Vendar
AI vendor intelligence
Vendar
AI vendor intelligence
Blog
Find Match
  • 570agency profiles
  • 232ranking pages
  • 86open to search
  • 9cities
  • Nov 5 03:03 UTCupdated
  • 2026.11.7model
The Vendar standard

Rankings built on documented work, not on who pays

Cases, reviews and sources form the record. Every position starts with evidence you can inspect.

  • Ranked on documented work
    01 / Evidence
  • No paid placements
    02 / Independence
  • Every fact has a date and a source
    03 / Traceability
  • Same data for people and AI
    04 / Access
Explore
SEOMobile DevelopmentFind MatchShortlistMap
Method
How we rankEditorial policyHow we make moneyBlogVendor checklist
For agencies
ParticipateCorrect your data
For AI
Machine-readable datallms.txt
© 2026 Vendar.org
AboutPrivacyContact
MarketingSEOSeattleSEO Audit
Seattle / SEO Audit

SEO Audit Agencies Serving Seattle (2026)

39 agencies are ranked on documented SEO audit work: 0 based in or serving Seattle and 39 from other cities, marked as such; 4 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 39 SEO agencies for SEO audit in Seattle, 0 of them local: the ones with documented SEO audit work on file, verified through September 2026. The top three by evidence-weighted score are Coalition Technologies (75/100), HawkSEM (59) and Walker Sands (57). No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 22 Seattle SEO agencies have no SEO audit claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1Coalition Technologies 75 · From $1,800/month · clients 4.7/5 (281)7 SEO audit claims on file: 2 third-party, 4 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 3 distinct sites
  2. 2HawkSEM 59 · From $1,515/month · clients 4.9/5 (47)3 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  3. 3Walker Sands 57 · From $10,000/month · clients 4.8/5 (6)2 SEO audit claims on file: 1 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites

Budget in Seattle: disclosed monthly floors run from $200 to $10,000, median $3,000; 25 of 39 disclose a price.

39 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
ForPays
1
Coalition Technologies logo

Coalition Technologies

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 250+ · since 2009

national coverage · From $1,800/month · clients 4.7/5 (281) 2 documented

C. A. reviewed Coalition Technologies, stating that Coalition Technologies performed a website audit for their women's retail store to identify areas of… (Independent source, verified-reviews.com)

75/100
High confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
2
HawkSEM logo

HawkSEM

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 10-49 · since 2006

national coverage · From $1,515/month · clients 4.9/5 (47) Agency's own published cases

HawkSEM documented an SEO recovery for DesktopReady after a new website launch caused a traffic slump, with a technical SEO audit, content work, and… (Agency's own words, hawksem.com)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

59/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Apr 2026
View profile
3
Walker Sands logo

Walker Sands

Chicago, IL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2001

national coverage · From $10,000/month · clients 4.8/5 (6) 1 documented

Sitebulb's customer case study describes a technical audit by Walker Sands for a large B2B predictive-analytics client whose site had fallen to "9 URLs in… (Independent source, sitebulb.com)

Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

57/100
High confidence
Verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
4
Orbit Media logo

Orbit Media

Chicago, IL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2001

national coverage · From $4,500/month · clients 4.9/5 (48) Agency's own published cases

Orbit Media worked with Sonatype, which helps enterprises improve their software supply chain, on site audits and remediation (indexing, images, backlinks… (Agency's own words, orbitmedia.com)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

55/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
5
SEO Image logo

SEO Image

New York, NY, USA · team 10-49 · since 2002

national coverage · From $1,500/month · clients 4.9/5 (14) Agency's own published cases

SEO Image's own case study for Related Rentals, a real-estate rental site built largely in Flash, describes a 55-page enterprise SEO audit that "reviewed… (Agency's own words, seoimage.com)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

54/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
6A

AdsRole

Houston, TX, USA · team 501-1000 · since 2017

national coverage · From $399/month · clients 4.0/5 (189) Agency's own published cases

For the Fossil client, AdsRole performed a complete technical SEO audit, improved crawlability and indexing, optimized site architecture, and enhanced… (Agency's own words, adsrole.com)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

54/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
7
iPullRank logo

iPullRank

New York, NY, USA · team 10-49

national coverage · From $7,000/month Agency's own published cases

iPullRank documents SEO work for one of the world’s largest banks in the mortgage lending industry, including an SEO site audit, technical fixes, and a… (Agency's own words, ipullrank.com)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

50/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified · Sources checked Apr 2026
View profile
8
Marcel Digital logo

Marcel Digital

Chicago, IL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2003

national coverage · From $6,000/month · clients 4.7/5 (42) Agency's own published cases

Arbour Group: …provider for the life sciences, describes a comprehensive SEO audit of the organization's search performance and "a full backlink audit to remove toxic… (Agency's own words, marceldigital.com)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

50/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
9
Visible Factors logo

Visible Factors

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 10-49 · since 2014

national coverage · Projects from $5,000 Agency's own published cases

Visible Factors provided Ticketmaster with SEO strategy and technical SEO audits, and organic search traffic increased 17% in users and 34% in page views… (Agency's own words, visiblefactors.com)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

49/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
10
Icepop logo

Icepop

Los Angeles, CA, USA · team 10-49

national coverage · From $5,500/month · clients 5.0/5 (45) Agency's own published cases

NuWatt Lighting: …"with a full SEO audit" and restructured paid media, content and email over several years. It reports organic revenue up 199%; the headline rise in… (Agency's own words, icepop.co)

No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

49/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Jun 2026
View profile
413 more agencies considered without externally confirmed SEO audit work, 22 of them serving Seattle

This is an absence of evidence, not a quality rating.

One sourced claim moves an agency into the ranking.

