Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #11 Enterprise SEO in Los Angeles, of 11 · also in 39 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- 100% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 0% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise the agency as the best in the industry, highlighting white-glove service, creativity, and a results-driven approach. Testimonials report significant increases in organic leads and service calls. No criticisms were mentioned across the reviews.More
- Best SEO company5
- Measurable lead growth2
- White-glove service1
- Creative and results-driven1
- Personal service1
“The best SEO company in the city”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“From page 4 to top-3 for 18 high-intent local keywords.”
“they treat you with white gloves service”
“Very creative and results driven”
“Yoseph is not just an amazing guy”
No criticism in the 5 reviews read.
- SEO7
- Construction company
- Med spa
- HVAC company
Show 2 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“Culver City Med Spa 5 months +428% organic leads From page 4 to top-3 for 18 high-intent local keywords.”
“Local HVAC Company 90 days +312% service calls Went from invisible to 9-pack dominant across 6 West Side ZIPs.”
- Your business looks like the reviewers': construction company; med spa; hVAC company.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO (7 of 7 mentions).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 5 of 10 results with a number do not say what year they were measured.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for an Enterprise SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #9 JH SEO Agency48Ranks above on this question#9#11 this oneScore4837Independent00PriceFrom $2,500/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases
- #10 Brenton Way48Ranks above on this question#10#11 this oneScore4837Independent00PriceProjects from $5,000not disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Los Angeles SEO Group.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#11 Enterprise SEO in Los Angeles: 37/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 12.4 | 50% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.1 | 61% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 7.2 | 72% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 1.9 | 38% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed10 of 11 on file · 0 of 10 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 11 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 10. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 4 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 4 · Local SEO 2 · Technical SEO 1 · Ecommerce SEO 1 · Content-led SEO 1 · B2B SaaS SEO 1 · Enterprise SEO 1. The full ledger of 11 is on the proof page.
Los Angeles SEO Group reports that for a client it names as Culver City Med Spa, over 5 months it moved the client from page 4 to top-3 rankings for 18 high-intent local keywords and grew organic leads by 428%. The client quote states: 'We had to hire two more estheticians. Wild.'
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes work5 monthsSEO for Lead GenerationSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
Culver City Med Spa 5 months +428% organic leads From page 4 to top-3 for 18 high-intent local keywords.
Los Angeles SEO Group reports that for a client it names as Local HVAC Company, within 90 days the business went from invisible to 9-pack dominant across 6 West Side ZIP codes and grew service calls by 312%. The client quote states: 'Phone hasn't stopped ringing since month two.'
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes work90 daysQuote from the source page
Local HVAC Company 90 days +312% service calls Went from invisible to 9-pack dominant across 6 West Side ZIPs.
Los Angeles SEO Group reports that it helped Culver City Med Spa reach the top three for 18 high-intent local keywords, with organic leads increasing 428% over five months.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes work5 monthsSEO for Lead GenerationSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
Culver City Med Spa 5 months +428% organic leads From page 4 to top-3 for 18 high-intent local keywords.
Los Angeles SEO Group reports ranking West LA Law Firm first for the Culver City personal injury lawyer term and 22 related terms, with $184K in new revenue over seven months.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes work7 monthsSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
West LA Law Firm 7 months $184K new revenue Ranked #1 for 'Culver City personal injury lawyer' and 22 sister terms.
Los Angeles SEO Group reports that a local HVAC company became dominant in the 9-pack across six West Side ZIP codes and increased service calls by 312% in 90 days.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes work90 daysQuote from the source page
Local HVAC Company 90 days +312% service calls Went from invisible to 9-pack dominant across 6 West Side ZIPs.
