Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. 3 of its 7 documented work claims come from an independent source.
Best position #22 Local SEO in Phoenix, of 26 · also in 1 more ranking
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google4.9/5309 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 86% written in the last 12 months
- 2% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 24% of Google reviews answered
86% of the 42 reviews read were written in the last 12 months, on a base of 309 reviews. A pattern like this can be a review drive; read them with that in mind.
Clients overwhelmingly praise Green Thumb Local for successfully reinstating and verifying Google Business Profiles, often after other agencies failed. They value the team's responsiveness, speed, and the 'no results, no pay' guarantee. A few criticisms mention impersonal email communication and one client reported significant damage from untested implementations.More
- Success in reinstating/verifying Google Business Profile29
- Speed and efficiency11
“Just had my GBP reinstated in less than a week by green thumb local.”
Show 1 more quoteHide quotes
“within a week and a half I had ownership back.”
- Impersonal email communication1
- Untested implementations causing damage1
“I never knew who I was speaking with as it all came from one email and it didn't feel very personal.”
Show 1 more quoteHide quotes
“They implemented things they didn’t test first and ended up costing me clients and opportunities.”
Show 1 more resultHide results
- Google Business Profile reinstatement/verification29
- Website design/redesign2
- Cleaning service
- Auto tag business
- Taxi business
- Roofing company
- Home renovation company
Show 4 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“I first hired Green Thumb in May 2026. Our website was dated and it needed a serious face lift. They were able to redesign it and create a new one pretty quickly. We also started using the website form and we get a lot more leads than we did before. We also did a rebrand recently and when I sent them the branding guidelines, they updated it within four days.”
“Green Thumb finally got my business AND reviews put back up on Google. ... Green Thumb worked with me to get it all back up and running.”
“Green Thumb Local takes care of my website for my business. Jeremiah and Josh are always very helpful and working to optimize my website.”
“Green Thumb worked with me to get it all back up and running. Thanks to them, I can get back to my marketing as there is no way I could without being able to refer people to my Google reviews.”
- Your business is in the industries on file: home services.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Google Business Profile reinstatement/verification (29 of 31 mentions); Website design/redesign (2).
- Read the criticism first: "Impersonal email communication" (1 of 42 reviews read).
- Read the criticism first: "Untested implementations causing damage" (1 of 42 reviews read).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- Ask who will do the work day to day and whether any of it is outsourced.
- #21 PrimeView43Ranks above on this question#21#22 this oneScore4343Independent01Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #23 SiteRyze Digital Marketing42Ranks below on this question#23#22 this oneScore4243Independent01Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Green Thumb Local.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#22 Local SEO in Phoenix: 43/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 12 | 40% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.6 | 64% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 4.9 | 98% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed7 of 8 on file · 3 of 7 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 8 claims on file: independent source 4 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 42.9%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Local SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 8 is on the proof page.
A reviewer says Green Thumb Local helped reinstate their Google Business Profile listing and restore its reviews in just a few weeks.
Independent sourcereportgarden.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workin just a few weeksLocal SEOQuote from the source page
My Google Business Profile was suspended. I watched 100 hours of videos and read everything on the internet to try and figure out how to get my listing back. I jumped through every hoop, appealed twice, and was not approved. The stress was overwhelming. Then I found Green Thumb Local. Now my listing is back up, my reviews have been restored, and the weight that was lifted off my shoulders was a relief that I cannot possibly explain. They turned it all around in just a few weeks.
A reviewer says Green Thumb Local resolved an issue with their business account in 5 days.
Independent sourcereportgarden.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workin 5 daysQuote from the source page
I have been trying for 4 months trying to recover from Google's locking out my business account. Google stated i could no longer appeal. Green Thumb Local solved it in 5 days!
A reviewer says Green Thumb Local helped get their page back with its reviews intact after it was down for exactly 6 days.
Independent sourcereportgarden.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workexactly 6 daysQuote from the source page
Our page was down exactly 6 days. We were very concerned with having over 600 five star reviews that we would never get it back. She kept us patient and up to date on everything that was going on. We can’t thank this team enough for helping us get our page back with the reviews in tact!!
A client named Sean Moffett reports that Green Thumb Local redesigned his dated website and that after also starting to use the website form the business gets a lot more leads than before; he also says the vendor updated the site with new branding guidelines within four days.
Agency's own wordsgreenthumblocal.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workMay 2026SEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
I first hired Green Thumb in May 2026. Our website was dated and it needed a serious face lift. They were able to redesign it and create a new one pretty quickly. We also started using the website form and we get a lot more leads than we did before. We also did a rebrand recently and when I sent them the branding guidelines, they updated it within four days.
A client named James Stanton reports that Green Thumb Local worked with him over months to get his business profile and reviews restored on Google after Google repeatedly took them down.
Agency's own wordsgreenthumblocal.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Green Thumb finally got my business AND reviews put back up on Google. ... Green Thumb worked with me to get it all back up and running.
A client named Jennifer F. reports that Green Thumb Local takes care of her business website and works to optimize it.
Agency's own wordsgreenthumblocal.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workOctober 14Quote from the source page
Green Thumb Local takes care of my website for my business. Jeremiah and Josh are always very helpful and working to optimize my website.
A client named James Stanton states Green Thumb worked with him over months to get his business page and reviews restored on Google after Google repeatedly took them down over verification issues.
Agency's own wordsgreenthumblocal.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes work1 month agoQuote from the source page
Green Thumb worked with me to get it all back up and running. Thanks to them, I can get back to my marketing as there is no way I could without being able to refer people to my Google reviews.
Positions in every ranking2 rankings
2 positions: 2 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 2 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · Phoenix | #22 of 26 | 43 | 1 (1 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Phoenixon its own published cases | #23 of 27 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- Home ServicesVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Sean Moffett, James StantonIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
The Local SEO band tops out at $6,000/month; this vendor does not publish a monthly floor.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $1,495 (12 of 26 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $1,495 (11 of 27 disclose)
Reputation
- Google4.9 · 309 reviews
How it counts: 309 third-party reviews at 4.9. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedModerate confidence
- Confidence
- Moderate confidence, 78 of 100
- Evidence posture
- adequate: Usable as shortlist context: 3 of 7 documented work claims come from independent sources; check the sources before outreach.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is High confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: client types10/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 7 work claims11/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 3 of 7 work claims are independent30/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 7 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source22/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 7 of 813/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Independent proof of work is present (3 of 7 work claims); still check the sources for buyer fit.
- 3 of 7 documented work claims come from independent sources; the rest are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Best position rests on: Confirmed by an independent source.
- 4 of 8 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 4 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (7 of 8)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (2 named)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Cite with the source context
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.