Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 21 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #45 AI search visibility in Chicago, of 51 · also in 43 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
Nothing on file says who this agency suits: no client types, industries or reviews to read it from.
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 21 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for an AI search visibility case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #44 Social Cali27Ranks above on this question#44#45 this oneScore2726Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #46 DFW Website SEO26Ranks below on this question#46#45 this oneScore2626Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Jordan Digital Marketing.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#45 AI search visibility in Chicago: 26/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 12 | 40% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 6.8 | 27% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.2 | 61% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed20 of 21 on file · 0 of 21 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 21 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 21. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 9 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: B2B SaaS SEO 2 · AI search visibility 2 · Technical SEO 1 · SEO Consulting 1 · SEO for Marketplaces 1 · Content-led SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 21 is on the proof page.
The B2B SaaS result reports a 275% increase in AI search citations month over month.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workmonth over monthB2B SaaS SEOAI search visibilityQuote from the source page
B2B SaaS 275% increase in AI search citations month over month
The HealthTech result reports 144% growth in sessions from AI YoY.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workYoYQuote from the source page
HealthTech 144% growth in sessions from AI YoY
A B2B SaaS case study reports a 275% increase in AI search citations month over month.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workmonth over monthB2B SaaS SEOAI search visibilityQuote from the source page
B2B SaaS 275% increase in AI search citations month over month
A Fintech case study reports a 50% increase in organic conversions year over year.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workYoYQuote from the source page
Fintech 50% increase in organic conversions YoY
Jordan Digital Marketing helped Tribe Dynamics shift organic search traffic from a small portion of site traffic to its largest source in 6 months, and helped the client better measure content's impact on its marketing funnel.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin just 6 monthsQuote from the source page
Jordan Digital Marketing helped us transform the way our marketing team creates and measures content. We went from organic search traffic making up only a small portion of our total site traffic to organic search comprising the largest source of website traffic in just 6 months! We're also now better able to measure and communicate the impact of content on our entire marketing funnel, which has been invaluable in planning and budgeting conversations.
Jordan Digital Marketing developed and launched a pillar-page strategy and increased non-brand blog production for Ocrolus. Six months after launch, the page reports increases in organic blog pageviews, non-brand traffic, organic conversions, and ranking keywords, as well as improved positions for three target keyword groups.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes work6 months after launching the pillar page strategy; results compared year over year and between the first and second halfQuote from the source page
Just 6 months after launching our pillar page strategy and significantly ramping up our non-brand targeted blog production in the 2nd half of the year, we've seen the following results for Ocrolus: 153% increase in organic unique pageviews to the blog year over year 31% increase in non-brand traffic in the second half of the year compared to the first half 44 new organic conversions from blog pages and pillar pages 79% growth in total organic ranking keywords year over year Highest non-brand traffic months since campaign launch Improved average position for multiple pillar page target keyword groups including: Intelligent document processing (improved from 40 to 6) Loan fraud detection (improved from 29 to 5) Business process automation BPA (improved from no rank to 21)
Jordan Digital Marketing provided SEO consulting to FactoryFix, including guidance on its Google for Jobs strategy and structured data markup for job listings. The testimonial reports a 4x increase in indexing and organic reach.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workTechnical SEOSEO ConsultingSEO for MarketplacesQuote from the source page
I highly recommend Jordan Digital Marketing for their exceptional SEO consulting services. They were instrumental in bringing clarity to our Google for Jobs strategy, improving our jobs ontology, and helping us achieve a remarkable 4x increase in indexing and organic reach. Jordan Digital Marketing quickly grasped the intricacies of Google for Jobs and provided invaluable insights. They optimized our job listings with structured data markup, improving visibility in search results, and enhancing our job categories and tags for a better user experience. Their expertise resulted in a significant 4x increase in organic reach, attracting more relevant job seekers and boosting conversion rates.
Jordan Digital Marketing's SEO team provided content strategy and execution for Valor Performance and helped double traffic year over year. The testimonial also says the team doubled content output.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workyear over yearContent-led SEOQuote from the source page
JDM's SEO team helped us double traffic year over year with top-notch content strategy and execution. They helped us maximize limited resources to double our content output and very quickly learned the ins and outs (and nuances) of our vertical.