No SEO audit claim on file yet. (403)

  • 10Tier.comprice n/a
  • 1GS Digital AgencyFrom $799/month
  • 1MDEprice n/a
  • 222 Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • 405 AdsFrom $2,500/month
  • 97 Switchprice n/a
  • 9th Street Mediaprice n/a
  • Acadiaprice n/a
  • Accelerate Phoenix SEOprice n/a
  • Actuate Mediaprice n/a
  • AdceteraProjects from $25,000
  • Add3price n/a
  • AditProjects from $10,000
  • AdvertasProjects from $5,000
  • Affordable Imageprice n/a
  • AlchemyLeadsProjects from $5,000
  • AlgoWithYouprice n/a
  • All Day Web Design & Hostingprice n/a
  • Allevi8 Marketingprice n/a
  • AMM Firmprice n/a
  • AmsiveFrom $8,000/month
  • Anderson Collaborativeprice n/a
  • Anthony's Agencyprice n/a
  • Apex Digital Media$100-$149/hour
  • Appture Digital MediaProjects from $7,500
  • Ardorc Consulting & Marketing Servicesprice n/a
  • Area Code Agencyprice n/a
  • Ascendly MarketingFrom $799/month
  • ASTOUNDZFrom $1,495/month
  • Atlanta Ecommerce Agencyprice n/a
  • Atomic Design & Consultingprice n/a
  • Atomic Socialprice n/a
  • AumcoreFrom $6,000/month
  • Autheysoftprice n/a
  • Avenue 25Projects from $1,000
  • Avenue ZFrom $7,000/month
  • AvexFrom $6,000/month
  • Avidon Marketing GroupFrom $3,000/month
  • AVINTIVProjects from $5,000
  • B2B AlliesFrom $699/month
  • Bayarea SEO Firmprice n/a
  • Bear SEOFrom $1,250/month
  • Bellevue SEO Companyprice n/a
  • BERI Consultingprice n/a
  • Best SEO Worldwideprice n/a
  • Better Web ManagementFrom $149/month
  • Big DropFrom $5,000/month
  • Big Splash Web Design & Marketingprice n/a
  • Bizangoprice n/a
  • Blacksmith AgencyProjects from $50,000
  • Blue Halo Agencyprice n/a
  • Blue Oak Marketingprice n/a
  • Blueprint Digitalprice n/a
  • Boosted Labprice n/a
  • Boral Agencyprice n/a
  • Boucher + Co.From $5,000/month
  • Brady Mills Agencyprice n/a
  • Braftonprice n/a
  • Brain Bytes Creativeprice n/a
  • Branding New York Cityprice n/a
  • BrandNationprice n/a
  • BRD MediaFrom $2,500/month
  • Brenton WayProjects from $5,000
  • Brown Bag Marketingprice n/a
  • BusySeedprice n/a
  • CadenceSEOFrom $1,500/month
  • CanestaFrom $1,500/month
  • Canopy Mediaprice n/a
  • Cardinal Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Cegrix Ad Agencyprice n/a
  • CG MediaFrom $2,500/month
  • Charly Agencyprice n/a
  • Chatter Buzzprice n/a
  • Chicago SEO Consultantprice n/a
  • Chicago Style Mediaprice n/a
  • Chicago Tech SolutionsFrom $800/month
  • Chicago Website Design SEO Company (CWDSC)From $650/month
  • Chris Brown SEOFrom $499/month
  • Clarity Online SEOFrom $600/month
  • Click4Corpprice n/a
  • Clickmen™ Digital Marketing Agencyprice n/a
  • Code and Design GroupFrom $299/month
  • Colibri Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Colureprice n/a
  • Comrade Digital MarketingFrom $1,450/month
  • CopifyFrom $599/month
  • CoreX Solutionsprice n/a
  • Cyrusson IncFrom $599/month
  • Dallas SEO AgencyFrom $750/month
  • Dallas SEO CompanyFrom $2,500/month
  • DecographicFrom $2,500/month
  • Designs Legendprice n/a
  • DFW Website SEOprice n/a
  • Dharma Digital Marketing Agencyprice n/a
  • Digital Drew SEMFrom $2,000/month
  • Digital HonchosProjects from $5,000
  • Digital Marketers Chicagoprice n/a
  • Digital Media Ninjaprice n/a
  • Digital RadarProjects from $5,000
  • Digital Successprice n/a
  • Directory Oneprice n/a
  • DiscoverMyBusinessprice n/a
  • DMD Digital SEO Marketing AgencyFrom $1,495/month
  • DollySEOFrom $490/month
  • Double Up Digitalprice n/a
  • Drive Traffic MediaFrom $697/month
  • DUSK Digitalprice n/a
  • E-Platform Marketingprice n/a
  • E67 Agencyprice n/a
  • e9digitalprice n/a
  • eBizUniverseprice n/a
  • Eclipse Marketingprice n/a
  • Enterprise Digital Worldprice n/a
  • EraBright Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • EversiteFrom $199/month
  • EWR DigitalProjects from $5,000
  • Exalt Growthprice n/a
  • Excite Creative Studiosprice n/a
  • Exo Agencyprice n/a
  • Fanatically DigitalFrom $1,250/month
  • Fast Hippo Mediaprice n/a
  • FasturtleProjects from $1,000
  • FDG Webprice n/a
  • Find Local Companyprice n/a
  • fishbatFrom $3,000/month
  • Flamingo AgencyFrom $1,000/month
  • FlightpathFrom $4,500/month
  • Forward Pushprice n/a
  • Four.19 AgencyFrom $1,500/month
  • Fusionteczprice n/a
  • GBC Digital MarketingFrom $1,850/month
  • Geek in NYFrom $360/month
  • Get Visibleprice n/a
  • Green Thumb Localprice n/a
