Vendar
AI vendor intelligence
Vendar
AI vendor intelligence
Blog
Find Match
  • 570agency profiles
  • 232ranking pages
  • 86open to search
  • 9cities
  • Nov 5 03:03 UTCupdated
  • 2026.11.7model
The Vendar standard

Rankings built on documented work, not on who pays

Cases, reviews and sources form the record. Every position starts with evidence you can inspect.

  • Ranked on documented work
    01 / Evidence
  • No paid placements
    02 / Independence
  • Every fact has a date and a source
    03 / Traceability
  • Same data for people and AI
    04 / Access
Explore
SEOMobile DevelopmentFind MatchShortlistMap
Method
How we rankEditorial policyHow we make moneyBlogVendor checklist
For agencies
ParticipateCorrect your data
For AI
Machine-readable datallms.txt
© 2026 Vendar.org
AboutPrivacyContact
MarketingSEOSeattleB2B / SaaS
Seattle / B2B SaaS SEO

B2B SaaS SEO Agencies Serving Seattle (2026)

87 agencies are ranked on documented B2B SaaS SEO work: 1 based in or serving Seattle and 86 from other cities, marked as such; 4 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 87 SEO agencies for B2B SaaS SEO in Seattle, 1 of them local: the ones with documented B2B SaaS SEO work on file, verified through September 2026. The top three by evidence-weighted score are AlchemyLeads (64/100), Directive (59) and HawkSEM (59). 1 of them has documented B2B SaaS SEO work for clients in Seattle itself. No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 21 Seattle SEO agencies have no B2B SaaS SEO claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1AlchemyLeads 64 · Projects from $5,000 · clients 4.8/5 (34)4 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 1 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites
  2. 2Directive 59 · From $6,000/month · clients 3.2/5 (1)6 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  3. 3HawkSEM 59 · From $1,515/month · clients 4.9/5 (47)3 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in Seattle: disclosed monthly floors run from $199 to $20,000, median $2,600; 49 of 87 disclose a price.

87 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
ForPays
1
AlchemyLeads logo

AlchemyLeads

Calabasas, CA, USA · team 10-49 · since 2017

national coverage · Projects from $5,000 · clients 4.8/5 (34) Agency's own published cases

Sean Chaudhary is a link building specialist whose niche is B2B SEO. (Independent source, statsdrone.com)

Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

64/100
Confidence not rated yet
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
2
Directive logo

Directive

Irvine, CA, USA · team 130+ · since 2013

national coverage · From $6,000/month · clients 3.2/5 (1) Agency's own published cases

…realignment in the B2B technology sector, reporting a 59% pipeline increase, a 300% boost in ROI, and a 109% increase in closed/won revenue quarter over… (Agency's own words, directiveconsulting.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

59/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
3
HawkSEM logo

HawkSEM

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 10-49 · since 2006

national coverage · From $1,515/month · clients 4.9/5 (47) Agency's own published cases

Datadog, a B2B SaaS company, increased sales demos by 75% while drastically cutting CPA through paid search, remarketing, and SEO. The result spans… (Agency's own words, hawksem.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

59/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Apr 2026
View profile
4
Marcel Digital logo

Marcel Digital

Chicago, IL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2003

national coverage · From $6,000/month · clients 4.7/5 (42) Agency's own published cases

Marcel Digital's own B2B SaaS SEO case study for Medius, a spend management and AP automation software company, describes aligning SEO with its ideal… (Agency's own words, marceldigital.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

58/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
5
Comrade Digital Marketing logo

Comrade Digital Marketing

Chicago, IL, USA · team 100+ · since 2008

national coverage · From $1,450/month · clients 4.7/5 (116) Agency's own published cases

…The client's testimonial credits SEO for a move from sporadic calls to a consistent monthly pipeline. (Agency's own words, comradeweb.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

56/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
6
Orbit Media logo

Orbit Media

Chicago, IL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2001

national coverage · From $4,500/month · clients 4.9/5 (48) Agency's own published cases

Orbit Media's own case study for Experity, a software company selling EMR software to urgent care clinics, reports a 91% year-over-year increase in demo requests and a 25-position gain in average ranking for priority keywo… (Agency's own words, orbitmedia.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

56/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
7
Striventa logo

Striventa

Glendale, AZ, USA · team 2-9 · since 2013

national coverage · $150 - $199/hour · clients 5.0/5 (21) Agency's own published cases

…digital marketing, a custom website, sales consulting, and pipeline management. (Agency's own words, striventa.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

56/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
8
Coalition Technologies logo

Coalition Technologies

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 250+ · since 2009

national coverage · From $1,800/month · clients 4.7/5 (281) Agency's own published cases

Coalition Technologies' case study for Microsoft's Bing Maps Platform, a B2B software company product for enterprise developers, describes keyword… (Agency's own words, coalitiontechnologies.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

56/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
9
Visible Factors logo

Visible Factors

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 10-49 · since 2014

national coverage · Projects from $5,000 Agency's own published cases

A case study reports SaaS SEO work for Heymarket with a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ Top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY traffic growth. (Agency's own words, visiblefactors.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

54/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
10
VisualFizz logo

VisualFizz

Chicago, IL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2017

national coverage · From $5,000/month · clients 5.0/5 (44) Agency's own published cases

VisualFizz's own B2B SaaS SEO case study for Wise Systems, a dispatch and routing software company, describes technical cleanup, redirect mapping after a… (Agency's own words, visualfizz.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

54/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
365 more agencies considered without externally confirmed B2B SaaS SEO work, 21 of them serving Seattle

This is an absence of evidence, not a quality rating.

One sourced claim moves an agency into the ranking.

