Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #111 Ecommerce SEO in Atlanta, of 112 · also in 5 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses) and the industries on file (healthcare, real estate, legal).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #110 Rook Digital22Ranks above on this question#110#111 this oneScore2221Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #112 Digital Media Ninja19Ranks below on this question#112#111 this oneScore1921Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for KO Websites.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#111 Ecommerce SEO in Atlanta: 21/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 6 | 20% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 6.8 | 27% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.8 | 65% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed7 of 7 on file · 0 of 7 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 7 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 7. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Ecommerce SEO 1. The full ledger of 7 is on the proof page.
A client identified as Gregory c. says KO created and launched a website for his airshow business. He reports reaching #1 in many Google and Yahoo search categories and the first page for the rest, and placing 3rd in the website category of the ICAS marketing competition.
Agency's own wordsko-websites.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workearly September; by the time SF Fleet Week hit; this week at the ICAS conventionQuote from the source page
Step back to early September, I wanted a new site for my airshow biz. KO had me up and running faster that I could start my jet engines. Ken and his crew did an awesome job! By the time SF Fleet Week hit, I was #1 on many categories on Google and Yahoo search engines and on the first page on everything else, better than I could have imagined. On top of that, this week at the ICAS (International Council of Airshows) convention, I placed 3rd out of all airshow performers for best marketing in the website category! 5 stars. Their pricing was very competitive as well, so it was a bargain in my eyes as it did more than I expected.
Irv A says the client partnered with KO Websites for 5 years and describes its web hosting services and support. The review reports seamless performance and reliability, but gives no quantified result.
Agency's own wordsko-websites.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workJun 5, 2024Quote from the source page
I've been incredibly impressed with KO Website's services since we partnered with them 5 years ago! Their extensive web hosting expertise is evident in the seamless performance and reliability of their hosting solutions. The support team is outstanding, always available and ready to assist with any issues. Their quick response time ensures that any concerns are promptly addressed, minimizing downtime and keeping our website running smoothly, compliant and looking its bests.
KO Websites built a WordPress and WooCommerce e-commerce website for Groomers Direct Nor Cal, adding supplier purchase-order generation, inventory updates tied to sales, and data export for COGS and tax reporting.
Agency's own wordsko-websites.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workNovember 3, 2025Ecommerce SEOQuote from the source page
Behind the scenes we built out additional modules so Groomers Direct Nor Cal can manage supplier purchase orders (POs), track inventory, and align cost-of-goods-sold (COGS) and tax-reporting workflows. Because in a professional-supplies business it’s not just about selling, it’s about managing inventory turn, understanding margins, and feeding data into accounting and tax systems. With WooCommerce as the foundation, we extended the system to support supplier PO generation, inventory status updates tied to sales, and back-end data export for COGS and tax reporting.
Thor S says KO Websites provided digital marketing consulting and helped convey the client's updated value proposition to its audience. The client also describes ongoing marketing campaign support and regular alignment and content development sessions.
Agency's own wordsko-websites.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMar 9, 2025Quote from the source page
KO is our digital marketing expert consultant and they have greatly helped to convey to our audience our updated value proposition. We rely on them to help us with all aspects of our marketing campaigns. We have developed a good way-of-working with regular alignment and content development sessions. Great work!
Dave at MM, Walnut Creek says the client liked the new website design and load speed, and that KO's team did a good job.
Agency's own wordsko-websites.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workFeb 26, 2016Quote from the source page
Loving the new web design and load speed. Your team did a great job!
KO Websites states that it recently launched a website for Ben’s Roofing Oakland, including full SEO.
Agency's own wordsko-websites.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Here are two websites we’ve recently launched for Oakland clients, including full SEO: Ben’s Roofing Oakland
KO Websites states that it recently launched a website for Element Home Solutions, including full SEO.
Agency's own wordsko-websites.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Here are two websites we’ve recently launched for Oakland clients, including full SEO: Element Home Solutions
Positions in every ranking6 rankings
6 positions: 6 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #111 of 112 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #111 of 112 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #111 of 112 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #112 of 112 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #104 of 112 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
1 more positionHide the other 1
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #111 of 112 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Oakland, CA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- San Francisco, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, Real Estate, Legal, Home Services, Dental, Technology, Life Sciences, Financial Services, RestaurantsVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Gregory c. Hercules, Groomers Direct Nor Cal, Dave at MM, Walnut Creek., Ben’s Roofing Oakland, Element Home SolutionsIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- Chinese, Spanish, Korean, RussianVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 2 cases with a named client and a result, 7 work claims15/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 7 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 7 confirmed, 0 partly, of 7 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 7 of 715/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names ecommerce SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 7 of 7 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (2 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 7 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.