Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #18 SEO for Lead Generation in Phoenix, of 27
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Published on the agency's own site. Each quote carries a badge saying where it comes from.
Clients consistently praise the agency's responsiveness and direct access to the owner Steve, along with SEO, web design and Google Maps work that improved their rankings, leads and sales. Several report long-term relationships lasting years and results matching what was promised. There is no criticism in any review; all reviews are strongly positive.More
- Responsiveness and availability12
- SEO and rankings expertise9
- Website design and revisions8
- Clear and frequent communication7
- Delivering on time and as promised3
“He always answers his phone and answers all of our questions.”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“Steve at LinkHelpers is tenacious when it comes to SEO and SEO strategy”
“My website was professionally designed and executed quickly”
“Great communication throughout.”
“produced what he said he would in the timeframe he said it would happen”
No criticism in the quotes read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- SEO11
- Web design and website development9
- Google Maps optimization3
- Lead generation2
- Email services1
- Med spa
- Dentist
- Mobile dog grooming business
- Home inspector
- Tree service business
Show 2 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“We've been working with LinkHelpers for 8 years now — because they do what they say they're going to do. The lead generation program they built us accounts for nearly 100% of our new business and lifetime clients.”
“After contacting Phoenix SEO the work began, slowly but surely they got my listing to rank top 3 in my market.”
- Your business matches the client types on file: local service businesses.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO (11 of 26 mentions); Web design and website development (9).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a SEO for Lead Generation case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #17 PrimeView45Ranks above on this question#17#18 this oneScore4545Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #19 HVSEO41Ranks below on this question#19#18 this oneScore4145Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Link Helpers.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#18 SEO for Lead Generation in Phoenix: 45/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 9 | 30% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 13.8 | 92% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 5 | 100% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed2 of 2 on file · 0 of 2 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 2 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 2. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 2 is on the proof page.
Client Michael Visnov, VP of Echelon Protection & Surveillance, states in a Google review that Echelon has worked with LinkHelpers for 8 years and that the lead generation program LinkHelpers built accounts for nearly 100% of the company's new business and lifetime clients.
Agency's own wordslinkhelpers.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
We've been working with LinkHelpers for 8 years now, because they do what they say they're going to do. The lead generation program they built us accounts for nearly 100% of our new business and lifetime clients.
Client Angel Maquitico, a local business owner, states in a Google review that after contacting Phoenix SEO (Link Helpers), his listing was ranked top 3 in his market.
Agency's own wordslinkhelpers.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
After contacting Phoenix SEO the work began, slowly but surely they got my listing to rank top 3 in my market.
Positions in every ranking1 ranking
1 position: 1 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 1 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Lead Generation · Phoenixon its own published cases | #18 of 27 | 45 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- local_service_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Echelon Protection & Surveillance, Local Business OwnerIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO for Lead Generation $1,495 (11 of 27 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: 98 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries10/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 2 work claims6/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 2 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 2 confirmed, 0 partly, of 2 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 1 of 120/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 2 of 215/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO for lead generation work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Fewer than three external evidence claims are normalized.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 2 of 2 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 2 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (2 named)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 1, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.