No B2B SaaS SEO claim on file yet. (358)

  • 10Tier.comprice n/a
  • 1MDEprice n/a
  • 222 Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • 97 Switchprice n/a
  • 9th Street Mediaprice n/a
  • Acadiaprice n/a
  • Accelerate Phoenix SEOprice n/a
  • Actuate Mediaprice n/a
  • AdceteraProjects from $25,000
  • Add3price n/a
  • AditProjects from $10,000
  • AdsRoleFrom $399/month
  • AdvertasProjects from $5,000
  • Affordable Imageprice n/a
  • AlgoWithYouprice n/a
  • All Day Web Design & Hostingprice n/a
  • Allevi8 Marketingprice n/a
  • AMM Firmprice n/a
  • AmsiveFrom $8,000/month
  • Anderson Collaborativeprice n/a
  • Anthony's Agencyprice n/a
  • Apex Digital Media$100-$149/hour
  • Appture Digital MediaProjects from $7,500
  • Ardorc Consulting & Marketing Servicesprice n/a
  • Area Code Agencyprice n/a
  • ASTOUNDZFrom $1,495/month
  • Atlanta Ecommerce Agencyprice n/a
  • Atomic Socialprice n/a
  • AumcoreFrom $6,000/month
  • Avenue 25Projects from $1,000
  • AvexFrom $6,000/month
  • Avidon Marketing GroupFrom $3,000/month
  • AVINTIVProjects from $5,000
  • B2B AlliesFrom $699/month
  • Bayarea SEO Firmprice n/a
  • Bear SEOFrom $1,250/month
  • Bellevue SEO Companyprice n/a
  • BERI Consultingprice n/a
  • Best SEO Worldwideprice n/a
  • Better Web ManagementFrom $149/month
  • Big Splash Web Design & Marketingprice n/a
  • Bizangoprice n/a
  • BizIQ$100 - $149/hour
  • Blacksmith AgencyProjects from $50,000
  • Bliss DriveFrom $2,000/month
  • Blue Halo Agencyprice n/a
  • Blue Oak Marketingprice n/a
  • Blueprint Digitalprice n/a
  • Boosted Labprice n/a
  • Boral Agencyprice n/a
  • Boucher + Co.From $5,000/month
  • Brady Mills Agencyprice n/a
  • Brain Bytes Creativeprice n/a
  • Branding New York Cityprice n/a
  • BrandNationprice n/a
  • Brown Bag Marketingprice n/a
  • CadenceSEOFrom $1,500/month
  • CanestaFrom $1,500/month
  • Cardinal Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • CG MediaFrom $2,500/month
  • Charly Agencyprice n/a
  • Chatter Buzzprice n/a
  • Chicago SEO Consultantprice n/a
  • Chicago Tech SolutionsFrom $800/month
  • Chris Brown SEOFrom $499/month
  • Clarity Online SEOFrom $600/month
  • Click4Corpprice n/a
  • Clickmen™ Digital Marketing Agencyprice n/a
  • Code and Design GroupFrom $299/month
  • Colibri Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Colureprice n/a
  • CopifyFrom $599/month
  • CoreX Solutionsprice n/a
  • Cyrusson IncFrom $599/month
  • Dallas SEO AgencyFrom $750/month
  • Dallas SEO CompanyFrom $2,500/month
  • Dallas SEO Dogsprice n/a
  • DecographicFrom $2,500/month
  • Designs Legendprice n/a
  • DFW Website SEOprice n/a
  • Digital HonchosProjects from $5,000
  • Digital Marketers Chicagoprice n/a
  • Digital Media Ninjaprice n/a
  • Digital RadarProjects from $5,000
  • Digital Successprice n/a
  • Directory Oneprice n/a
  • DollySEOFrom $490/month
  • Double Up Digitalprice n/a
  • Drive Traffic MediaFrom $697/month
  • DUSK Digitalprice n/a
  • E-Platform Marketingprice n/a
  • E67 Agencyprice n/a
  • e9digitalprice n/a
  • Earn SEOFrom $200/month
  • eBizUniverseprice n/a
  • Eclipse Marketingprice n/a
  • Enterprise Digital Worldprice n/a
  • EWR DigitalProjects from $5,000
  • Excite Creative Studiosprice n/a
  • Exo Agencyprice n/a
  • Fanatically DigitalFrom $1,250/month
  • Fast Hippo Mediaprice n/a
  • FasturtleProjects from $1,000
  • FDG Webprice n/a
  • Find Local Companyprice n/a
  • fishbatFrom $3,000/month
  • Flamingo AgencyFrom $1,000/month
  • FlightpathFrom $4,500/month
  • Forward Pushprice n/a
  • Four.19 AgencyFrom $1,500/month
  • Fusionteczprice n/a
  • GBC Digital MarketingFrom $1,850/month
  • Geek in NYFrom $360/month
  • Get Visibleprice n/a
  • GR0From $7,000/month
  • Green Thumb Localprice n/a
  • Growth Saloonprice n/a
  • Growthopediaprice n/a
  • GrowwwiseFrom $349/month
  • Hawke MediaFrom $7,000/month
  • Hennessey DigitalFrom $5,000/month
  • Hey Day MarketingFrom $3,500/month
  • High Top Digitalprice n/a
  • Houston Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Hozioprice n/a
  • HVSEOprice n/a
  • Ice Nine Onlineprice n/a
  • IcepopFrom $5,500/month
  • ICONIERprice n/a
  • Idea Marketing GroupFrom $4,500/month
  • IgilityFrom $2,500/month
  • Illumination MarketingFrom $2,500/month
  • INFINI Marketingprice n/a
  • Insignia SEOProjects from $1,000
  • IntensifyFrom $3,500/month
  • Interactive Theoryprice n/a
  • Internet Marketing Phoenixprice n/a
  • Intrigue IT Solutionsprice n/a
  • iORSOFrom $1,500/month
  • ioVistaprice n/a
  • Ironclad Dynamics LLCprice n/a
  • ITVibesProjects from $10,000
  • Iwiin Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Iwiin Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Jessica Stegner SEOProjects from $750
  • JH SEO AgencyFrom $2,500/month
  • JOS (Joseph Studios)price n/a
  • JSL Marketing & Web Designprice n/a
  • Juggernaut Digitalprice n/a
  • K Business Solutions Inc.price n/a
  • Keever SEOFrom $1,000/month
  • KiLLit OnLineprice n/a
  • Kinetik Agencyprice n/a
  • KO Websitesprice n/a
  • Kyle Eggleston SEO Consultantprice n/a
  • LAD SolutionsFrom $2,500/month
  • LawFirmSEOPro.comprice n/a
  • LawRankFrom $4,000/month
  • Lead Gear Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Leadige Media Groupprice n/a
  • LeadOriginProjects from $5,000
  • Level343price n/a
  • Leverableprice n/a
  • LikeSocialBizFrom $150/month
  • Link Helpersprice n/a
  • Lizardo AgencyFrom $499/month
  • Local SEO Todayprice n/a
  • Logic Inboundprice n/a
  • Los Angeles SEO IncFrom $3,000/month
  • Lounge LizardFrom $5,000/month
  • Lucius Kingprice n/a
  • MA Teamprice n/a
  • Main Street ROIFrom $2,500/month
  • Mantas AukFrom $500/month
  • marketFXProjects from $5,000
  • Marketing 1on1price n/a
  • Marketing Eye AtlantaFrom $3,500/month
  • Marketing MavenFrom $3,000/month
  • Marqade INCprice n/a
  • Maverick Digital LLCprice n/a
  • MeanPugFrom $5,000/month
