Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #7 Local SEO in Phoenix, of 26 · also in 10 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/521 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 25% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 100% of Google reviews answered
Clients overwhelmingly value Sandra's deep expertise in Google Business Profile recovery, website and email rescue, and local SEO, often describing her as responsive, attentive, and going above and beyond. All reviews are positive, with no criticism mentioned. The consistency is strong, highlighting measurable improvements in rankings, traffic, and calls, alongside reasonable pricing.More
- exceptional expertise and knowledge5
- clear and responsive communication3
- goes above and beyond3
- reasonable pricing3
- genuine care and personal attention3
“she’s the best professional I have ever come across”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“Easy, clear communication, technical detail, and responsiveness”
“go the extra mile to ensure your brand gets attention”
“fees are reasonable”
“she took the time to understand the why”
No criticism in the 20 reviews read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- website development and design4
- SEO and Google Business Profile management3
- domain, email, and website rescue3
- ranking improvement2
- local business owner
- electrical contractor
- professional services client
Show 6 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“I went from barely getting any calls to being in the top 3 on Google Maps. Sandra knows her stuff.”
“We had a mess with our listings and our website. She saved our domain, email, and helped us climb back to page one.”
“I reached out after a very stressful situation with my Google Business Profile. My business had built strong local visibility over many years, but after a suspension and duplicate profile issue, my Google Maps presence changed dramatically and I was struggling to understand what happened.”
“Sandra is amazing, had a major problem with our Google Business Page/Storefront, she eased my mind from the start and came through as she said she would, I highly recommend her services!”
““I went from barely getting any calls to being in the top 3 on Google Maps. Sandra knows her stuff.” — Local Business Owner, Chandler AZ”
““We had a mess with our listings and our website. She saved our domain, email, and helped us climb back to page one.” — Professional Services Client, Gilbert AZ”
- Your business matches the client types on file (local businesses, small businesses) and the industries on file (small business, local business).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: website development and design (4 of 12 mentions); SEO and Google Business Profile management (3).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #6 Signa Marketing61Ranks above on this question#6#7 this oneScore6158Independent00PriceProjects from $5,000not disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #8 Fasturtle58Ranks below on this question#8#7 this oneScore5858Independent00PriceProjects from $1,000not disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Local SEO Today.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#7 Local SEO in Phoenix: 58/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 15 | 50% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 15 | 100% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 3.4 | 68% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed7 of 8 on file · 0 of 7 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 8 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 7. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Local SEO 4 · SEO for Marketplaces 2 · SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 8 is on the proof page.
A local business owner in Chandler, AZ reports going from barely getting any calls to being in the top 3 on Google Maps after working with the vendor. The page does not name the client or the time period.
Agency's own wordslocalseotoday.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
I went from barely getting any calls to being in the top 3 on Google Maps. Sandra knows her stuff.
A professional services client in Gilbert, AZ reports the vendor fixed problems with their listings and website, and helped them climb back to page one.
Agency's own wordslocalseotoday.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO for MarketplacesQuote from the source page
We had a mess with our listings and our website. She saved our domain, email, and helped us climb back to page one.
A client reported a Google Business Profile suspension and duplicate profile issue that dramatically changed their Google Maps presence.
Agency's own wordslocalseotoday.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
I reached out after a very stressful situation with my Google Business Profile. My business had built strong local visibility over many years, but after a suspension and duplicate profile issue, my Google Maps presence changed dramatically and I was struggling to understand what happened.
A client identified only as a Local Business Owner in Chandler AZ reports that after working with Local SEO Today their phone calls increased and they reached the top 3 on Google Maps.
Agency's own wordslocalseotoday.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
“I went from barely getting any calls to being in the top 3 on Google Maps. Sandra knows her stuff.”, Local Business Owner, Chandler AZ
A client named Brady left a five-star review stating his Google Business Profile was taken down and his business dropped by roughly 90 percent almost overnight, and that Sandra at Local SEO Today guided him step by step over several months on handling the suspension himself.
Agency's own wordslocalseotoday.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
When Google took down our Google Business Profile, our business dropped by roughly 90 percent almost overnight.
A client reported a major problem with their Google Business Page/Storefront and said Sandra eased their mind from the start and came through as she said she would.
Agency's own wordslocalseotoday.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Sandra is amazing, had a major problem with our Google Business Page/Storefront, she eased my mind from the start and came through as she said she would, I highly recommend her services!
A Professional Services Client in Gilbert AZ reports that the vendor helped fix problems with their listings and website and that they climbed back to page one.
Agency's own wordslocalseotoday.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workSEO for MarketplacesQuote from the source page
“We had a mess with our listings and our website. She saved our domain, email, and helped us climb back to page one.”, Professional Services Client, Gilbert AZ
Positions in every ranking11 rankings
11 positions: 11 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #7 of 26 | 58 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Phoenixon its own published cases | #19 of 53 | 45 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · New Yorkon its own published cases | #31 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Miamion its own published cases | #32 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Dallason its own published cases | #33 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
6 more positionsHide the other 6
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Marketplaces · Atlantaon its own published cases | #31 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Houstonon its own published cases | #31 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #31 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Chicagoon its own published cases | #33 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Seattleon its own published cases | #33 of 53 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Phoenixon its own published cases | #21 of 27 | 40 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Phoenix, AZ, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Phoenix, AZ, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- local_business, small_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Small Business, Local BusinessVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Local Business Owner, Chandler AZ, Professional Services Client, Gilbert AZ, Dani, Nick, BradyIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
The Local SEO band tops out at $6,000/month; this vendor does not publish a monthly floor.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $1,495 (12 of 26 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $1,495 (11 of 27 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 21 reviews
How it counts: 21 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2011Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size16/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, setup fee3/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 7 work claims7/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 7 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 7 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source22/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 7 of 813/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 7 of 8 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (7 of 8)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 7 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.