Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #29 Ecommerce SEO in Los Angeles, of 31 · also in 6 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/533 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 14% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 100% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise Marketing 1on1 for effective SEO, strong communication, and tangible outcomes like higher rankings and increased leads. No criticisms appear in any review, and nearly all ratings are five stars, indicating a high level of satisfaction.More
- SEO results and rankings17
- Communication and responsiveness9
- Local SEO expertise5
- Customer service and helpfulness5
- Web design quality3
“catapulted my website to the top of search engine results”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“able to connect with their team without any delays or holds”
“helped us optimize our Google My Business listing”
“very helpful and totally efficient”
“The finished output far exceeded my expectations”
No criticism in the 28 reviews read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- SEO11
- Local SEO5
- Web design4
- Digital marketing4
- Social media marketing1
- yoga studio
- restaurant
- law firm
- boutique clothing store
- small family owned business
- service business
Show 4 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“They got my new site up and running that was SEO optimized and in a matter of weeks I had tons of traffic and consistently ranked high on Google searches.”
“Helped my service business show up on the first page in just 3 months.”
“After a few weeks, I saw a rise of customers coming to our site and purchasing something. Our social media platforms now have tons of engagement.”
“Then in a matter of days, I was getting all sorts of traffic and I was now ranking first on certain searches related to my business.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (ecommerce brands, SaaS companies, B2B companies) and the industries on file (ecommerce, saas, healthcare).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO (11 of 25 mentions); Local SEO (5).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #28 B2BSEO.io41Ranks above on this question#28#29 this oneScore4140Independent00PriceProjects from $1,000not disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases
- #30 Los Angeles SEO Group38Ranks below on this question#30#29 this oneScore3840Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Marketing 1on1.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#29 Ecommerce SEO in Los Angeles: 40/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 6 | 20% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.6 | 71% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 3.8 | 76% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed4 of 5 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Ecommerce SEO 1. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
Client Charlotte Wilson says Marketing 1on1 helped her service business show up on the first page in 3 months.
Agency's own wordsmarketing1on1.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work2 months agoQuote from the source page
Helped my service business show up on the first page in just 3 months.
Client Zac Stanton says Marketing 1on1 built his new site SEO-optimized and that within weeks he had significant traffic and consistently ranked high on Google searches.
Agency's own wordsmarketing1on1.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work3 weeks agoQuote from the source page
They got my new site up and running that was SEO optimized and in a matter of weeks I had tons of traffic and consistently ranked high on Google searches.
Client Samantha Conley, who runs an online store, says that after Marketing 1on1 worked on her site and social media marketing plan, she saw more customers coming to the site and purchasing within a few weeks; the result spans SEO, social media, and digital marketing.
Agency's own wordsmarketing1on1.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work3 weeks agoEcommerce SEOQuote from the source page
After a few weeks, I saw a rise of customers coming to our site and purchasing something. Our social media platforms now have tons of engagement.
Client Genesis Woodward says that after approaching Marketing 1on1 for help with site traffic, she was getting various traffic and ranking first on certain searches related to her business within days.
Agency's own wordsmarketing1on1.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes work3 weeks agoQuote from the source page
Then in a matter of days, I was getting all sorts of traffic and I was now ranking first on certain searches related to my business.
Positions in every ranking7 rankings
7 positions: 7 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce SEO · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #29 of 31 | 40 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #95 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #96 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #96 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #99 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
2 more positionsHide the other 2
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #95 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #95 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Los Angeles, CA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Los Angeles, CA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- ecommerce, saas, b2b, enterprise, small_business, healthcare, legalVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, SaaS, Healthcare, Legal, Dental, RestaurantsVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Charlotte Wilson, Zac Stanton, Samantha Conley, Genesis WoodwardIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Ecommerce SEO $3,000 (24 of 31 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 33 reviews
How it counts: 33 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size12/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims8/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 1 platform with a rating and 10 or more reviews8/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source20/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 512/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names ecommerce SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 4 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (4 of 5)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 1, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.