  • Media Express LLCprice n/a
  • Melleka MarketingFrom $750/month
  • MerkleFrom $25,000/month
  • Miami SEMFrom $750/month
  • Miami SEO Companyprice n/a
  • Milyon DigitalFrom $2,500/month
  • Mindful ConversionFrom $750/month
  • Mission Morphprice n/a
  • Mockingbird Marketingprice n/a
  • Mode EffectProjects from $1,000
  • Modern Practiceprice n/a
  • MuteSixFrom $5,000/month
  • N2SEOprice n/a
  • Nebo Agencyprice n/a
  • NetrocketFrom $500/month
  • New York SEOprice n/a
  • Newman Web SolutionsFrom $600/month
  • NIXAR Solutionsprice n/a
  • NYC SEO Proprice n/a
  • Odd Dog MediaFrom $1,000/month
  • Omojetprice n/a
  • On The Map MarketingFrom $3,000/month
  • One Digital Advertisingprice n/a
  • Onmove Digital Agencyprice n/a
  • Operation Technologyprice n/a
  • OptFirst Internet MarketingFrom $2,500/month
  • Orbit Digital StudioFrom $450/month
  • OuterBoxFrom $1,000/month
  • Pacific 54price n/a
  • Page One PowerFrom $4,000/month
  • PantelopeFrom $25,000/month
  • PEER365From $1,000/month
  • Perron Marketing Groupprice n/a
  • Persist MarketingFrom $2,000/month
  • Phoenix AI SEOFrom $1,500/month
  • Phoenix AZ Ad AgencyProjects from $1,000
  • Phoenix Online Mediaprice n/a
  • Phoenix SEO Geekprice n/a
  • Pillar Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Pilot Digital MarketingProjects from $4,250
  • PinnedFrom $500/month
  • Portside Marketingprice n/a
  • Precision Creativeprice n/a
  • Primary Positionprice n/a
  • PrimeViewprice n/a
  • Proleadsoftprice n/a
  • Puget Sound Marketing Solutionsprice n/a
  • PX MediaProjects from $1,000
  • Radically Distinctprice n/a
  • Readofiaprice n/a
  • Red BanyanFrom $7,500/month
  • Red Houston SEO CompanyProjects from $1,000
  • Redline Marketing & Dezignprice n/a
  • RedShark SEOFrom $450/month
  • Regex SEOProjects from $5,000
  • Relevance Advisorsprice n/a
  • ReThinc Advertising & PRprice n/a
  • Retna Mediaprice n/a
  • Rise InteractiveFrom $15,000/month
  • RiseOppprice n/a
  • Rocket SEO MiamiFrom $1,800/month
  • Ronkot Designprice n/a
  • Rook Digitalprice n/a
  • Rory Martinprice n/a
  • RSA Creative StudioProjects from $5,000
  • RuckusFrom $7,000/month
  • Search ControlFrom $500/month
  • Search Minersprice n/a
  • Seattle Digital Flowprice n/a
  • Seattle New Mediaprice n/a
  • Seattle Organic SEOFrom $449/month
  • Seattle PPC Agencyprice n/a
  • Seattle SEOprice n/a
  • SEM.NYCFrom $3,000/month
  • Seo Company Los Angelesprice n/a
  • SEO COMPANY MIAFrom $2,000/month
  • SEO Design ChicagoFrom $1,000/month
  • SEO Fuel MarketingFrom $1,200/month
  • SEO Guru Atlantaprice n/a
  • SEO Guru Houstonprice n/a
  • SEO Guru NYCprice n/a
  • SEO Houstonprice n/a
  • SEO ImageFrom $1,500/month
  • SEO Impact ProsFrom $1,000/month
  • SEO LAFrom $1,000/month
  • SEO Los Angeles 24price n/a
  • SEO Marketing LAFrom $2,500/month
  • SEO MiamiFrom $2,000/month
  • SEO Miamiprice n/a
  • SEO Optimizersprice n/a
  • SEO Phoenixprice n/a
  • SEO PRO Marvelprice n/a
  • SEO Services New Yorkprice n/a
  • SEO SociallyFrom $597/month
  • SEO-Exchangeprice n/a
  • SEOBERGFrom $200/month
  • SEOflyprice n/a
  • SEOLEVELUPFrom $695/month
  • Seota Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Siege MediaFrom $6,000/month
  • Signa MarketingProjects from $5,000
  • Simple SEO Groupprice n/a
  • Simply Digital Marketing Groupprice n/a
  • SiteRyze Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Sitrick And CompanyFrom $10,000/month
  • Sky SEO Digitalprice n/a
  • Slim Martyprice n/a
  • SmartSitesFrom $750/month
  • Social LinusFrom $997/month
  • Soderman SEOProjects from $1,000
  • Sosemoprice n/a
  • SPINX DigitalFrom $9,000/month
  • Splinternet MarketingFrom $242/month
  • Stable Solutions Digital MarketingFrom $2,000/month
  • StackmatixFrom $3,000/month
  • Star Tech SEOFrom $400/month
  • Staylistedprice n/a
  • Stellar SEOFrom $3,500/month
  • StudioHawkprice n/a
  • SugarFree DesignsProjects from $5,000
  • Sunlight MediaFrom $49/month
  • Superpathprice n/a
  • Surge Marketingprice n/a
  • Swarm Digitalprice n/a
  • Symphony AdvertisingFrom $1,250/month
  • Taktical DigitalFrom $5,000/month
  • Techwoodprice n/a
  • The Chicago Marketing AgencyFrom $1,500/month
  • The Design Boutiqueprice n/a
  • The Los Angeles SEO CompanyFrom $2,800/month
  • The Miami SEO CompanyFrom $3,000/month
  • The Uptown Agencyprice n/a
  • TheeHouston.Agencyprice n/a
  • Thomas Digital Web DesignFrom $500/month
  • ThriveFrom $2,500/month
  • Thrive Internet Marketing AgencyFrom $1,000/month
  • Thrive SEO NYCFrom $497/month
  • Tobie GroupProjects from $1,000
  • Top BrosFrom $2,000/month
  • Top Local SEO Services LLCprice n/a
  • Top New York SEO Companyprice n/a
  • Top Notch DezignsFrom $2,500/month
  • TopSpot Internet MarketingProjects from $1,000
  • TridenceFrom $2,500/month
  • Triforce Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • True Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Trueba Mediaprice n/a
  • Trustex BrandingFrom $439/month
  • TurnKey Website DesignFrom $1,400/month
  • TwinLeoFrom $399/month
  • UP Advertisingprice n/a
  • Urban InsightFrom $8,500/month
  • USA SEO Consultantprice n/a
  • V Digital Servicesprice n/a
  • VAB Media Digital Agencyprice n/a
  • Van West MediaFrom $3,000/month
  • Venz Mediaprice n/a
  • Verbsz Marketingprice n/a
  • Versa CreativeProjects from $1,000
  • Verve Marketing Groupprice n/a
  • VICE SEOprice n/a
  • ViewRankingprice n/a
  • Vizion Interactiveprice n/a
  • Web Chimpyprice n/a
  • WebDesk Solutionprice n/a
  • WebFXFrom $1,000/month
  • WEBRISFrom $5,000/month
  • Website DepotFrom $995/month
  • Widely InteractiveFrom $1,500/month
  • WiidemanFrom $5,000/month
  • Windy City DigitalFrom $1,500/month
  • Wise Advertisementprice n/a
  • WpromoteFrom $7,000/month
  • X Miami SEO Companyprice n/a
  • YellowFin Digitalprice n/a
  • Youtechprice n/a
  • Zen Den Web Designprice n/a

