for Lead Generation case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #36 2Marketing40Ranks above on this question#36#37 this oneScore4039Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #38 Top New York SEO Company39Ranks below on this question#38#37 this oneScore3939Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Blue Oak Marketing.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#37 SEO for Lead Generation in New York: 39/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 14 | 47% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 12.4 | 50% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 15 | 100% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed4 of 4 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 4 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 3. The full ledger of 4 is on the proof page.
Blue Oak Marketing reports that in the last year it drove over 1 million leads and $71 million in revenue for its clients across SEO and PPC work; the page names no specific client, so the result is aggregate and cannot be attributed to one service.
Agency's own wordsblueoakmktg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin the last yearSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
In the last year, we've driven over 1 million leads and $71 million in revenue for our clients.
For Deathcare Services Organization, Blue Oak Marketing overhauled the Google Ads account, resulting in 902 leads in just 30 days. The company also increased organic traffic by over 300% and implemented a highly targeted social media strategy.
Agency's own wordsblueoakmktg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin just 30 daysSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
From low-quality scores to poor keyword choices and high cost per action Blue Oak was able to overhaul the Google Ads account resulting in 902 leads in just 30 days. Blue Oak has also increased organic traffic by over 300% and implemented a highly targeted social media strategy which includes pre-planning webinars through Facebook.
Blue Oak Marketing overhauled a Deathcare Services Organization's Google Ads account, resulting in 902 leads in 30 days, and increased organic traffic by over 300% while implementing a targeted social media strategy. The results combine Google Ads, SEO, and social media, so they are not attributable to one service.
Agency's own wordsblueoakmktg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Blue Oak was able to overhaul the Google Ads account resulting in 902 leads in just 30 days. Blue Oak has also increased organic traffic by over 300% and implemented a highly targeted social media strategy which includes pre-planning webinars through Facebook.
Blue Oak Marketing worked with a locally owned Transmission Repair Center on a combined Google Ads and SEO engagement, restructuring the ad account, building conversion-optimized landing pages, and rebuilding the site for SEO. Conversions increased by 2,115 (a 213% increase in conversion rate), cost per conversion decreased by 78%, mobile traffic increased by 92%, and total website traffic increased by 67%. Because the engagement combined PPC and SEO, the results are not attributable to one service.
Agency's own wordsblueoakmktg.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The total number of conversions increased by 2,115, which represents a 213% increase in the conversion rate. Furthermore, the cost per conversion decreased by 78%. From an SEO perspective, the Transmission Center site was rebuilt with an emphasis on search engine optimization. Identifying short and long-tail keywords through content creation mobile traffic increased by 92%, a 67% increase in total website traffic.
Positions in every ranking1 ranking
1 position: 1 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 1 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Lead Generation · New Yorkon its own published cases | #37 of 41 | 39 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Buffalo, NY, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- New York, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Deathcare Services OrganizationIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO for Lead Generation $4,500 (23 of 41 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries10/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, setup fee3/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 2 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims12/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 4 of 420/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 415/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO for lead generation work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 4 of 4 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (1 named)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.