Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #5 SEO for High-Ticket Services in Seattle, of 10
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (local service businesses, law firms, healthcare providers) and the industries on file (healthcare, real estate, home services).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #4 SEA Marketing38Ranks above on this question#4#5 this oneScore3837Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #6 Mindful Conversion36Ranks below on this question#6#5 this oneScore3637Independent00PriceFrom $750/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Seattle SEO.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#5 SEO for High-Ticket Services in Seattle: 37/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.6 | 71% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 4.8 | 48% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for High-Ticket Services 1. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
Mark T., a plumbing company owner, says that after working with Seattle SEO, his business ranked in the top 3 for “plumber Kirkland” within four months and calls picked up noticeably.
Agency's own wordsseattleseo.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workWithin four monthsQuote from the source page
“Before working with Seattle SEO, we weren’t showing up in the Map Pack at all for our main keywords. Within four months we were ranking in the top 3 for ‘plumber Kirkland’ and the calls picked up noticeably.”
A plumbing company owner says that after working with Seattle SEO for four months, they ranked in the top 3 for “plumber Kirkland” and calls picked up noticeably.
Agency's own wordsseattleseo.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workWithin four monthsQuote from the source page
“Before working with Seattle SEO, we weren’t showing up in the Map Pack at all for our main keywords. Within four months we were ranking in the top 3 for ‘plumber Kirkland’ and the calls picked up noticeably.”
David R., an HVAC business owner, says Seattle SEO audited the business's site in week one and identified three issues the previous agency had missed. The review does not state a result beyond those findings.
Agency's own wordsseattleseo.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin week oneQuote from the source page
“We’d tried another agency for a year with minimal results. SeattleSEO.net audited our site in week one and identified three issues the previous agency had missed completely.”
A family law attorney says Seattle SEO's monthly reports are clear and rankings are trending up.
Agency's own wordsseattleseo.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
“They actually explain what they’re doing and why. Monthly reports are clear, rankings are trending up, and I’m not wondering where my money is going.”
An HVAC business owner says Seattle SEO audited their site in week one and identified three issues the previous agency had missed.
Agency's own wordsseattleseo.netclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin week oneQuote from the source page
“We’d tried another agency for a year with minimal results. SeattleSEO.net audited our site in week one and identified three issues the previous agency had missed completely.”
Positions in every ranking1 ranking
1 position: 1 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 1 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Seattleon its own published cases | #5 of 10 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Seattle, WA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Seattle, WA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- local_service_business, legal, healthcare_providerVendar profile field
- Industries
- Healthcare, Real Estate, Home Services, DentalVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- none namedIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO for High-Ticket Services $1,000 (5 of 10 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2020Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size, logo14/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 2 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims13/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO for high-ticket services work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (2 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (0 named)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.