Only Vendar profile tags name B2B SaaS SEO; no outside source on file yet. (6)

  • iPullRankFrom $7,000/month
  • Loud InteractiveFrom $4,500/month
  • OneIMSFrom $5,000/month
  • Straight NorthFrom $5,000/month
  • uSERPFrom $10,000/month
  • Veza DigitalProjects from $25,000

Sources on file say the vendor offers B2B SaaS SEO; no case study or client review documents the work yet. (1)

  • LinkGraphFrom $5,000/month
Frequently asked questions (7)
How many Seattle SEO agencies have documented B2B SaaS SEO work?
1 of the 22 SEO agencies Vendar tracks in Seattle has at least one B2B SaaS SEO claim on file under the published rubric, and 86 more from other cities join the ranking with documented B2B SaaS SEO work; 4 of the 87 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 4 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 21 Seattle agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which of them have worked for clients in Seattle?
1 of the 87 ranked agencies have documented B2B SaaS SEO work for a client in Seattle: SEA Marketing (#59, Kirkland). The others are ranked on work for clients elsewhere.
Which Seattle B2B SaaS SEO agency fits my type of business?
By the clients named in their documented B2B SaaS SEO work: Law firms: 1GS Digital Agency (#53), KAFURE Consulting Services (#69), DiscoverMyBusiness (#75) and Chicago Style Media (#84); Dental, medical and wellness: Orbit Media (#6), Solid Digital (#14), Raging Agency (#45) and Just Digital Inc. (#67); Multi-location businesses: Social Cali (#56); Home and trade services: Comrade Digital Marketing (#5), Eversite (#30), Chicago Website Design SEO Company (CWDSC) (#36) and Ascendly Marketing (#40); Shops, restaurants and retail: Cegrix Ad Agency (#63). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does B2B SaaS SEO cost in Seattle?
Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $199/month and the median floor is $2,600/month. 49 of 87 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?
37 of 87 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified. The lowest disclosed floor among verified agencies is Netrocket at $500/month.
How is this list different from the Seattle SEO page?
The Seattle SEO page ranks every SEO agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with B2B SaaS SEO evidence on file, scores them on the B2B SaaS SEO query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
The newest profile verification among ranked agencies is September 27, 2026; the newest evidence claim was checked on November 3, 2026. Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
Get my shortlistMachine-readable versionAll details ↓
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓Close ↑
D1Full ranking table87 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1AlchemyLeads642513.3106.67.53.70-2n/a4/1Sep 27, 2026
2Directive5920.116.22.37.2100.52.50.86/0Sep 13, 2026
3HawkSEM5915.516.24.37.2104.11.30.83/0Apr 27, 2026
4Marcel Digital5819.516.20.87.2103.800.84/0Jun 2, 2026
5Comrade Digital Marketing561714.81.37.2104.71.30.813/0Sep 13, 2026
6Orbit Media5616.916.20.77.2104.11.30.88/0Not verified
7Striventa5615.49.7157.27.53.40-20.85/0Not verified
8Coalition Technologies561216.21.59.47.54.750.82/0Sep 13, 2026
9Visible Factors541813.3107.27.500-20.89/0Sep 27, 2026
10VisualFizz5415.816.20.86.6104.100.84/0Jun 2, 2026
11Brenton Way5315.513.38.66.67.53.50-20.83/0Sep 27, 2026
12DMD Digital SEO Marketing Agency5215.912.813.34.87.500-20.88/0Not verified
13IMPRiNT511816.21.53102.200.810/0Not verified
14Solid Digital511416.20.67.2102.900.83/0Sep 14, 2026
15Loona Agency501716.20.83102.600.89/0Sep 13, 2026
16Walker Sands501316.20.47.21021.30.82/0Jun 2, 2026
17Single Grain501016.22.97.2102.11.30.81/1Sep 13, 2026
18Sure Oak491416.21.53103.800.83/0Sep 14, 2026
19SEO Noble491214.82.47.2102.100.82/0Sep 12, 2026
20White Shark Media491214.80.27.2104.300.82/0Sep 13, 2026
21Dabaran491016.20.77.2103.81.30.81/1Sep 13, 2026
22B2BSEO.io4817.113.39.34.87.51.20-50.85/0Sep 27, 2026
23Storm Brain481212.80.37.27.54.43.80.82/0Jun 2, 2026
24GO-SEO4810.516.27.37.21000-30.83/0Sep 12, 2026
25Mimvi SEO48914.81.97.2104.900.82/0Sep 13, 2026
26Ripe Media4713.512.81.57.2102.100.83/0Not verified
27SeedX4713.516.21.43103.300.83/0Not verified
28Digital Authority Partners471216.20.27.21001.30.82/0Sep 13, 2026
29Power Digital47816.21.67.2101.42.50.81/0Jun 2, 2026
30Eversite4615.512.8153500-50.85/0Not verified
31Karpi Studio451413.31.231003.80.83/0Jul 1, 2026
32Sixth City Marketing4415.410.39.37.203.90-20.85/0Not verified
33Kobe Digital441112.80.57.27.53.71.30.82/0Jun 2, 2026
34Digital Silk44916.21.43102.91.30.81/0Jun 2, 2026
35Perfect Search Media44816.20.27.2100.81.30.81/0Jun 2, 2026
36Chicago Website Design SEO Company (CWDSC)431212.88.27.2500-20.82/0Not verified
37BRD Media43812.88.57.2530-20.81/0Not verified
38NoGood43816.20.63102.42.50.81/0Sep 14, 2026
39Exalt Growth411810.3153000-50.89/0Not verified
40Ascendly Marketing41812.887.2550-50.81/0Not verified
41Big Drop41612.80.57.2104.100.81/0Jun 2, 2026
42Search Engine Projects41616.23.83102.100.81/0Apr 27, 2026
43Digital Drew SEM40616.20.57.210000.81/0Jun 2, 2026
44Organic Marketing Pros391710.311.132.500-50.85/0Not verified
45Raging Agency39146.810.54.2050-20.83/0Not verified
46Netrocket391014.80.93100.700.81/1Sep 13, 2026
47LAv139814.80.57.253.500.81/0Sep 12, 2026
48Wise Roots Marketing Agency39812.88.34.27.52.90-50.81/0Not verified
49Optimum739614.80.17.21001.30.81/0Sep 13, 2026
50Jives Media38126.897.2050-20.82/0Not verified
51Avenue Z38816.20.6310000.81/0Sep 14, 2026
52Unified Marketing36126.88.57.203.10-20.82/0Not verified
531GS Digital Agency36816.29.13500-50.81/0Not verified
54Webinopoly3686.88.57.22.54.90-20.81/0Not verified
55OpenMoves36616.20.5310000.81/0Jun 2, 2026
56Social Cali351310.313.83000-50.82/0Not verified
57Razor Rank34156.810.17.2000-50.84/0Not verified
58SEO Busters3414.86.89.5301.70-20.84/0Not verified
59SEA Marketing34815.510.64.8000-50.81/0Not verified
60BusySeed34610.387.204.50-20.81/0Not verified
61Proceed Innovative34610.37.97.204.80-20.81/0Not verified
62405 Ads33814.81.637.501.3-30.81/0Sep 27, 2026
63Cegrix Ad Agency3215.86.811.73000-50.84/0Not verified
64Los Angeles SEO Group3296.89.17.201.90-20.81/0Not verified
65Canopy Media32610.38.17.202.30-20.81/0Not verified
66RedBrick Web Solutions3115.16.810.73000-50.85/0Not verified
67Just Digital Inc.3196.88.87.204.60-50.82/0Not verified
68HQDM3166.88.25.42.54.40-20.81/0Not verified
69KAFURE Consulting Services301210.39.53000-50.82/0Not verified
70LocalFi: SEO Digital Marketing Agency2986.88.1304.80-20.81/0Not verified
71Nvent Marketing29610.38.8302.80-20.81/0Not verified
72Jordan Digital Marketing2813.56.89.23000-50.82/0Not verified
73Rise Local2796.89.17.2000-50.81/0Not verified
74Brafton27810.383000-20.81/0Not verified
75DiscoverMyBusiness2786.88.66000-20.81/0Not verified
76Inbound SEO & Google Ads Agency27610.38.47.2000-50.81/0Not verified
77Atomic Design & Consulting26910.38.73000-50.81/0Not verified
78EraBright Digital Marketing2686.89.17.2000-50.81/0Not verified
79Red Clay Commerce26810.39.63000-50.81/0Not verified
80Marketasa2666.89.1302.80-20.81/0Not verified
81Nexus Marketing25810.39.13000-50.81/0Not verified
82Webbify Studio2586.88.1301.20-20.81/0Not verified
83Connect Media Agency2486.88.56000-50.81/0Not verified
84Chicago Style Media2386.89.83000-50.81/0Not verified
85Autheysoft2286.89.63000-50.81/0Not verified
86Dharma Digital Marketing Agency2286.89.23000-50.81/0Not verified
87Magnified Media2186.88.53000-50.81/0Not verified