  • Growth Saloonprice n/a
  • Growthopediaprice n/a
  • GrowwwiseFrom $349/month
  • Hawke MediaFrom $7,000/month
  • Hey Day MarketingFrom $3,500/month
  • High Top Digitalprice n/a
  • Houston Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Hozioprice n/a
  • HQDMprice n/a
  • Ice Nine Onlineprice n/a
  • Idea Marketing GroupFrom $4,500/month
  • IgilityFrom $2,500/month
  • Illumination MarketingFrom $2,500/month
  • IMPRiNTFrom $6,500/month
  • Inbound SEO & Google Ads Agencyprice n/a
  • INFINI Marketingprice n/a
  • Insignia SEOProjects from $1,000
  • IntensifyFrom $3,500/month
  • Interactive Theoryprice n/a
  • Internet Marketing Phoenixprice n/a
  • Intrigue IT Solutionsprice n/a
  • iORSOFrom $1,500/month
  • ioVistaprice n/a
  • Ironclad Dynamics LLCprice n/a
  • ITVibesProjects from $10,000
  • Iwiin Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Iwiin Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Jessica Stegner SEOProjects from $750
  • JH SEO AgencyFrom $2,500/month
  • Jives Mediaprice n/a
  • Jordan Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • JOS (Joseph Studios)price n/a
  • JSL Marketing & Web Designprice n/a
  • Juggernaut Digitalprice n/a
  • Just Digital Inc.price n/a
  • K Business Solutions Inc.price n/a
  • KAFURE Consulting Servicesprice n/a
  • Karpi StudioProjects from $15,000
  • Keever SEOFrom $1,000/month
  • KiLLit OnLineprice n/a
  • Kinetik Agencyprice n/a
  • KO Websitesprice n/a
  • Kobe DigitalFrom $3,500/month
  • Kyle Eggleston SEO Consultantprice n/a
  • LAD SolutionsFrom $2,500/month
  • LAv1From $1,800/month
  • LawFirmSEOPro.comprice n/a
  • LawRankFrom $4,000/month
  • Lead Gear Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Leadige Media Groupprice n/a
  • LeadOriginProjects from $5,000
  • Level343price n/a
  • Leverableprice n/a
  • LikeSocialBizFrom $150/month
  • Link Helpersprice n/a
  • LinkGraphFrom $5,000/month
  • Lizardo AgencyFrom $499/month
  • Local SEO Todayprice n/a
  • Logic Inboundprice n/a
  • Loona AgencyFrom $2,000/month
  • Los Angeles SEO Groupprice n/a
  • Los Angeles SEO IncFrom $3,000/month
  • Loud InteractiveFrom $4,500/month
  • Lucius Kingprice n/a
  • MA Teamprice n/a
  • Magnified Mediaprice n/a
  • Mantas AukFrom $500/month
  • Marketasaprice n/a
  • marketFXProjects from $5,000
  • Marketing 1on1price n/a
  • Marketing Eye AtlantaFrom $3,500/month
  • Marketing MavenFrom $3,000/month
  • Maverick Digital LLCprice n/a
  • MeanPugFrom $5,000/month
  • Media Express LLCprice n/a
  • Melleka MarketingFrom $750/month
  • MerkleFrom $25,000/month
  • Miami SEMFrom $750/month
  • Miami SEO Companyprice n/a
  • Mimvi SEOFrom $2,000/month
  • Mindful ConversionFrom $750/month
  • Mission Morphprice n/a
  • Mockingbird Marketingprice n/a
  • Mode EffectProjects from $1,000
  • Modern Practiceprice n/a
  • MuteSixFrom $5,000/month
  • N2SEOprice n/a
  • Nebo Agencyprice n/a
  • NetrocketFrom $500/month
  • NetrocketFrom $500/month
  • New York SEOprice n/a
  • Newman Web SolutionsFrom $600/month
  • Nexus Marketingprice n/a
  • NoGoodFrom $20,000/month
  • Nvent Marketingprice n/a
  • Odd Dog MediaFrom $1,000/month
  • Omojetprice n/a
  • On The Map MarketingFrom $3,000/month
  • One Digital Advertisingprice n/a
  • OneIMSFrom $5,000/month
  • Onmove Digital Agencyprice n/a
  • OpenMovesFrom $4,000/month
  • Operation Technologyprice n/a
  • OptFirst Internet MarketingFrom $2,500/month
  • Orbit Digital StudioFrom $450/month
  • Organic Marketing Prosprice n/a
  • OuterBoxFrom $1,000/month
  • Pacific 54price n/a
  • Page One PowerFrom $4,000/month
  • PantelopeFrom $25,000/month
  • PEER365From $1,000/month
  • Perfect Search MediaFrom $5,000/month
  • Perron Marketing Groupprice n/a
  • Persist MarketingFrom $2,000/month
  • Phoenix AI SEOFrom $1,500/month
  • Phoenix AZ Ad AgencyProjects from $1,000
  • Phoenix Online Mediaprice n/a
  • Phoenix SEO Geekprice n/a
  • Pillar Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Pilot Digital MarketingProjects from $4,250
  • PinnedFrom $500/month
  • Portside Marketingprice n/a
  • Power DigitalFrom $10,000/month
  • Precision Creativeprice n/a
  • Primary Positionprice n/a
  • PrimeViewprice n/a
  • Proceed Innovativeprice n/a
  • Proleadsoftprice n/a
  • Puget Sound Marketing Solutionsprice n/a
  • PX MediaProjects from $1,000
  • Radically Distinctprice n/a
  • Razor Rankprice n/a
  • Readofiaprice n/a
  • Red BanyanFrom $7,500/month
