Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #14 Local SEO in New York, of 27 · also in 20 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/54 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 25% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 25% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise the agency's SEO expertise, listening skills, and ability to deliver tangible results such as increased traffic, leads, and rankings. No criticisms were mentioned across the reviews. The reviews are highly consistent in their positive assessment.More
- Expertise and knowledge5
- Long-term partnership3
- Listening and understanding2
- Education and guidance1
- Honesty and trust1
“his wealth of knowledge and experience”
Show 4 more quotesHide quotes
“Tim worked for us for nine years”
“Tim listens, synthesizes and focuses his talents”
“Tim has worked hard to educate me on digital marketing”
“The owner is very honest and smart”
No criticism in the 4 reviews read.
Show 2 more resultsHide results
- SEO7
- Website building1
- Small business owner
- Coffee shop
- Urgent care center
- Fitness studio
Show 3 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“After partnering with us, a popular Brooklyn coffee shop jumped from page three to the top three results for “coffee shops near me.” They saw a 40% rise in foot traffic along with fresh momentum, receiving positive reviews.”
“A local urgent care center struggled to appear in local search. After a comprehensive SEO overhaul, they now dominate the first page for several high-value keywords and receive double the calls from potential patients.”
“We helped this gym stand out in a busy market with localized content and optimized listings. Their membership inquiries rose by 60% within six months.”
- Your business matches the client types on file (small businesses, mid-market companies, local businesses) and the industries on file (real estate, legal, home services).
- You need what reviewers hired it for: SEO (7 of 8 mentions); Website building (1).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a Local SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #13 Splinternet Marketing50Ranks above on this question#13#14 this oneScore5048Independent00PriceFrom $242/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #15 Earn SEO48Ranks below on this question#15#14 this oneScore4848Independent00PriceFrom $200/monthnot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for NYC SEO Pro.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#14 Local SEO in New York: 48/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 16.3 | 54% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.9 | 64% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 15 | 100% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed6 of 6 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 6 claims on file: independent source 1 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 3 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Local SEO 4 · SEO Audit 2 · SEO for Lead Generation 1 · SEO for Marketplaces 1 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 1. The full ledger of 6 is on the proof page.
NYC SEO Pro performed a technical audit, local keyword optimization, and a Google Business Profile overhaul for Brooklyn Cafe, a neighborhood café in Brooklyn. The café saw a 300% increase in website traffic and doubled its walk-in customers within three months.
Agency's own wordsnycseopro.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workwithin three monthsLocal SEOSEO AuditQuote from the source page
After a technical audit, local keyword optimization, and Google Business Profile overhaul, the café saw a 300% increase in website traffic and doubled its walk-in customers within three months.
NYC SEO Pro helped a Queens fitness studio stand out with localized content and optimized listings, and membership inquiries rose by 60% within six months.
Agency's own wordsnycseopro.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workwithin six monthsSEO for Lead GenerationSEO for MarketplacesQuote from the source page
We helped this gym stand out in a busy market with localized content and optimized listings. Their membership inquiries rose by 60% within six months.
A neighborhood café in Brooklyn was struggling to appear in search results for “best coffee near me.” After a technical audit, local keyword optimization, and Google Business Profile overhaul, the café saw a 300% increase in website traffic and doubled its walk-in customers within three months.
Agency's own wordsnycseopro.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workwithin three monthsLocal SEOSEO AuditQuote from the source page
A neighborhood café in Brooklyn was struggling to appear in search results for “best coffee near me.” After a technical audit, local keyword optimization, and Google Business Profile overhaul, the café saw a 300% increase in website traffic and doubled its walk-in customers within three months.
A Brooklyn coffee shop moved from page three to the top three results for “coffee shops near me” after partnering with NYC SEO Pro, and saw a 40% rise in foot traffic plus positive reviews.
Agency's own wordsnycseopro.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
After partnering with us, a popular Brooklyn coffee shop jumped from page three to the top three results for “coffee shops near me.” They saw a 40% rise in foot traffic along with fresh momentum, receiving positive reviews.
A Manhattan urgent care center went from struggling to appear in local search to dominating the first page for several high-value keywords and receiving double the calls from potential patients after a comprehensive SEO overhaul.
Agency's own wordsnycseopro.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026describes workLocal SEOSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
A local urgent care center struggled to appear in local search. After a comprehensive SEO overhaul, they now dominate the first page for several high-value keywords and receive double the calls from potential patients.
NYC SEO Pro was founded in 2007 and has a team size ranging from 2 to 9 professionals.
Independent sourceselectedfirms.coverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026Quote from the source page
Founded 2007 Team Size 2 - 9
Positions in every ranking21 rankings
21 positions: 21 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · New Yorkon its own published cases | #14 of 27 | 48 | 4 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · New Yorkon its own published cases | #24 of 39 | 42 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Phoenixon its own published cases | #28 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Dallason its own published cases | #30 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Chicagoon its own published cases | #28 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
16 more positionsHide the other 16
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO Audit · Houstonon its own published cases | #28 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #28 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Seattleon its own published cases | #28 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Atlantaon its own published cases | #29 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Miamion its own published cases | #29 of 39 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · New Yorkon its own published cases | #35 of 53 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · New Yorkon its own published cases | #37 of 37 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · New Yorkon its own published cases | #41 of 41 | 32 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Phoenixon its own published cases | #42 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Dallason its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Miamion its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Atlantaon its own published cases | #43 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Chicagoon its own published cases | #43 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Houstonon its own published cases | #43 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #43 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Seattleon its own published cases | #43 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Chelsea, Manhattan, NY, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- New York, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- small_business, mid_market, local_business, ecommerceVendar profile field
- Industries
- Real Estate, Legal, Home ServicesVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Brooklyn Cafe, Queens Fitness Studio, Manhattan Urgent Care CenterIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
The Local SEO band tops out at $6,000/month; this vendor does not publish a monthly floor.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $2,500 (11 of 27 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $4,500 (20 of 37 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $4,500 (23 of 41 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 3 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims17/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 6 confirmed, 0 partly, of 6 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 4 of 420/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 6 of 615/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Only one third-party evidence claim is normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 6 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 1 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.