Pool 22 · ranked 87 · unranked 365 (6 with profile tags only) · verified 37 · pricing disclosed 49 · case studies on file 380 · an outside source names the work 4 · an outside document describes it 4 · lowest verified floor Netrocket $500/month

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 AlchemyLeads64/100 · Confidence not rated yet

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · Projects from $5,000 · hourly $150-$199 · projects from $5,000 · 30 claims on file

Evidence for this query25/300.8334 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 1 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; Sean Chaudhary is a link building specialist whose niche is B2B SEO. (statsdrone.com, verified); AlchemyLeads worked with an industrial cleanroom manufacturer whose monthly sales pipeline grew from $1M to $2.7M in 90 days, a 170%… (alchemyleads.com, claimed)
Fit to this query13.3/250.53Serves Seattle from Calabasas, CA, USA; no local office on file; Projects from $5,000; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth10/150.6671 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 4 of 30 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability6.6/100.66In business since 2017; Retention not documented
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed (Projects from $5,000); Team size 10-49; Process not documented
Reputation3.7/50.74134 third-party reviews at 4.8
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Sean Chaudhary is a link building specialist whose niche is B2B SEO.

    Independent source · statsdrone.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1 · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • AlchemyLeads worked with an industrial cleanroom manufacturer whose monthly sales pipeline grew from $1M to $2.7M in 90 days, a 170% increase.

    Agency's own words · alchemyleads.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The integrated approach helped an industrial cleanroom manufacturer grow its monthly sales pipeline from $1M to $2.7M in 90 days.

    Agency's own words · alchemyleads.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • AlchemyLeads reports a B2B SEO and content case study for a Shopify 3PL with 4x organic traffic growth (40,000 to 180,000 monthly visits in 12 months), 8,000+ keywords on page 1, and 3x revenue increase year over year.