Jordan Digital Marketing optimized Vehicle Ads campaigns for TrueCar. Within the first 3 months of these changes, monthly average traffic increased by 11%, leads increased by 4%, cost per lead decreased by 12%, and total sales increased by 9%; total ad spend decreased by 8%.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workWithin the first 3 months of these changes, when compared to the previous 3 monthsSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Within the first 3 months of these changes, when compared to the previous 3 months, we: Increased monthly average traffic to the site by 11% Decreased monthly average cost per click by 21% Increased leads by 4% Decreased cost per lead by 12% Decreased total ad spend by 8% Increased total sales by 9%
Jordan Digital Marketing worked with Sentry on paid media initiatives. Year over year, overall install volume increased by 94% and overall cost per install decreased by 27%.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workyear over yearQuote from the source page
Overall Install volume increased by 94% Overall Cost Per Install decreased by 27%
For Sentry, non-brand search install volume increased by 22% and non-brand search cost per install decreased by 5% year over year.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workyear over yearQuote from the source page
Non-brand search Install volume increased by 22% Non-brand search Cost Per Install decreased by 5%
For Sentry, display install volume increased by 580% and display cost per install decreased by 74% year over year.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workyear over yearQuote from the source page
Display Install volume increased by 580% Display Cost Per Install decreased by 74%
For Sentry, video install volume increased by 270% and video cost per install decreased by 46% year over year.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workyear over yearQuote from the source page
Video Install volume increased by 270% Video Cost Per Install decreased by 46%
Jordan Digital Marketing helped Sleep Reset increase lead volume by 267% and reduce CAC by 67% in 8 months through acquisition strategy and execution. The testimonial does not attribute these results to a specific channel.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin 8 monthsQuote from the source page
Through their guidance and execution, we increased lead volume by 267% while reducing CAC by 67% in 8 months.
Jordan Digital Marketing helped Pilot SEM scale ARR by 3x while maintaining efficiency goals. The testimonial does not give a result period.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes worksince we first startedQuote from the source page
As a result, we’ve scaled Pilot SEM’s ARR by 3x since we first started, while maintaining our efficiency goals.
Jordan Digital Marketing’s management for Nimble exceeded its SQL goal by 44% in the first full month. Nimble achieved a 2x increase in SQL conversion rate, a 4x increase in total SQL volume, and a 38% decrease in cost per SQL compared with the last month under its previous agency.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin the first full month of our managementQuote from the source page
Our efforts did more than meet our client’s SQL goal in the first full month of our management; they exceeded the goal by 44%. Comparing the results in the first month under JDM’s management to the last month under the previous agency’s management, Nimble achieved: 2x increase in SQL conversion rate 4x increase in total SQL volume 38% decrease in cost per SQL
Jordan Digital Marketing integrated AppsFlyer data with FloatMe's Facebook campaigns, and Cost Per New User improved 14% from June to July.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workJune to JulyQuote from the source page
After setting up the AppsFlyer integration with Facebook in July, we saw Cost Per New User improve 14% from June to July.
Jordan Digital Marketing increased creative testing in FloatMe's Facebook campaigns, and Cost Per New User improved 16% from August to September.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workAugust to SeptemberQuote from the source page
In August, we increased the frequency of new creative tests within the platform, which contributed to Cost Per New User improving 16% from August to September.
Jordan Digital Marketing combined AppsFlyer data integration and creative testing for FloatMe's Facebook campaigns; Cost Per New User decreased 33% from July to October.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workJuly to OctoberQuote from the source page
The combined initiatives of data integration and creative testing led to a Cost Per New User decrease of 33% from July to October.
Jordan Digital Marketing re-configured the AppsFlyer integration with Google for FloatMe and scaled spend 54% from June to November while keeping Cost Per New User below FloatMe's goal.
Agency's own wordsjordandigitalmarketing.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workJune to NovemberQuote from the source page
After re-configuring the AppsFlyer integration with Google in July, we were able to scale spend by 54% from June to November while maintaining Cost Per New User below FloatMe’s goal.
Positions in every ranking44 rankings
44 positions: 44 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI search visibility · Chicagoon its own published cases | #45 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · New Yorkon its own published cases | #45 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Dallason its own published cases | #47 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #71 of 87 | 28 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #73 of 87 | 28 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
39 more positionsHide the other 39
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #74 of 87 | 28 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #75 of 87 | 28 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #36 of 51 | 35 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Atlantaon its own published cases | #45 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Houstonon its own published cases | #45 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Miamion its own published cases | #45 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Phoenixon its own published cases | #46 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Seattleon its own published cases | #46 of 51 | 26 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #53 of 88 | 36 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #72 of 87 | 28 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #50 of 50 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Dallason its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · New Yorkon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Phoenixon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Miamion its own published cases | #53 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #71 of 88 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Chicagoon its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #111 of 115 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #13 of 15 | 31 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Atlantaon its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Chicagoon its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Dallason its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Houstonon its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Los Angeleson its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Miamion its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · New Yorkon its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Phoenixon its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Consulting · Seattleon its own published cases | #15 of 15 | 22 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #42 of 53 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Atlantaon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Chicagoon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Houstonon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Seattleon its own published cases | #52 of 53 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Content-led SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #85 of 87 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #92 of 116 | 30 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #111 of 115 | 21 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- San Francisco, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Tribe Dynamics, TrueCar, Ocrolus, Sentry, Sleep Reset, Pilot, Nimble, FloatMeIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $2,600 (34 of 50 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 88 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · SEO Consulting $3,250 (7 of 15 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 88 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Content-led SEO $3,500 (51 of 87 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 16 cases with a named client and a result, 21 work claims30/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 21 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 21 confirmed, 0 partly, of 21 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 18 of 1820/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 21 of 2115/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names AI search visibility work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 21 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 21 of 21 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 21 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.