Ranks in the top three, and most of its claims match the sources they cite, but the record lacks one thing a decision needs; the agency can add it through the claim form, and the verdict updates with the data. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Missing: a published price with a unit (monthly floor, project minimum or hourly rate). Correct the data about this company
Best position #3 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Seattle, of 6 · also in 11 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (law firms, retails) and the industries on file (retail, legal).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 2 of 3 results with a number do not say what year they were measured.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #2 Odd Dog Media50Ranks above on this question#2#3 this oneScore5043Independent00PriceFrom $1,000/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #4 Actuate Media41Ranks below on this question#4#3 this oneScore4143Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for SEA Marketing.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#3 SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer in Seattle: 43/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 13.5 | 45% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 13.8 | 92% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 4.8 | 48% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Local SEO 2 · SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer 3 · Technical SEO 1 · B2B SaaS SEO 1 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 1. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
SEA Marketing rebuilt the local SEO strategy and optimized 120 product pages for a Seattle-based outdoor retailer. Organic traffic increased 340% in 6 months.
Agency's own wordsseamrkt.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 6 monthsLocal SEOSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
E-commerce SEO, 340% organic traffic lift Seattle-based outdoor retailer. We rebuilt their local SEO strategy, optimized 120 product pages, and earned featured snippets for 38 high-volume keywords. View this service 340% Organic traffic increase in 6 months
SEA Marketing addressed technical SEO and content for a Kirkland B2B SaaS company by fixing crawl budget, building a topical authority structure, and creating 45 SEO-optimized guides. Demo requests increased 6× over 8 months.
Agency's own wordsseamrkt.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workover 8 monthsTechnical SEOB2B SaaS SEOSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
Enterprise SEO for a SaaS startup, 6× demo requests A Kirkland B2B SaaS company needed technical SEO + content. We fixed crawl budget, built a topical authority structure, and created 45 SEO-optimized guides. View this service 6× Demo request increase over 8 months
SEA Marketing reports that a Puyallup home-services company’s Google rating rose from 3.2★ to 4.8★ in 90 days after a reputation turnaround that included deploying a review funnel.
Agency's own wordsseamrkt.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 90 daysQuote from the source page
4.8★ Google rating in 90 days Reputation turnaround Puyallup home-services company, deployed review funnel, reversed from 3.2★ to 4.8★.
SEA Marketing reports a 340% organic traffic lift for a Seattle retailer after rebuilding its local SEO strategy, optimizing 120 product pages, and earning featured snippets.
Agency's own wordsseamrkt.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workLocal SEOSEO Agencies on a Monthly RetainerQuote from the source page
340% Organic traffic lift E-commerce SEO Seattle retailer, rebuilt local SEO strategy, optimized 120 product pages, earned featured snippets.
SEA Marketing reports a 28% conversion rate boost for a Bellevue law firm after a redesign for speed and accessibility that cut load time in half.
Agency's own wordsseamrkt.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
28% Conversion rate boost Law firm redesign Bellevue law firm, redesigned for speed & accessibility, cut load time in half, lifted conversions.
Positions in every ranking12 rankings
12 positions: 12 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer · Seattleon its own published cases | #3 of 6 | 43 | 3 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Local SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #7 of 12 | 43 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Seattleon its own published cases | #4 of 10 | 38 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #81 of 87 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #82 of 87 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
7 more positionsHide the other 7
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #82 of 87 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #82 of 87 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #104 of 115 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #59 of 87 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #80 of 115 | 34 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #83 of 88 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #106 of 116 | 25 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Seattle, WA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Seattle, WA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- legal, retailVendar profile field
- Industries
- Retail, LegalVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Seattle-based outdoor retailer, Puyallup home-services company, Bellevue law firmIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer $1,000 (3 of 6 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $1,000 (5 of 10 disclose) · Local SEO $750 (6 of 12 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 88 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2020Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size, logo14/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: entry price, hourly rate, setup fee7/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 3 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims17/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 3 of 320/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (2 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.