    Agency's own words · alchemyleads.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 20 reviews; Trustpilot 4.5 from 14 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#2 Directive59/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $6,000/month · hourly $150 - $199 · 66 claims on file

Evidence for this query20.1/300.67099999999999996 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Directive worked with Arctic Wolf on a conversion architecture restructuring and budget realignment in the B2B technology sector… (directiveconsulting.com, claimed); Directive's B2B SEO page covers technical SEO audits, content strategy, keyword/on-page optimization, link building, analytics, and… (directiveconsulting.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Irvine, CA, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $6,000/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth2.3/150.1521 of 13 listed services are SEO services; 6 of 66 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2013; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $6,000/month); Team size 130+; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation0.5/50.0961 third-party review at 3.2
Market credibility2.5/50.52 recognitions with a source on file: a certification per vegaawards.com, a press mention per marketingprofs.com; Sources: vegaawards.com, checked Nov 2026; marketingprofs.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

  • Directive worked with Arctic Wolf on a conversion architecture restructuring and budget realignment in the B2B technology sector, reporting a 59% pipeline increase, a 300% boost in ROI, and a 109% increase in closed/won revenue quarter over quarter. The result is not attributable to one service, as it involved conversion architecture and budget alignment across demand generation channels.

    Agency's own words · directiveconsulting.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Directive's B2B SEO page covers technical SEO audits, content strategy, keyword/on-page optimization, link building, analytics, and pipeline/ROI reporting.

    Agency's own words · directiveconsulting.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Directive worked with Pelican to restructure its campaigns around buyer behavior, shifting budget toward high-intent platforms, segmenting use cases, and building dedicated landing experiences, resulting in a 170% increase in conversion rates and more qualified leads.

    Agency's own words · directiveconsulting.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Directive's B2B SEO page cites Inscribe's SEO transformation with keyword growth, domain authority lift, and organic traffic gains.

    Agency's own words · directiveconsulting.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For Pelican, Directive restructured campaigns around real buyer behavior, shifting budget toward high-intent platforms, segmenting use cases, and building dedicated landing experiences, which led to stronger visibility, more qualified leads, and significantly improved conversion performance.

    Agency's own words · directiveconsulting.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Editorial use case: B2B SaaS, technology, cybersecurity, and enterprise marketing teams that need SEO tied to pipeline..

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.4 · checked Sep 13, 2026

Reviews: Trustpilot 3.2 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): B2B / SaaS, Technical SEO, Enterprise SEO

#3 HawkSEM59/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $1,515/month · 100 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.5/300.5173 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Datadog, a B2B SaaS company, increased sales demos by 75% while drastically cutting CPA through paid search, remarketing, and SEO. The… (hawksem.com, claimed); Zephyr, a B2B SaaS company, increased lead volume by 100% while slashing CPA by $250 through SEO. (hawksem.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $1,515/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth4.3/150.28714 of 28 listed services are SEO services; 3 of 100 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2006; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $1,515/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.1/50.824000000000000147 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: Meta Business Partner; Sources: velocityppc.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified April 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Datadog, a B2B SaaS company, increased sales demos by 75% while drastically cutting CPA through paid search, remarketing, and SEO. The result spans multiple channels and is not attributable to one service.

    Agency's own words · hawksem.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Zephyr, a B2B SaaS company, increased lead volume by 100% while slashing CPA by $250 through SEO.

    Agency's own words · hawksem.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • HawkSEM's own case study for DesktopReady, a desktop-as-a-service (DaaS) software company with "over 1 million users", says a new website launch caused a traffic slump; HawkSEM "conducted a full audit to catch all issues affecting the site's appeal to SERPs", optimised old content and "created new content to target more qualified leads". Reported: users up 409%, backlinks from 822 to 1,340, and ranking terms from 4 to 468.

    Agency's own words · hawksem.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.9 from 46 reviews; Trustpilot 3.2 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): B2B / SaaS, Content-led SEO, Ecommerce SEO

#4 Marcel Digital58/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $6,000/month · hourly $150 - $199 · projects from $6,000 · 303 claims on file

Evidence for this query19.5/300.654 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Marcel Digital's own B2B SaaS SEO case study for Medius, a spend management and AP automation software company, describes aligning SEO… (marceldigital.com, claimed); For a B2B SaaS company, Marcel Digital's search engine optimization work was associated with a 21% increase in organic traffic from target… (marceldigital.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $6,000/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth0.8/150.054000000000000018 of 108 listed services are SEO services; 4 of 303 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2003; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $6,000/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation3.8/50.76842 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Marcel Digital's own B2B SaaS SEO case study for Medius, a spend management and AP automation software company, describes aligning SEO with its ideal customer profile so leads progress to MQLs, and reports search-driven leads +61% year over year and organic traffic from targeted markets +21.4%. The page does not say the leads came from organic search alone.

    Agency's own words · marceldigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For a B2B SaaS company, Marcel Digital's search engine optimization work was associated with a 21% increase in organic traffic from target markets and a 61% increase in search-driven leads.

    Agency's own words · marceldigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • For Medius, Marcel Digital launched localized content and regional sites in priority international markets, especially France, supported by link-building, and enhanced lead attribution within the marketing automation platform to better measure ICP-aligned MQLs. Eight of the top 10 trafficked blogs in 2024 were created or refreshed as part of the SEO campaign, contributing 24% of all key blog-related events despite being 1.6% of total content.

    Agency's own words · marceldigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Editorial use case: Complex programs where lead quality, pipeline value, and reporting discipline matter as much as volume..

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.4 · checked Jun 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.7 from 42 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): B2B Demand Gen, Conversion Rate Optimization, Landing Page Optimization, Attribution / Analytics

#5 Comrade Digital Marketing56/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $1,450/month · hourly $100 - $149 / hr · projects from $10,000 · 250 claims on file

Evidence for this query17/300.567000000000000113 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 13 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Comrade reports a 221% increase in total inquiries for a Chicago cabinet contractor, Granite Selection, along with 68% lower cost per lead… (comradeweb.com, claimed); Comrade reports a peak marketing ROI of 3,089%, a 514% increase in qualified leads, and a 73% decrease in cost per lead for Streamline… (comradeweb.com, claimed)
Fit to this query14.8/250.59Serves Seattle from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $1,450/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Best-fit note mentions Local Service Ads
Capability depth1.3/150.0854 of 101 listed services are SEO services; 13 of 250 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2008; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $1,450/month); Team size 100+; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.7/50.94116 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: an award per we-awards.com; Sources: we-awards.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

