Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #4 Technical SEO in Atlanta, of 10 · also in 18 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Nothing on file says who this agency suits: no client types, industries or reviews to read it from.
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 8 of 8 results with a number do not say what year they were measured.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a Technical SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #3 Newman Web Solutions41Ranks above on this question#3#4 this oneScore4137Independent00PriceFrom $600/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #5 Brady Mills Agency37Ranks below on this question#5#4 this oneScore3737Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Autheysoft.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#4 Technical SEO in Atlanta: 37/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 12 | 40% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 11.7 | 78% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed8 of 8 on file · 0 of 8 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 8 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 8. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Technical SEO 2 · Content-led SEO 2 · Local SEO 1 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 2 · B2B SaaS SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 8 is on the proof page.
Autheysoft's SEO strategy helped Luxe Facial grow organic traffic by 32% and lift conversions by 45% on a site scoring 98 on PageSpeed.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workTechnical SEOQuote from the source page
Autheysoft's SEO strategy helped Luxe Facial grow organic traffic by 32% and lift conversions by 45%, all on a site scoring 98 on PageSpeed.
Autheysoft's technical SEO and content strategy helped MarketCars AI lift website CTR by 42% and lead conversions by 58% on a 99 PageSpeed site.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workTechnical SEOContent-led SEOQuote from the source page
Autheysoft's technical SEO and content strategy helped MarketCars AI lift website CTR by 42% and lead conversions by 58% on a 99 PageSpeed site.
Autheysoft's local SEO and content strategy for Luxe Meridia resulted in 38% higher website CTR and 52% more tour requests from Atlanta luxury buyers.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workLocal SEOContent-led SEOSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
Autheysoft's local SEO and content strategy for Luxe Meridia resulted in 38% higher website CTR and 52% more tour requests from Atlanta luxury buyers.
Autheysoft lists web development and SEO optimization for Luxe Facials Treatments. The page reports a 128% increase in qualified leads, 3.2x longer site engagement, and a higher conversion rate from visitors to inquiries.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workB2B SaaS SEOSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Web Development and SEO Optimization Visual-first approach with intuitive filtering options, prominent property imagery, and straightforward navigation. Benefits 128% increase in qualified leads, 3.2x longer site engagement, and higher conversion rate from visitors to inquiries.
Autheysoft lists SEO writing and copywriting, login forms, UX design, and chatbot design for OnScale.com. The page reports a 65% reduction in appointment no-shows, a 92% patient satisfaction rate, and a 40% decrease in administrative tasks.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
SEO - Writing, Copyrighting Login Forms, UX Design, Chatbot Design User Interface and User Experience Design Benefits 65% reduction in appointment no-shows, 92% patient satisfaction rate, and 40% decrease in administrative tasks.
Autheysoft’s GEO-first content work for Luxe Meridia was described as making it a top AI-cited source for Atlanta luxury living, with tour requests growing by 52% and CTR by 38%.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
Autheysoft's GEO-first content made Luxe Meridia a top AI-cited source for Atlanta luxury living, growing tour requests by 52% and CTR by 38%.
Autheysoft’s GEO work for Luxe Facial was described as positioning the business as an AI-cited answer for advanced facial treatments, with 45% more conversions.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Autheysoft's GEO approach positioned Luxe Facial as Atlanta's top AI-cited answer for advanced facial treatments, driving 45% more conversions.
Autheysoft structured MarketCars AI's content for generative engines; the page reports a 42% increase in website CTR and a 58% increase in lead conversions.
Agency's own wordsautheysoft.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Autheysoft structured MarketCars AI's content for generative engines, increasing CTR by 42% and lead conversions by 58% as AI citations drove discovery.
Positions in every ranking19 rankings
19 positions: 19 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #4 of 10 | 37 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Atlantaon its own published cases | #10 of 11 | 37 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #67 of 87 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #67 of 87 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #68 of 88 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
14 more positionsHide the other 14
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content-led SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #70 of 87 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #91 of 115 | 29 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #48 of 87 | 39 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #68 of 87 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #92 of 115 | 29 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #93 of 116 | 29 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Atlantaon its own published cases | #13 of 16 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #14 of 15 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #70 of 87 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #87 of 88 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Atlanta, GA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Atlanta, GA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Luxe Facial, MarketCars AI, Luxe Meridia, Luxe Facials Treatments, OnScale.comIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Technical SEO $600 (1 of 10 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $1,300 (2 of 11 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $1,300 (2 of 16 disclose) · Local SEO $799 (4 of 15 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 88 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 88 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 8 cases with a named client and a result, 8 work claims28/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 8 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 8 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 8 of 820/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 8 of 815/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names technical SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 8 of 8 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 8 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.