Ranks in the top three for at least one question. Most of its claims match the sources they cite. None of its 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #2 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Seattle, of 6 · also in 11 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses, enterprises) and the industries on file (nonprofit, franchise).
- You need the minimum term and setup fee in writing before you commit: neither is published.
Starting price is at the median of ranked agencies for this question.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Few outside reviews mention SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer work specifically.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #1 Seattle Organic SEO52Ranks above on this question#1#2 this oneScore5250Independent00PriceFrom $449/monthFrom $1,000 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #3 SEA Marketing43Ranks below on this question#3#2 this oneScore4350Independent00Pricenot disclosedFrom $1,000 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Odd Dog Media.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#2 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Seattle: 50/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 25 | 100% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 13.8 | 92% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 5 | 50% |
|
| Reputationweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed2 of 2 on file · 0 of 2 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 2 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 2. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget 2 · SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer 2 · SEO Consulting 1. The full ledger of 2 is on the proof page.
Andrew Pooch says Odd Dog’s SEO, social media, and blogging work helped achieve higher search rankings, conversions, and web traffic. He also says Odd Dog rebuilt the website to be more friendly for emerging technologies.
Agency's own wordsodd.dogclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
"Their SEO, social media, and blogging knowledge propelled us to higher search ranking, which increased our conversions and web traffic. We're building equity for the future and can thank Odd Dog for the growth of our audience. They also helped rebuild our website to be more friendly for emerging technologies, which has benefitted all our efforts."
Odd Dog Media lists SEO consulting for Holly Yee Floral Architecture in its portfolio.
Agency's own wordsodd.dogclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO ConsultingSEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly BudgetSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
Holly Yee Floral Architecture | SEO Consulting SEO Consulting
Positions in every ranking12 rankings
12 positions: 12 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer · Seattleon its own published cases | #2 of 6 | 50 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget · Seattleon its own published cases | #4 of 5 | 50 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · Seattleon its own published cases | #4 of 15 | 50 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · Atlantaon its own published cases | #7 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · Dallason its own published cases | #7 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
7 more positionsHide the other 7
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Consulting · Houstonon its own published cases | #7 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #7 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · Miamion its own published cases | #7 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · New Yorkon its own published cases | #7 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #7 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · Phoenixon its own published cases | #8 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Consulting · Chicagoon its own published cases | #9 of 15 | 41 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Seattle, WA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Seattle, WA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_business, enterpriseVendar profile field
- Industries
- Nonprofit, FranchiseVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Andrew Pooch, Holly Yee Floral ArchitectureIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $1,000 per month, retainer
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- $1,000 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer $1,000 (3 of 6 disclose) · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget $875 (5 of 5 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee10/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 2 work claims2/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 2 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 2 confirmed, 0 partly, of 2 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 2 of 215/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO consulting work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 2 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Fewer than three external evidence claims are normalized.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 2 of 2 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 2 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (2 named)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.