  • Comrade reports a 221% increase in total inquiries for a Chicago cabinet contractor, Granite Selection, along with 68% lower cost per lead and 1,489% organic traffic growth. The client's testimonial credits SEO for a move from sporadic calls to a consistent monthly pipeline.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Comrade reports a peak marketing ROI of 3,089%, a 514% increase in qualified leads, and a 73% decrease in cost per lead for Streamline Design & Permitting in under 12 months.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Comrade reports a 320% increase in qualified leads, a 2,718% increase in conversion rate, and a 5,900% increase in organic traffic for Forbel Custom Security Solutions in its first 9 months.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Over 24 months post-launch, Absolute Home Services' marketing ROI reached 10,565% (Apr-Jun 2025 average, per Comrade's Growth Portal), and qualified leads increased 303% versus Apr-Jun 2023.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Comrade rebuilt Absolute Home Services' website and reports 10,565% marketing ROI, +303% qualified leads, and +595% organic traffic.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Comrade reports a 10,565% marketing ROI, a 303% increase in qualified leads, and a 595% increase in organic traffic for Absolute Home Services.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Comrade reports a 1,373% marketing ROI and a 109% increase in qualified leads for Cedar Rustic Fence, attributed to SEO and site optimization.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For Cedar Rustic Fence, Comrade reported a 109% increase in qualified leads comparing Feb-Apr 2024 to Feb-Apr 2026, sourced from Comrade Growth Portal.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For Cedar Rustic Fence, Comrade reported that qualified leads more than doubled (up 109%) while the cost to acquire each lead dropped 41% over the 24-month window; the engagement combined SEO, content marketing, and targeted advertising, so the result is not attributable to one service.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Internal tracking showed qualified leads for Absolute Home Services grew roughly fourfold over 24 months and cost per qualified lead dropped by about 95%.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Comrade rebuilt Cedar Rustic's fence contractor website and reports 1,373% marketing ROI, +109% qualified leads, and +794% organic traffic.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Comrade rebuilt Forbel's commercial security systems website and reports +51% qualified leads, -34% cost per lead, and +478% organic traffic.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Twelve months after the website relaunch, Absolute Home Services' organic channel produced roughly six times the monthly qualified leads of the pre-launch period.

    Agency's own words · comradeweb.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.8 from 93 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 23 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Customer Acquisition, Conversion Rate Optimization, Landing Page Optimization, CAC Optimization

#6 Orbit Media56/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $4,500/month · hourly $150 - $199 · projects from $4,500 · 238 claims on file

Evidence for this query16.9/300.5658 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 8 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Orbit Media's own case study for Experity, a software company selling EMR software to urgent care clinics, reports a 91% year-over-year… (orbitmedia.com, claimed); Orbit Media delivered a website project for The Horton Group, a case study that reports a 26% increase in qualified leads from the website. (orbitmedia.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $4,500/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth0.7/150.051 of 63 listed services are SEO services; 8 of 238 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2001; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $4,500/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.1/50.82848 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: WE Awards; Sources: we-awards.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Orbit Media's own case study for Experity, a software company selling EMR software to urgent care clinics, reports a 91% year-over-year increase in demo requests and a 25-position gain in average ranking for priority keywords. Orbit also redesigned the site, so the demo request gain is not isolated to organic search.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Orbit Media delivered a website project for The Horton Group, a case study that reports a 26% increase in qualified leads from the website.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Orbit Media's own case study for Altium, a PCB design software company, covers SEO for the new Altium 365 cloud platform domain and reports organic conversions +40% and total ranking keywords +53% over three months.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Orbit Media delivered a website redesign for The Horton Group, and the firm achieved 26% growth in qualified leads coming in from the website.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Orbit's work for Experity produced a 26% increase in organic traffic value, a 25-position increase in average ranking for priority keywords, and a 91% year-over-year increase in demo requests, per data from the six months to August 2024. The results combine SEO, content and CRO work, so they are not attributable to one service.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • The page lists a case study result for Experity: a 91% increase in demo requests year over year.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A Senior Marketing Manager at client Exostar stated that Orbit Media's work turned organic search into a reliable driver of pipeline for the company.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Orbit worked on Experity’s site. Data from the last six months as of August 2024 showed organic traffic value increased by 26%, average ranking for priority keywords improved by 25 positions, and demo requests increased 91% year over year.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.9 from 48 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Content-led SEO, SEO for Conversion Growth, Traffic Growth SEO, SEO Agencies with Case Studies

#7 Striventa56/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · $150 - $199/hour · hourly $150 - $199 · 11 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.4/300.5135 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Striventa's case study names Family First Intervention, a nationwide addiction and mental health treatment interventionist company, as a… (striventa.com, claimed); A case study states Striventa helped scale a multi-location pain management leader in Arizona, with a 115% increase in qualified leads. (striventa.com, claimed)
Fit to this query9.7/250.39Serves Seattle from Glendale, AZ, USA; no local office on file; $150 - $199/hour; no monthly floor disclosed
Capability depth15/1511 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 5 of 11 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2013; Retention not documented
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed ($150 - $199/hour); Team size 2-9; Process not documented
Reputation3.4/50.670999999999999921 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Striventa's case study names Family First Intervention, a nationwide addiction and mental health treatment interventionist company, as a client it partnered with for over five years on digital marketing, a custom website, sales consulting, and pipeline management.

    Agency's own words · striventa.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A case study states Striventa helped scale a multi-location pain management leader in Arizona, with a 115% increase in qualified leads.

    Agency's own words · striventa.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For Family First Intervention, Striventa added over 200 pieces of new content throughout the website, which the page says drives qualified leads.

    Agency's own words · striventa.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Working alongside the owner of Family First Intervention, Striventa revitalized the client's sales pipeline using incoming qualified leads and re-engagement campaigns, delivering stronger performance in the first month than the company achieved in the prior six months.

    Agency's own words · striventa.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For client Family First Intervention, Striventa rebuilt the website on its Hyperdrive WordPress framework, added location pages and resources, and improved site architecture; the page reports this produced consistent highly qualified leads over more than five years. The results span website, content, and sales work and are not attributable to one service.

    Agency's own words · striventa.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 21 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#8 Coalition Technologies56/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $1,800/month · hourly $110/hour · projects from $1,000 · 313 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Coalition Technologies' case study for Microsoft's Bing Maps Platform, a B2B software company product for enterprise developers, describes… (coalitiontechnologies.com, claimed); Official Los Angeles SEO page says Coalition drives 25M+ monthly organic visitors, 500+ SEO case studies, 20M+ ecommerce transactions, and… (coalitiontechnologies.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $1,800/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth1.5/150.09915 of 82 listed services are SEO services; 2 of 313 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability9.4/100.9359999999999999In business since 2009; Client retention 84% (documented)
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed (From $1,800/month); Team size 250+; Process not documented
Reputation4.7/50.94281 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility5/516 recognitions with a source on file: Ordergroove partner, Klaviyo partner, a press mention per growave.io, an award per partners.ordergroove.com, an award per partners.dotdigital.com, a press mention per partners.teamworkcommerce.com; Sources: partners.ordergroove.com, checked Oct 2026; connect.klaviyo.com, checked Oct 2026; growave.io, checked Oct 2026; partners.dotdigital.com, checked Oct 2026; 1 more

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

  • Coalition Technologies' case study for Microsoft's Bing Maps Platform, a B2B software company product for enterprise developers, describes keyword research for "the most valuable terms searched by qualified leads" and site fixes; it reports 492 new ranking keywords, including "Map API", "Map License" and "Truck Routing Software" on Google's first page, and goal completions up 11.56% (35,208 leads) in eight months, with organic search contributing more than 27% of site traffic. The same engagement ran paid search, reported separately.

