Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #8 Technical SEO in Atlanta, of 10 · also in 4 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (local businesses, enterprises, ecommerce brands) and the industries on file (ecommerce, healthcare, home services).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a Technical SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #7 Red Clay Commerce35Ranks above on this question#7#8 this oneScore3530Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #9 Enterprise Digital World27Ranks below on this question#9#8 this oneScore2730Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for SEO Guru Atlanta.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#8 Technical SEO in Atlanta: 30/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 6 | 20% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.9 | 64% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.8 | 65% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed7 of 7 on file · 0 of 7 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 7 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 7. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Technical SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 7 is on the proof page.
SEO Guru Atlanta reports that, following a website redevelopment and domain migration, the campaign recorded 2,268 tracked calls from November 2025 through September 2026. The page says call volume rose from 98 in March to 239 in September, an increase of approximately 144%; this is recorded call activity, not a count of unique customers or booked jobs.
Agency's own wordsseoguruatlanta.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workNovember 2025 through September 2026Quote from the source page
Following the website redevelopment and domain migration, the campaign recorded 2,268 tracked calls from November 2025 through September 2026. Of those calls, 2,240 were answered, and just 28 were missed. Call volume reached 411 in December 2025, fluctuated during the transition, and rose from 98 in March to 239 in September, an increase of approximately 144% between March and September. Call tracking provides a measure of customer contact activity alongside SEO, Google Ads, Meta advertising, and Google Business Profile performance. The total represents recorded calls, not a count of unique customers or booked jobs.
SEO Guru Atlanta reports that new-domain search clicks increased from 131 in December to 198 in September, and that Search Console recorded 1.03M search impressions across 10 complete calendar months. The page describes the work as ongoing technical SEO and service-focused content.
Agency's own wordsseoguruatlanta.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workDecember through September; 10 complete calendar monthsTechnical SEOQuote from the source page
Better new-domain visibility, backed by ongoing technical SEO and service-focused content, even as monthly demand fluctuated. New-domain search clicks 131 in December → 198 in September +51% Search impressions Across 10 complete calendar months 1.03M December through September, Search Console Total clicks 2,922
The case-study heading reports 119% more search clicks and 75% organic traffic growth in 8 months for a landscape design and build company.
Agency's own wordsseoguruatlanta.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 8 MonthsQuote from the source page
Strategic SEO Results: 119% More Search Clicks & 75% Organic Traffic Growth in 8 Months for a Landscape Design & Build Company
The case-study heading reports 939% organic traffic growth and 8,190 leads in 15 months for a full service landscaping company; it describes SEO and Google Ads results together.
Agency's own wordsseoguruatlanta.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 15 MonthsSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Strategic SEO & Google Ads Results: 939% Organic Traffic Growth & 8,190 Leads in 15 Months for a Full Service Landscaping Company
The campaign reported 298% growth in monthly organic sessions, from 229 in Jun 2021 to 912 in Sep 2026.
Agency's own wordsseoguruatlanta.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workJun 2021 to Sep 2026Quote from the source page
+298% Monthly Organic - Session Growth 229 in Jun 2021 → 912 in Sep 2026
The campaign recorded 178% growth in monthly Google Search clicks, from 222 in Jun 2021 to 617 in Sep 2026.
Agency's own wordsseoguruatlanta.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workJun 2021 to Sep 2026Quote from the source page
+178% Monthly GSC Click Growth 222 in Jun 2021 → 617 in Sep 2026
Across the campaign, Google Organic accounted for 156 of 190 tracked calls. Monthly calls attributed to Google Organic increased from two in March 2024 to 13 in October 2025.
Agency's own wordsseoguruatlanta.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMarch 2024 to October 2025Quote from the source page
Google Organic accounted for 156 of the 190 calls recorded across the 20 monthly reports. Monthly calls attributed to Google Organic increased from two in March 2024 to 13 in October 2025.
Positions in every ranking5 rankings
5 positions: 5 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #8 of 10 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Atlantaon its own published cases | #16 of 16 | 28 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #107 of 115 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #107 of 115 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #110 of 116 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Cumming, GA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Atlanta, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- local_business, enterprise, ecommerce, franchiseVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, Healthcare, Home Services, FranchiseVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- none namedIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Technical SEO $600 (1 of 10 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $1,300 (2 of 16 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 7 work claims7/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 7 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 7 confirmed, 0 partly, of 7 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 6 of 620/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 7 of 715/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names technical SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 7 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 7 of 7 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 7 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: At least three named clients (0 named)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.