  • Red Clay Commerceprice n/a
  • Red Houston SEO CompanyProjects from $1,000
  • RedBrick Web Solutionsprice n/a
  • Redline Marketing & Dezignprice n/a
  • RedShark SEOFrom $450/month
  • Regex SEOProjects from $5,000
  • ReThinc Advertising & PRprice n/a
  • Retna Mediaprice n/a
  • Ripe MediaFrom $5,000/month
  • Rise InteractiveFrom $15,000/month
  • Rise Localprice n/a
  • RiseOppprice n/a
  • Rocket SEO MiamiFrom $1,800/month
  • Ronkot Designprice n/a
  • Rook Digitalprice n/a
  • Rory Martinprice n/a
  • RuckusFrom $7,000/month
  • SEA Marketingprice n/a
  • Search ControlFrom $500/month
  • Search Minersprice n/a
  • Seattle Digital Flowprice n/a
  • Seattle New Mediaprice n/a
  • Seattle Organic SEOFrom $449/month
  • Seattle PPC Agencyprice n/a
  • Seattle SEOprice n/a
  • SEM.NYCFrom $3,000/month
  • SEO Bustersprice n/a
  • Seo Company Los Angelesprice n/a
  • SEO COMPANY MIAFrom $2,000/month
  • SEO Design ChicagoFrom $1,000/month
  • SEO Fuel MarketingFrom $1,200/month
  • SEO Guru Atlantaprice n/a
  • SEO Guru Houstonprice n/a
  • SEO Houstonprice n/a
  • SEO Impact ProsFrom $1,000/month
  • SEO LAFrom $1,000/month
  • SEO Los Angeles 24price n/a
  • SEO Marketing LAFrom $2,500/month
  • SEO MiamiFrom $2,000/month
  • SEO Miamiprice n/a
  • SEO NobleFrom $1,800/month
  • SEO Phoenixprice n/a
  • SEO PRO Marvelprice n/a
  • SEO Services New Yorkprice n/a
  • SEO SociallyFrom $597/month
  • SEO-Exchangeprice n/a
  • SEOBERGFrom $200/month
  • SEOflyprice n/a
  • SEOLEVELUPFrom $695/month
  • Seota Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Siege MediaFrom $6,000/month
  • Signa MarketingProjects from $5,000
  • Simple SEO Groupprice n/a
  • Simply Digital Marketing Groupprice n/a
  • Sitrick And CompanyFrom $10,000/month
  • Sixth City Marketingprice n/a
  • Sky SEO Digitalprice n/a
  • Slim Martyprice n/a
  • SmartSitesFrom $750/month
  • Social Caliprice n/a
  • Social LinusFrom $997/month
  • Soderman SEOProjects from $1,000
  • Solid DigitalFrom $2,500/month
  • Sosemoprice n/a
  • Splinternet MarketingFrom $242/month
  • Stable Solutions Digital MarketingFrom $2,000/month
  • Star Tech SEOFrom $400/month
  • Staylistedprice n/a
  • Stellar SEOFrom $3,500/month
  • Straight NorthFrom $5,000/month
  • Striventa$150 - $199/hour
  • StudioHawkprice n/a
  • SugarFree DesignsProjects from $5,000
  • Superpathprice n/a
  • Sure OakFrom $5,000/month
  • Surge Marketingprice n/a
  • Swarm Digitalprice n/a
  • Symphony AdvertisingFrom $1,250/month
  • Taktical DigitalFrom $5,000/month
  • Techwoodprice n/a
  • The Chicago Marketing AgencyFrom $1,500/month
  • The Design Boutiqueprice n/a
  • The Los Angeles SEO CompanyFrom $2,800/month
  • The Miami SEO CompanyFrom $3,000/month
  • The Uptown Agencyprice n/a
  • TheeHouston.Agencyprice n/a
  • Thomas Digital Web DesignFrom $500/month
  • ThriveFrom $2,500/month
  • Thrive Internet Marketing AgencyFrom $1,000/month
  • Thrive SEO NYCFrom $497/month
  • Tobie GroupProjects from $1,000
  • Top BrosFrom $2,000/month
  • Top Local SEO Services LLCprice n/a
  • Top New York SEO Companyprice n/a
  • Top Notch DezignsFrom $2,500/month
  • TopSpot Internet MarketingProjects from $1,000
  • TridenceFrom $2,500/month
  • Triforce Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • True Digital Marketingprice n/a
  • Trueba Mediaprice n/a
  • Trustex BrandingFrom $439/month
  • TurnKey Website DesignFrom $1,400/month
  • TwinLeoFrom $399/month
  • Unified Marketingprice n/a
  • UP Advertisingprice n/a
  • Urban InsightFrom $8,500/month
  • USA SEO Consultantprice n/a
  • uSERPFrom $10,000/month
  • V Digital Servicesprice n/a
  • VAB Media Digital Agencyprice n/a
  • Van West MediaFrom $3,000/month
  • Venz Mediaprice n/a
  • Verbsz Marketingprice n/a
  • Versa CreativeProjects from $1,000
  • Verve Marketing Groupprice n/a
  • Veza DigitalProjects from $25,000
  • VICE SEOprice n/a
  • ViewRankingprice n/a
  • Web Chimpyprice n/a
  • Webbify Studioprice n/a
  • WebDesk Solutionprice n/a
  • WebFXFrom $1,000/month
  • Webinopolyprice n/a
  • WEBRISFrom $5,000/month
  • Website DepotFrom $995/month
  • White Shark MediaFrom $3,500/month
  • Widely InteractiveFrom $1,500/month
  • Windy City DigitalFrom $1,500/month
  • Wise Advertisementprice n/a
  • Wise Roots Marketing AgencyFrom $1,500/month
  • WpromoteFrom $7,000/month
  • X Miami SEO Companyprice n/a
  • YellowFin Digitalprice n/a
  • Youtechprice n/a
  • Zen Den Web Designprice n/a