Los Angeles SEO Group ran a local SEO campaign for Sunset Boulevard Retail Chain. Store visits increased by 215%, Google Maps views by 340%, and the client had 21 local keywords ranked #1-3.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
Local SEO Sunset Boulevard Retail Chain A multi-location retail business struggling with local visibility saw a 215% increase in store visits after our local SEO campaign, outranking major competitors for valuable local keywords. 215% +215% Increase in Store Visits 11,600 +340% Google Maps Views #1-3 +21 Keywords Local Keyword Rankings
Los Angeles SEO Group used an SEO strategy for Canyon Healthcare Provider. Organic traffic increased by 189%, new patient inquiries by 127%, and 47 keywords reached the first page.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
Healthcare SEO Canyon Healthcare Provider A healthcare provider with multiple locations across LA County needed to improve their online presence and patient acquisition. Our comprehensive SEO strategy delivered exceptional results. 189% +189% Organic Traffic 127% +127% New Patient Inquiries 76 +47 Keywords First Page Keywords
Los Angeles SEO Group used a local restaurant SEO strategy for Santa Monica Restaurant Group, which has 5 locations. Online reservations increased by 164%, and local search visibility increased by 258%.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
Restaurant SEO Santa Monica Restaurant Group A restaurant group with 5 locations in the Santa Monica area was struggling to attract diners through organic search. Our local restaurant SEO strategy increased bookings and foot traffic significantly. 164% +164% Online Reservations 258% +258% Local Search Visibility
Los Angeles SEO Group used technical SEO and content strategy for Silicon Beach E-commerce Platform. Organic revenue increased by 326%, and shopping traffic increased by 215%.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workTechnical SEOEcommerce SEOContent-led SEOQuote from the source page
E-commerce SEO Silicon Beach E-commerce Platform An e-commerce startup based in the Silicon Beach area was struggling to compete with established brands. Our technical SEO and content strategy helped them capture valuable market share. 326% +326% Organic Revenue 215% +215% Shopping Traffic
Los Angeles SEO Group used a tech SEO strategy for Pasadena Tech Startup, a B2B SaaS startup. Enterprise leads increased by 218%, and demo requests by 176%.
Agency's own wordslosangelesseogroup.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workB2B SaaS SEOEnterprise SEOSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Technology SEO Pasadena Tech Startup A B2B SaaS startup based in Pasadena needed to increase their visibility to enterprise clients. Our tech SEO strategy helped them rank for high-value, high-intent keywords in their niche. 218% +218% Enterprise Leads 176% +176% Demo Requests
Positions in every ranking40 rankings
40 positions: 40 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #18 of 49 | 44 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #21 of 35 | 49 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #31 of 34 | 48 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #37 of 50 | 43 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #20 of 20 | 43 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
35 more positionsHide the other 35
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #31 of 37 | 38 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #11 of 11 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #18 of 18 | 38 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #20 of 20 | 38 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #26 of 26 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #30 of 31 | 38 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #45 of 53 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #45 of 53 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #47 of 53 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #65 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #65 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #65 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #65 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #65 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #66 of 88 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #67 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #67 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #88 of 115 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #92 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #93 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #94 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #97 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #45 of 53 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #46 of 54 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #64 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #65 of 88 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #66 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #68 of 87 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #89 of 116 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #89 of 115 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #92 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #92 of 112 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Culver City, CA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Los Angeles, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Culver City Med Spa, Local HVAC Company, West LA Law Firm, Sunset Boulevard Retail Chain, Canyon Healthcare Provider, Santa Monica Restaurant Group, Silicon Beach E-commerce Platform, Pasadena Tech StartupIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Enterprise SEO $5,000 (10 of 11 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $3,000 (34 of 49 disclose) · Content-led SEO $4,000 (17 of 18 disclose) · Local SEO $2,750 (16 of 20 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,550 (18 of 20 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $2,800 (29 of 35 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (23 of 26 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,000 (24 of 31 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $3,000 (28 of 34 disclose) · Local SEO $2,500 (23 of 37 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $2,600 (34 of 50 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 88 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 54 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 88 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 5 reviews
How it counts: 5 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2015Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size, logo14/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, setup fee3/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 10 cases with a named client and a result, 10 work claims30/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 10 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 10 confirmed, 0 partly, of 11 with a source23/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 10 of 1020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 10 of 1114/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names enterprise SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 10 of 11 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (10 of 11)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 10 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.