Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #8 SEO for Lead Generation in Seattle, of 10
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses, local businesses) and the industries on file (real estate).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a SEO for Lead Generation case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #7 Actuate Media35Ranks above on this question#7#8 this oneScore3533Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #9 Seattle Digital Flow33Ranks below on this question#9#8 this oneScore3333Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Puget Sound Marketing Solutions.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#8 SEO for Lead Generation in Seattle: 33/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 11.3 | 75% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed4 of 4 on file · 0 of 4 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 4 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 4. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 2 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 4 is on the proof page.
After hiring Puget Sound Marketing Solutions, OnlyNet grew from an average of 16 life insurance leads per day to an average of 500 per day and reached approximately $150,000 in monthly revenue.
Agency's own wordspugetsoundmarketingsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
OnlyNet originally hired a marketing firm, which helped them gain only an average of 16 leads per day. After firing this firm, and hiring Puget Sound Marketing Solutions, the company grew to an average of 500 life insurance leads per day. OnlyNet is now generating approximately $150,000 in revenue per month, and is one of the largest life insurance lead generation services on the Internet today!
Puget Sound Marketing Solutions helped the Family Care Foundation launch a nationwide car donation program and provided additional SEO services. The page says the program became the foundation's primary source of income and that SEO helped capture corporate sponsors and donation-based revenue streams.
Agency's own wordspugetsoundmarketingsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The Family Care Foundation (FCF) is a non-profit organization providing relief services for people, and nations, in crisis. As a means to generate revenue, Puget Sound helped FCF launch a nation-wide Car Donation program. The program exploded into a successful revenue stream, becoming the primary source of income. Additional SEO services help to capture large corporate sponsors and donation-based revenue streams helping to fuel the incredible growth of this fascinating organization.
A client identified as a Private Investigator reported meeting a first paying client through the website and referred to the vendor’s website and SEO work, without specifying which work led to the result.
Agency's own wordspugetsoundmarketingsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
“Wanted to share my excitement!!! Met with my first “paying” client tonight from my website!!!!! I don’t really understand all the website and SEO stuff, but whatever you all are doing, please keep doing it!!! Thanks SO much for ALL of your help!!!!!”
A client identified as a Debt Relief Organization reported closing another deal and an 11% conversion ratio with the vendor’s PPC campaign. The reported result is tied to PPC, not SEO.
Agency's own wordspugetsoundmarketingsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
“We just closed another deal putting us at an unbelievable conversion ratio of 11% with your PPC campaign. That’s amazing man. And my hearts beating fast looking at the new site!!!! It looks so GOOD!!!”
Positions in every ranking1 ranking
1 position: 1 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 1 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Lead Generation · Seattleon its own published cases | #8 of 10 | 33 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Seattle, WA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Seattle, WA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_business, local_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Real EstateVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- OnlyNet, Private Investigator, Debt Relief OrganizationIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO for Lead Generation $750 (3 of 10 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 2 cases with a named client and a result, 4 work claims12/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 4 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 4 confirmed, 0 partly, of 4 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 2 of 220/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 4 of 415/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO for lead generation work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 4 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 4 of 4 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 4 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (2 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.