Only Vendar profile tags name SEO audit; no outside source on file yet. (7)

  • DabaranFrom $2,500/month
  • Digital SilkFrom $6,000/month
  • Lounge LizardFrom $5,000/month
  • SeedXFrom $6,000/month
  • Single GrainFrom $5,000/month
  • Sunlight MediaFrom $49/month
  • VisualFizzFrom $5,000/month

Sources on file say the vendor offers SEO audit; no case study or client review documents the work yet. (3)

  • DirectiveFrom $6,000/month
  • Milyon DigitalFrom $2,500/month
  • WiidemanFrom $5,000/month
Frequently asked questions (6)
How many Seattle SEO agencies have documented SEO audit work?
0 of the 22 SEO agencies Vendar tracks in Seattle have at least one SEO audit claim on file under the published rubric, and 39 more from other cities join the ranking with documented SEO audit work; 4 of the 39 ranked have an outside source naming it, and 4 have one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 22 Seattle agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which Seattle SEO audit agency fits my type of business?
By the clients named in their documented SEO audit work: Multi-location businesses: Vizion Interactive (#30); Home and trade services: SiteRyze Digital Marketing (#38); Shops, restaurants and retail: Coalition Technologies (#1). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does SEO audit cost in Seattle?
Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $200/month and the median floor is $3,000/month. 25 of 39 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?
17 of 39 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified. The lowest disclosed floor among verified agencies is GO-SEO at $750/month.
How is this list different from the Seattle SEO page?
The Seattle SEO page ranks every SEO agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with SEO audit evidence on file, scores them on the SEO audit query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
The newest profile verification among ranked agencies is September 27, 2026; the newest evidence claim was checked on November 3, 2026. Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
Get my shortlistMachine-readable versionAll details ↓
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓Close ↑
D1Full ranking table39 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1Coalition Technologies753016.21.89.47.54.750.927/2Sep 13, 2026
2HawkSEM591616.24.37.2104.11.30.83/0Apr 27, 2026
3Walker Sands572016.20.47.21021.30.942/1Jun 2, 2026
4Orbit Media5515.816.20.67.2104.11.30.86/0Not verified
5SEO Image5416.916.21.37.2102.900.84/0Sep 13, 2026
6AdsRole54816.28.46.67.545-20.81/0Not verified
7iPullRank5013.516.21.65.11003.80.83/0Not verified
8Marcel Digital501216.20.77.2103.800.82/0Jun 2, 2026
9Visible Factors491513.38.37.27.500-20.83/0Sep 27, 2026
10Icepop491216.22.33104.21.30.82/0Jun 2, 2026
11SPINX Digital49616.20.57.2103.650.81/0Jun 2, 2026
12Hennessey Digital4815.516.21.37.2502.50.83/0Sep 27, 2026
13GO-SEO481116.26.87.21000-30.82/0Sep 12, 2026
14BizIQ4889.78.37.27.54.65-20.81/0Not verified
15Digital Authority Partners471216.20.27.21001.30.82/0Sep 13, 2026
16GR046916.22.73103.81.30.81/0Sep 13, 2026
17RSA Creative Studio451213.38.34.27.51.20-20.82/0Not verified
18Main Street ROI45916.20.67.2104.90-30.81/0Not verified
19Storm Brain44812.80.27.27.54.43.80.81/0Jun 2, 2026
20HVSEO431710.38.47.202.40-20.82/2Not verified
21Optimum743816.20.17.21001.30.81/0Sep 13, 2026
22Search Engine Projects43816.23.83102.100.81/0Apr 27, 2026
23Bliss Drive42614.83.77.2103.10-30.81/0Sep 27, 2026
24SEO Optimizers411210.38.17.204.90-20.82/0Not verified
25Earn SEO40616.28.1353.80-20.81/0Not verified
26Stackmatix381212.810.43500-50.82/0Not verified
27B2BSEO.io38813.37.94.87.51.20-50.81/0Sep 27, 2026
28NYC SEO Pro361210.312.93000-20.82/0Not verified
29Marqade INC3412.56.88.732.511.3-20.83/0Not verified
30Vizion Interactive331110.397.2000-50.82/0Not verified
31Relevance Advisors31910.313.83000-50.81/0Not verified
32Raging Agency3186.88.54.2050-20.81/0Not verified
33NIXAR Solutions301110.310.92.4000-50.82/0Not verified
34ICONIER301010.38.43000-20.81/1Not verified
35SEO Guru NYC30810.38.1302.40-20.81/0Not verified
36LocalFi: SEO Digital Marketing Agency2766.88.1304.80-20.81/0Not verified
37Dallas SEO Dogs26910.38.73000-50.81/0Not verified
38SiteRyze Digital Marketing26910.39.12.4000-50.82/0Not verified
39Connect Media Agency2486.88.56000-50.81/0Not verified

Pool 22 · ranked 39 · unranked 413 (7 with profile tags only) · verified 17 · pricing disclosed 25 · case studies on file 169 · an outside source names the work 4 · an outside document describes it 4 · lowest verified floor GO-SEO $750/month

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 Coalition Technologies75/100 · High confidence 0.92

Confirmed by an independent source · national coverage · From $1,800/month · hourly $110/hour · projects from $1,000 · 313 claims on file

Evidence for this query30/3017 SEO audit claims on file: 2 third-party, 4 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 3 distinct sites; C. A. reviewed Coalition Technologies, stating that Coalition Technologies performed a website audit for their women's retail store to… (verified-reviews.com, verified); Coalition Technologies lists website audits, content optimization, mobile accessibility, design and development, testing and QA, and… (adacompliantwebdesign.com, verified)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $1,800/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth1.8/150.11915 of 82 listed services are SEO services; 7 of 313 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability9.4/100.9359999999999999In business since 2009; Client retention 84% (documented)
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed (From $1,800/month); Team size 250+; Process not documented
Reputation4.7/50.94281 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility5/516 recognitions with a source on file: Ordergroove partner, Klaviyo partner, a press mention per growave.io, an award per partners.ordergroove.com, an award per partners.dotdigital.com, a press mention per partners.teamworkcommerce.com; Sources: partners.ordergroove.com, checked Oct 2026; connect.klaviyo.com, checked Oct 2026; growave.io, checked Oct 2026; partners.dotdigital.com, checked Oct 2026; 1 more
  • C. A. reviewed Coalition Technologies, stating that Coalition Technologies performed a website audit for their women's retail store to identify areas of improvement and recommend fixes and solutions.

