Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #7 Technical SEO in Atlanta, of 10 · also in 40 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (ecommerce brands, saas companies, enterprises) and the industries on file (ecommerce, saas).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- 4 of 6 results with a number do not say what year they were measured.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a Technical SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #6 Social Cali36Ranks above on this question#6#7 this oneScore3635Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #8 SEO Guru Atlanta30Ranks below on this question#8#7 this oneScore3035Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Red Clay Commerce.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#7 Technical SEO in Atlanta: 35/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.6 | 64% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed8 of 8 on file · 0 of 8 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 8 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 8. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Ecommerce SEO 2 · Technical SEO 1 · Content-led SEO 1 · Local SEO 2 · Enterprise SEO 1 · B2B SaaS SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 1 · SEO for Marketplaces 1. The full ledger of 8 is on the proof page.
Red Clay Commerce reports that its work for LuxeLiving Home produced 510% organic revenue growth and 307% organic session growth in 14 months.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 14 monthsEcommerce SEOQuote from the source page
LuxeLiving Home 510% Revenue Growth in 14 Months 510% Organic Revenue Growth 307% Organic Session Growth
Red Clay Commerce developed an organic growth strategy for LuxeLiving Home, including technical SEO remediation, category-page content strategy, and digital PR. The case study reports 510% organic revenue growth in 14 months, along with 307% organic session growth and a 215% increase in orders.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work14 monthsTechnical SEOEcommerce SEOContent-led SEOQuote from the source page
LuxeLiving Home, a premium direct-to-consumer home goods brand, engaged Red Clay Commerce to architect a comprehensive organic growth strategy following a platform migration that caused a 40% traffic decline. 510% Organic Revenue Growth 307% Organic Session Growth 215% Increase in Orders 67 Premium Backlinks Earned 01 The Challenge Post-migration technical debt had gutted their organic rankings. Duplicate content, broken canonicals, and a flat information architecture were suppressing visibility across 3,200+ product pages. The brand was heavily reliant on paid media, with CAC increasing 60% YoY. 02 Our Solution We deployed a full-stack SEO program: technical remediation, category page content strategy, a topical authority cluster across home design, and a 6-month digital PR campaign targeting interior design and lifestyle publications. 03 Execution Month 1-2: Full technical audit and remediation of 847 critical issues. Month 3-4: Category page redesign and content optimization for 180 primary pages. Month 5-8: Content cluster publishing (120 articles). Month 9-14: Digital PR outreach securing 67 placements on DR 70+ domains. 04 Results 510% Organic Revenue Growth 307% Organic Session Growth 215% Increase in Orders 67 Premium Backlinks Earned
Red Clay Commerce reports that its work for CloudPeak Analytics produced a 649% increase in organic users and 379% growth in organic sessions.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
CloudPeak Analytics 649% User Growth. Zero Paid Budget. 649% Increase in Organic Users 379% Growth in Organic Sessions
Red Clay Commerce reports that its work for Meridian Financial Group produced 229% organic traffic growth and 318% growth in GMB views.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
Meridian Financial Group 229% Traffic. Enterprise-Scale Execution. 229% Organic Traffic Growth 318% Growth in GMB Views
Red Clay Commerce worked with Meridian Financial Group on an enterprise SEO program that included domain consolidation, technical SEO standardization, local SEO infrastructure for 18 regional offices, content governance and digital PR. The case study reports 229% organic traffic growth, 318% growth in GMB views, 200% growth in organic users, and 18 regional office SEO wins.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workLocal SEOEnterprise SEOQuote from the source page
A phased enterprise SEO roadmap: domain consolidation architecture, unified content governance framework, local SEO infrastructure for 18 regional offices, and a wealth management thought leadership PR program. 03 Execution Phase 1: Domain authority analysis and consolidation recommendations. Phase 2: Technical SEO standardization across all properties. Phase 3: Content governance rollout with editorial calendar for 4 content teams. Phase 4: Executive thought leadership placement in WSJ, Forbes, and Financial Times. 04 Results 229% Organic Traffic Growth 318% Growth in GMB Views 200% Growth in Organic Users 18 Regional Office SEO Wins
CloudPeak Analytics reported a 649% increase in organic users, 379% growth in organic sessions, 84x MQL growth from organic, and 295% growth in impressions.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
649% Increase in Organic Users 379% Growth in Organic Sessions 84x MQL Growth from Organic 295% Impressions Growth
Sarah Chen, CMO of Prism Analytics, says Red Clay Commerce's SaaS SEO program took the company from 3 MQLs per month from organic to 250.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workB2B SaaS SEOSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
"Red Clay Commerce took us from 3 MQLs per month from organic to 250. The sophistication of their SaaS SEO program is unlike anything we'd experienced from previous agencies." Sarah Chen CMO, Prism Analytics
Red Clay Commerce developed an SEO architecture for CloudPeak Analytics, including programmatic landing pages, a content cluster, and link building targeting SaaS review ecosystems.
Agency's own wordsredclaycommerce.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for MarketplacesQuote from the source page
A product-led SEO architecture: programmatic landing pages for 200+ integration and comparison terms, a TOFU/MOFU content cluster across data analytics, and an aggressive link building campaign targeting SaaS review ecosystems.
Positions in every ranking41 rankings
41 positions: 41 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #9 of 15 | 39 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #61 of 112 | 42 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #85 of 112 | 34 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #85 of 112 | 34 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #86 of 112 | 34 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
36 more positionsHide the other 36
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecommerce SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #84 of 112 | 34 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Ecommerce SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #84 of 112 | 34 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #7 of 10 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Atlantaon its own published cases | #15 of 16 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Dallason its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · New Yorkon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Phoenixon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Miamion its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #59 of 87 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #74 of 87 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #75 of 87 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #76 of 87 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #78 of 88 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #78 of 87 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #79 of 87 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #79 of 87 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #102 of 115 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #39 of 53 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Atlantaon its own published cases | #42 of 53 | 33 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Chicagoon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Houstonon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Seattleon its own published cases | #51 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Enterprise SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #52 of 54 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 24 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #58 of 87 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #74 of 87 | 27 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #79 of 87 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #80 of 88 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #103 of 115 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #104 of 116 | 26 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Atlanta, GA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Atlanta, GA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- ecommerce_brand, saas_company, enterpriseVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, SaaSVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- LuxeLiving Home, CloudPeak Analytics, Meridian Financial Group, Prism AnalyticsIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Technical SEO $600 (1 of 10 disclose) · Local SEO $799 (4 of 15 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $1,300 (2 of 16 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 88 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 53 disclose) · Enterprise SEO $5,000 (33 of 54 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 88 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Ecommerce SEO $3,750 (69 of 112 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 6 cases with a named client and a result, 8 work claims28/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 8 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 8 confirmed, 0 partly, of 8 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 6 of 620/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 8 of 815/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names technical SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 8 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 8 of 8 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (2 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 8 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.