    Agency's own words · coalitiontechnologies.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • Official Los Angeles SEO page says Coalition drives 25M+ monthly organic visitors, 500+ SEO case studies, 20M+ ecommerce transactions, and 6M+ qualified leads.

    Agency's own words · coalitiontechnologies.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · checked Oct 31, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.8 from 254 reviews; Trustpilot 4.2 from 27 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Los Angeles SEO, Ecommerce SEO, Lead generation SEO, Los Angeles ecommerce development

#9 Visible Factors54/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · Projects from $5,000 · hourly $200-$300 · projects from $5,000 · 68 claims on file

Evidence for this query18/300.5999 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 9 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; A case study reports SaaS SEO work for Heymarket with a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ Top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY… (visiblefactors.com, claimed); Visible Factors ran SaaS SEO for Heymarket, with the case study citing a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ top 10 rankings, and… (visiblefactors.com, claimed)
Fit to this query13.3/250.53Serves Seattle from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Projects from $5,000; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth10/150.6651 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 9 of 68 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2014; Retention not documented
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed (Projects from $5,000); Team size 10-49; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • A case study reports SaaS SEO work for Heymarket with a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ Top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY traffic growth.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Visible Factors ran SaaS SEO for Heymarket, with the case study citing a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY traffic growth.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Visible Factors reports a Heymarket SaaS SEO case study with a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY traffic growth.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A B2B SaaS case study for MoPro reports performance marketing growth with 8,000 leads per month, a 381% increase in lead volume, and a 51% reduction in CPA.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Visible Factors ran SaaS SEO for Heymarket, with a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY traffic growth.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Heymarket achieved a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY traffic growth through SaaS SEO.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A case study for Heymarket describes SaaS SEO growth with a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ top 10 rankings, and 100%+ year-over-year traffic growth.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A case study for Heymarket reports a SaaS SEO engagement with a 14x increase in organic search traffic, 450+ top 10 rankings, and 100%+ YoY traffic growth.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A case study for MoPro reports a B2B SaaS performance marketing engagement with 8,000 leads per month, a 381% increase in lead volume, and a 51% reduction in CPA.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#10 VisualFizz54/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $5,000/month · hourly $150 - $199 · projects from $6,000 · 294 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.8/300.5254 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; VisualFizz's own B2B SaaS SEO case study for Wise Systems, a dispatch and routing software company, describes technical cleanup, redirect… (visualfizz.com, claimed); VisualFizz built and launched a new website for security consultancy TDI Vertical in 12 weeks with zero downtime, which the page says… (visualfizz.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $5,000/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth0.8/150.055999999999999997 of 90 listed services are SEO services; 4 of 294 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability6.6/100.66In business since 2017; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $5,000/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.1/50.827000000000000144 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • VisualFizz's own B2B SaaS SEO case study for Wise Systems, a dispatch and routing software company, describes technical cleanup, redirect mapping after a failed redesign and content pillars, and reports demo form completions +20.69% between July 2022 and May 2023 against the previous year, under the page's organic conversion heading.

    Agency's own words · visualfizz.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • VisualFizz built and launched a new website for security consultancy TDI Vertical in 12 weeks with zero downtime, which the page says protected SEO equity and pipeline momentum.

    Agency's own words · visualfizz.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For each new Rose Paving branch or merger, VisualFizz activated a 30-60-90-day launch strategy covering social announcements, landing pages, GA4 tracking, single-keyword ad groups, and onboarding emails, keeping the sales pipeline full during national expansion.

    Agency's own words · visualfizz.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For Brainfish, demo requests surged after VisualFizz resolved the client's tracking errors, and CPA dropped from $963.92 to $202.54 in 30 days.

    Agency's own words · visualfizz.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 44 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Growth Marketing, Full-funnel Growth, Creative Testing, Customer Acquisition

Positions 11 to 87: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.09

A claim counts as B2B SaaS evidence when a source on file names work for a software business: qualified pipeline, demo or trial signups from organic, product-led or bottom-of-funnel content, comparison and alternative pages, integration or use-case pages, or a named SaaS client with a result. Reviews naming pipeline or signups carry the most weight. A Vendar service listing or profile tag never earns a rank on its own.

Terms that count:
b2b saas, saas seo, b2b seo, demo request, demo requests, free trial, trial signups, pipeline, mqls, sqls, qualified leads, product-led, bottom of funnel, comparison page, alternatives page, integration pages, use case pages, software company
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names B2B SaaS SEO work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports B2B SaaS SEO under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
B2B SaaS SEO 2026.09
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/marketing/seo/seattle/b2b-saas

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring

Seattle buyer context

What B2B SaaS SEO has to do differently

The buyer is a committee and the journey ends in a demo or a trial, not a cart. Comparison, alternative and use-case pages carry that traffic, and the work has to survive the product changing under it.

Fit
  • Writes for evaluators, not for a general audience: comparisons, alternatives, use cases.
  • Connects organic sessions to pipeline in your CRM, not to a goal in analytics.
  • Can keep pages honest when the product or pricing changes.
Proof
  • Which page type produced demo requests, and how many?
  • How do you attribute a self-serve signup to organic?
  • What happens to the content plan when we reposition?
Budget
  • Ranked here and disclosing a monthly minimum: 43, from $199 to $20K.
  • Middle of that range: about $2.6K a month.
  • 44 of the 87 ranked agencies do not publish a minimum; ask on the first call.

Other Seattle SEO scenarios

All SEOLocal SEOSmall BusinessEcommerceEnterpriseTechnicalAI SearchContent-ledMultilingualAuditConsultingRetainerRecovery

B2B SaaS SEO in other cities

Los AngelesNew YorkChicagoMiami