    Independent source · verified-reviews.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • Coalition Technologies lists website audits, content optimization, mobile accessibility, design and development, testing and QA, and maintenance and monitoring as services.

    Independent source · adacompliantwebdesign.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1 · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • Coalition Technologies' case study for Asphalt Kingdom, a B2B ecommerce supplier of asphalt equipment and materials on Magento, says the work began "with a full technical and content audit to identify ranking losses, crawl issues, duplicate pages, and missed internal linking opportunities", alongside AI SEO work. It reports AI search sessions up 766.9% year over year and users arriving from AI platforms up 604%; the paid-search results in the same engagement are reported separately.

    Agency's own words · coalitiontechnologies.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • A client states Coalition Technologies completed an SEO audit for their metal fabrication shop and delivered the final project deliverable within a few weeks.

    Agency's own words · coalitiontechnologies.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • A technical SEO audit of the Microsoft Bing Maps website found issues that Coalition then fixed, including title tags, meta descriptions, headers, image sizes, alt text, redirect chains, server errors, and redirect errors.

    Agency's own words · coalitiontechnologies.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • A client states Coalition Technologies performed an SEO audit of a small business website, providing an extensive review with detailed suggestions of fixes to enhance the SEO.

    Agency's own words · coalitiontechnologies.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Listed service on Vendar: SEO Audit.

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.3 · checked Sep 13, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.8 from 254 reviews; Trustpilot 4.2 from 27 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Los Angeles SEO, Ecommerce SEO, Lead generation SEO, Los Angeles ecommerce development

#2 HawkSEM59/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $1,515/month · 100 claims on file

Evidence for this query16/300.53299999999999993 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 1 distinct site; HawkSEM documented an SEO recovery for DesktopReady after a new website launch caused a traffic slump, with a technical SEO audit, content… (hawksem.com, claimed); HawkSEM's case study for Prismatic, an embedded integration platform for B2B software teams, describes it as a startup new to an existing… (hawksem.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $1,515/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth4.3/150.28714 of 28 listed services are SEO services; 3 of 100 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2006; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $1,515/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.1/50.824000000000000147 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: Meta Business Partner; Sources: velocityppc.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified April 2026; details may have changed since.

  • HawkSEM documented an SEO recovery for DesktopReady after a new website launch caused a traffic slump, with a technical SEO audit, content work, and social media SEO support. Results included increased users by 409%, backlinks grown from 822 to 1,340, and SERP terms jumping from 4 to 468.

    Agency's own words · hawksem.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • HawkSEM's case study for Prismatic, an embedded integration platform for B2B software teams, describes it as a startup new to an existing industry that needed to rank for low-volume product terms. HawkSEM ran keyword research and a competitor gap analysis, a content audit, meta and header optimisation and long-form pillar guides. It reports top-3 keyword rankings up 228% and ranking keywords up 67%.

    Agency's own words · hawksem.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • Listed service on Vendar: SEO Audit.

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.3 · checked Apr 27, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.9 from 46 reviews; Trustpilot 3.2 from 1 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): B2B / SaaS, Content-led SEO, Ecommerce SEO

#3 Walker Sands57/100 · High confidence 0.94

Confirmed by an independent source · national coverage · From $10,000/month · hourly $200 - $299 · projects from $12,000 · 219 claims on file

Evidence for this query20/300.6672 SEO audit claims on file: 1 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 2 distinct sites; Sitebulb's customer case study describes a technical audit by Walker Sands for a large B2B predictive-analytics client whose site had… (sitebulb.com, verified); Walker Sands performed early work for client Sendbird that included persona research, an SEO audit and paid channel setup, and played a… (walkersands.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $10,000/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth0.4/150.0283 of 92 listed services are SEO services; 2 of 219 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2001; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $10,000/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation2/50.4066 third-party reviews at 4.8
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: Inc. 5000; Sources: finance.yahoo.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Sitebulb's customer case study describes a technical audit by Walker Sands for a large B2B predictive-analytics client whose site had fallen to "9 URLs in Google's index, 7 of which were PDFs". Crawling and JavaScript rendering analysis, with Lighthouse and page-speed checks, traced the drop to PWA configuration, user-agent redirects, oversized JavaScript bundles and scroll events hiding content from Googlebot. After the fixes, traffic to blog URLs rose 158%, to product category URLs 509%, and organic conversions 80%. The page gives no timeframe; the account comes from Walker Sands.

    Independent source · sitebulb.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1.2 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Walker Sands performed early work for client Sendbird that included persona research, an SEO audit and paid channel setup, and played a key role in Sendbird's Marketo standup, lead scoring optimization and paid campaign tracking integrations.

    Agency's own words · walkersands.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.8 from 6 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): B2B Demand Gen, Full-funnel Growth, Revenue Growth, Attribution / Analytics

#4 Orbit Media55/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $4,500/month · hourly $150 - $199 · projects from $4,500 · 238 claims on file

Evidence for this query15.8/300.5276 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 6 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Orbit Media worked with Sonatype, which helps enterprises improve their software supply chain, on site audits and remediation (indexing… (orbitmedia.com, claimed); Orbit Media's own case study for Plum Diamonds starts with a technical audit ("Audit the technical aspects inhibiting growth") and a… (orbitmedia.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $4,500/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth0.6/150.0391 of 63 listed services are SEO services; 6 of 238 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2001; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $4,500/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.1/50.82848 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: WE Awards; Sources: we-awards.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Orbit Media worked with Sonatype, which helps enterprises improve their software supply chain, on site audits and remediation (indexing, images, backlinks and page speed), subdomain migration, AI-powered page upgrades, and CRO testing. Results include a 13% increase in keywords ranking on page one of Google, a 243% YoY increase in organic traffic cost, a 61% YoY increase for a key conversion event, and improved Core Web Vitals scores.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Orbit Media's own case study for Plum Diamonds starts with a technical audit ("Audit the technical aspects inhibiting growth") and a content architecture review that found why Google was not rewarding the site's content; the fixes restructured URL structures and rewrote metadata site-wide. Within six months the site's top-three ranking keywords rose 633% and engaged sessions from organic search 116%.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Orbit Media provides ongoing SEO and optimization services to Heroku, a cloud platform for building and scaling apps, including technical audits, site clean-up, CRO and SEO work, and content updates.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • As part of the Altium engagement, Orbit's Optimization team performed mobile, linking, indexing, and technical audits and recommendations, along with keyword research, keyword mapping for key landing pages, and CRO updates and testing.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Orbit Media performed a content and technical audit for Exostar as the first step of an ongoing SEO optimization engagement.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Orbit Media built content aligned to search intent for Exostar through keyword research, competitor analysis, content audits, and ongoing optimization, helping Exostar improve visibility for non-branded topics and attract more qualified traffic.

    Agency's own words · orbitmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.9 from 48 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Content-led SEO, SEO for Conversion Growth, Traffic Growth SEO, SEO Agencies with Case Studies

#5 SEO Image54/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $1,500/month · projects from $4,000 · 96 claims on file

Evidence for this query16.9/300.5634 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 4 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; SEO Image's own case study for Related Rentals, a real-estate rental site built largely in Flash, describes a 55-page enterprise SEO audit… (seoimage.com, claimed); SEO Image's own case study says it "developed a customized enterprise SEO training and consulting program for Law.com": SEO training for… (seoimage.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $1,500/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names professional services clients
Capability depth1.3/150.0863 of 44 listed services are SEO services; 4 of 96 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2002; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $1,500/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation2.9/50.576000000000000114 third-party reviews at 4.9
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

  • SEO Image's own case study for Related Rentals, a real-estate rental site built largely in Flash, describes a 55-page enterprise SEO audit that "reviewed site architecture, crawlability, indexing barriers, templates, page structure, internal linking", and SEO requirements handed to programmers and designers for a technical redesign and migration. Reported over a 4+ year engagement: 13x growth in tracked keyword visibility and 14 regional properties in the Google top 10. The page gives no start date.

    Agency's own words · seoimage.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • SEO Image's own case study says it "developed a customized enterprise SEO training and consulting program for Law.com": SEO training for "more than 250 staff and freelance legal journalists" covering research, topic selection, headlines, internal linking and editorial workflow, plus targeted SEO audits and strategic guidance for the wider ALM Media marketing team. Estimated monthly organic visits rose 131%, from 128,114 to 295,598, and top-three keyword visibility doubled.

    Agency's own words · seoimage.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Over a 4+ year engagement, SEO Image delivered a 55-page enterprise SEO audit, implementation guidance, on-page optimization, and link-building for a major Manhattan real estate developer, producing Top 10 rankings for 14 regional properties and Top 5 visibility for terms including 'Apartment Rentals.'

    Agency's own words · seoimage.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • SEO Image developed and delivered a 43-slide enterprise SEO training program for Law.com's writing team of more than 250 staff and freelance legal journalists, including targeted SEO audits and strategic guidance for ALM Media. Estimated monthly organic traffic increased from 128,114 to 295,598, and Top 3 keyword visibility grew from 1,623 to 3,250 rankings.

    Agency's own words · seoimage.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.9 from 14 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Local SEO, High-Ticket, SEO Strategy, Proven Results

#6 AdsRole54/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $399/month · 21 claims on file

Evidence for this query8/300.2671 SEO audit claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; For the Fossil client, AdsRole performed a complete technical SEO audit, improved crawlability and indexing, optimized site architecture… (adsrole.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Houston, TX, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $399/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names ecommerce clients
Capability depth8.4/150.561 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 1 of 21 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability6.6/100.66In business since 2017; Retention not documented
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed (From $399/month); Team size 501-1000; Process not documented
Reputation4/50.8189 third-party reviews at 4.0
Market credibility5/514 recognitions with a source on file: Google Partner, Meta Business Partner, HubSpot Partner, Shopify Partner; Sources: greatworkguild.com, checked Nov 2026

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • For the Fossil client, AdsRole performed a complete technical SEO audit, improved crawlability and indexing, optimized site architecture, and enhanced mobile performance and page speed.

    Agency's own words · adsrole.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.1 from 100 reviews; Trustpilot 3.9 from 89 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#7 iPullRank50/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $7,000/month · projects from $7,000 · 66 claims on file

Evidence for this query13.5/300.453 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; iPullRank documents SEO work for one of the world’s largest banks in the mortgage lending industry, including an SEO site audit, technical… (ipullrank.com, claimed); For a large enterprise mortgage-lending bank, iPullRank conducted an extensive SEO site audit covering external link structure, site… (ipullrank.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from New York, NY, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $7,000/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names enterprise clients
Capability depth1.6/150.1071 of 10 listed services are SEO services; 3 of 66 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability5.1/100.508Founding year not disclosed; Client retention 82% (documented)
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $7,000/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility3.8/50.753 recognitions with a source on file: Search Engine Land Awards 2025, a press mention per searchengineland.com, a press mention per websiteclosers.com; Sources: searchengineland.com, checked Nov 2026; websiteclosers.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified April 2026; details may have changed since.

  • iPullRank documents SEO work for one of the world’s largest banks in the mortgage lending industry, including an SEO site audit, technical fixes, and a content plan. The page reports $2.4 billion in incremental revenue.

    Agency's own words · ipullrank.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For a large enterprise mortgage-lending bank, iPullRank conducted an extensive SEO site audit covering external link structure, site architecture, and content, then fixed technical site issues and tracked changes with a rigorous implementation audit.

    Agency's own words · ipullrank.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Mortgage-industry case study reports large conversion, keyword, and top-3 keyword gains from technical SEO, content audit, content planning, and content creation.

    Agency's own words · ipullrank.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Best for (profile): Technical SEO, Content-led, B2B / SaaS, Case Studies

#8 Marcel Digital50/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $6,000/month · hourly $150 - $199 · projects from $6,000 · 303 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Marcel Digital's own case study for Arbour Group, a regulatory-compliance provider for the life sciences, describes a comprehensive SEO… (marceldigital.com, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Chicago, IL, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $6,000/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth0.7/150.0458 of 108 listed services are SEO services; 2 of 303 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2003; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $6,000/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation3.8/50.76842 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • Marcel Digital's own case study for Arbour Group, a regulatory-compliance provider for the life sciences, describes a comprehensive SEO audit of the organization's search performance and "a full backlink audit to remove toxic, low-quality links that were harming trust and rankings", followed by rewritten and restructured service pages. Reported: organic traffic +22% in 2019 against 2018 and +149% against 2016, and goal completions +120%.

    Agency's own words · marceldigital.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Listed service on Vendar: SEO Audit.

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.3 · checked Jun 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.7 from 42 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): B2B Demand Gen, Conversion Rate Optimization, Landing Page Optimization, Attribution / Analytics

#9 Visible Factors49/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · Projects from $5,000 · hourly $200-$300 · projects from $5,000 · 68 claims on file

Evidence for this query15/300.53 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Visible Factors provided Ticketmaster with SEO strategy and technical SEO audits, and organic search traffic increased 17% in users and… (visiblefactors.com, claimed); Visible Factors built an SEO program for Heymarket centered on content marketing, beginning with an SEO audit that included on-page SEO… (visiblefactors.com, claimed)
Fit to this query13.3/250.53Serves Seattle from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Projects from $5,000; no monthly floor disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth8.3/150.5551 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 3 of 68 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2014; Retention not documented
Transparency7.5/100.75Pricing disclosed (Projects from $5,000); Team size 10-49; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Visible Factors provided Ticketmaster with SEO strategy and technical SEO audits, and organic search traffic increased 17% in users and 34% in page views year over year.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Visible Factors built an SEO program for Heymarket centered on content marketing, beginning with an SEO audit that included on-page SEO best practices and technical SEO requirements, and later scaling content with industry SMS pages and a resource page strategy.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Visible Factors built an SEO program for Heymarket centered on content marketing, starting with an SEO audit and including technical SEO requirements, landing page recommendations, and an editorial calendar with keyword research.

    Agency's own words · visiblefactors.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#10 Icepop49/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · national coverage · From $5,500/month · 128 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 SEO audit claims on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 1 profile signal; outside claims from 1 distinct site; icepop's case study for NuWatt Lighting, a family-owned commercial and residential lighting company headquartered in Los Angeles, says the… (icepop.co, claimed)
Fit to this query16.2/250.65Serves Seattle from Los Angeles, CA, USA; no local office on file; Retainers from $5,500/month, inside the SEO audit band; Profile names saas clients
Capability depth2.3/150.15615 of 55 listed services are SEO services; 2 of 128 claims on file concern SEO audit
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $5,500/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.2/50.83145 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: Gold Stevie Award; Sources: under30ceo.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names SEO audit work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Last verified June 2026; details may have changed since.

  • icepop's case study for NuWatt Lighting, a family-owned commercial and residential lighting company headquartered in Los Angeles, says the work started "with a full SEO audit" and restructured paid media, content and email over several years. It reports organic revenue up 199%; the headline rise in monthly revenue is credited to SEO, paid media and conversion work together.

    Agency's own words · icepop.co · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Oct 31, 2026

  • Listed service on Vendar: SEO Audit.

    Vendar profile field · Vendar profile · internal_signal: status on file · weight 0.3 · checked Jun 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 45 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): Customer acquisition, Paid search, Growth marketing

Positions 11 to 39: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.09.1

A claim counts as SEO-audit evidence when a source on file describes an audit the agency delivered: a technical, site, content or backlink audit, what it found, and ideally which recommendations were implemented and what changed afterwards. Case studies and reviews in which the audit led to shipped fixes and a measured result carry the most weight. Accessibility and paid-search audits are different services and do not count. A Vendar service listing or profile tag is our own label and never earns a rank on its own.

Terms that count:
seo audit, seo audits, technical audit, technical audits, technical seo audit, technical seo audits, site audit, site audits, website audit, website audits, content audit, content audits, backlink audit, backlink audits, link audit, audit findings, audit recommendations
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names SEO audit work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports SEO audit under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
SEO Audit 2026.09.1
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/marketing/seo/seattle/audit

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring

Seattle buyer context

What an SEO audit should leave you with

An audit earns its price when it separates technical blockers, content gaps and conversion problems, and says which to fix first. A crawl export is not an audit: it is the raw material for one.

Fit
  • Inspects templates and the pages that earn money, not only a crawler's issue list.
  • Reads Search Console and log data for what is actually crawled and indexed in Seattle.
  • Hands over a prioritised plan your developers and writers can start on Monday.
Proof
  • Show a redacted audit you delivered and the roadmap that came out of it.
  • Which pages would you look at first here, and why those?
  • What did you decide not to fix on that project, and what did it cost to leave?
Budget
  • Ranked here and disclosing a monthly minimum: 21, from $200 to $10K.
  • Middle of that range: about $3K a month.
  • 18 of the 39 ranked agencies do not publish a minimum; ask on the first call.

Other Seattle SEO scenarios

All SEOLocal SEOSmall BusinessB2B / SaaSEcommerceEnterpriseTechnicalAI SearchContent-ledMultilingualConsultingRetainerRecovery

SEO Audit in other cities

Los AngelesNew YorkChicagoMiami