Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #9 Technical SEO in Dallas, of 10 · also in 21 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (B2B companies, local businesses) and the industries on file (home services, dental).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #8 Razor Rank32Ranks above on this question#8#9 this oneScore3230Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #10 Digital Media Ninja28Ranks below on this question#10#9 this oneScore2830Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for NIXAR Solutions.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#9 Technical SEO in Dallas: 30/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 9 | 30% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 12.4 | 50% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.9 | 73% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 2.4 | 24% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed10 of 10 on file · 0 of 10 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 10 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 10. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 5 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: Technical SEO 2 · AI search visibility 6 · SEO Audit 2. The full ledger of 10 is on the proof page.
NIXAR rebuilt SYB Builders' website on Next.js in March 2026, adding 8 location pages and redirecting 23 old Wix addresses. Its work also included structured data and an llms.txt file.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMarch to September 2026Technical SEOAI search visibilityQuote from the source page
March 2026: rebuilt the site from scratch on Next.js, with service pages, project case studies, estimate forms, a blog and 8 location pages. Every one of the 23 old Wix addresses redirects to its new page, so nothing that already ranked was lost. March to September 2026: 90 blog articles live, 36 of them on launch day. September 2026: fixed a canonical tag defect, wrote 57 meta descriptions, added breadcrumb markup to 108 pages, and added Longview, Mineola, Lindale and design-build pages. Structured data and an llms.txt file, so Google and AI assistants read who SYB is and where it works.
NIXAR launched a Next.js website for Tire Geeks, conducted an SEO audit, and fixed schema and opening-hours information. The page says the financing offer and tire finder were on the first screen when the site launched.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMarch to August 2026SEO AuditQuote from the source page
March 2026: finished and launched the Next.js website, with the financing offer and the tire finder on the first screen. April 2026: an SEO audit, then schema fixes that mark the business up as a tire shop. June 2026: corrected the opening hours across 22 files of the site. By August 2026: neighborhood pages, a team page with author bylines, blog posts, and tire-size, wheel-size and fitment pages.
NIXAR provided Fluyenta with marketing strategy and a website audit, built a manufacturing landing page, and added FAQ markup and an llms.txt file. A testimonial from Fluyenta's director of user experience describes NIXAR's support as contributing to the company's growth and innovation.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workJuly to August 2026AI search visibilitySEO AuditQuote from the source page
July 2026: the marketing strategy and a website audit, then the pivot to selling solutions by vertical instead of the platform. August 2026: the first vertical landing page, manufacturing, built from scratch with FAQ markup and an llms.txt for the AI tools. “ Working with NIXAR has been a game changer for RunMyProcess. Their creativity, strategic approach and hands on support has been invaluable to our growth and innovation. ” Sebastian Ardilla, Director of User Experience, RunMyProcess
NIXAR Solutions built a website for SYB Builders and provided SEO and AI search services for the commercial contractor.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workAI search visibilityQuote from the source page
Live, a site we built SYB Builders Website, SEO and AI search for a commercial contractor.
NIXAR says it installed business code and an llms.txt file for SYB Builders. The page does not state a measured result from this work.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workAI search visibilityQuote from the source page
For SYB Builders, we installed the business code you saw in chapter 4 and an llms.txt file for AI tools to read: the kind of fixes this audit finds.
SYB Builders' owner said NIXAR transformed the website and online presence, helped the company look more professional, and worked with the team toward its desired result.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Completely transformed our website and online presence and helped us look so much more professional. They worked with us every step of the way to make sure it came out to my team and I's desired result. Couldn't be more happy!
NIXAR Solutions rebuilt a website for SYB Builders, a commercial contractor, and did SEO and AI search work. The work is dated March 2026; the page states no result.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workMarch 2026AI search visibilityQuote from the source page
SYB Builders : SEO and AI search work for a commercial contractor, on a website we rebuilt in March 2026.
NIXAR worked on SEO for Salons of Dallas Suites, addressing indexing and internal linking issues and replacing manually written review blocks with the business's live Google reviews. The page says these fixes are live but reports no traffic or ranking result.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSeptember 2026Technical SEOQuote from the source page
September 2026: replaced the hand-written review blocks with the live Google reviews of the business, exactly as Google shows them. September 2026: a canonical tag on every page, the old addresses redirected to their new pages, and every profile and service linked from the directory, A to Z, so Google can reach all of them. What changed The fixes are live on salonsofdallas.com: the pages Google was leaving out are linked and have a canonical tag, and the reviews come straight from Google.
NIXAR developed an SEO and AI search plan and conducted an AI search visibility audit for ABC Early Learning Academy, then added a pricing page and license facts to the website. The page says the tuition information and license number were available on the site, but gives no resulting traffic or lead figures.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workOctober 2026AI search visibilityQuote from the source page
An SEO and AI search plan for the site, and an AI search visibility audit: who Google and the assistants name for daycare in Ennis, and why. October 2026: a pricing page with tuition and supply fees by age, the navigation grouped so every program is one tap away, and the state license facts on the site, where a parent and a search engine can both read them. The tuition sheet as a post, so the same answer is on Instagram and Facebook. Ads for Instagram and Facebook: the hours, the meals, the school run, infant care and scholarship help, one of them in Spanish. What changed Tuition by age has its own page now, at abcearlyacademy.com/pricing, and the license number is in the site's structured data, where Google and the AI assistants read it.
Rick Lokken, Owner of SYB Builders, says NIXAR transformed the company’s website and online presence and helped it achieve the desired result.
Agency's own wordsnixarsolutions.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
“ Completely transformed our website and online presence and helped us look so much more professional. They worked with us every step of the way to make sure it came out to my team and I's desired result. Couldn't be more happy! ”
Positions in every ranking22 rankings
22 positions: 22 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI search visibility · Dallason its own published cases | #23 of 51 | 44 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · New Yorkon its own published cases | #33 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Chicagoon its own published cases | #34 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Atlantaon its own published cases | #32 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Houstonon its own published cases | #32 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
17 more positionsHide the other 17
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI search visibility · Phoenixon its own published cases | #32 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Seattleon its own published cases | #32 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #33 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| AI search visibility · Miamion its own published cases | #34 of 51 | 38 | 6 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #9 of 10 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Dallason its own published cases | #31 of 39 | 35 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · New Yorkon its own published cases | #34 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Phoenixon its own published cases | #35 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #106 of 115 | 24 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Atlantaon its own published cases | #33 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Chicagoon its own published cases | #33 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Houstonon its own published cases | #33 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Miamion its own published cases | #33 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #33 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO Audit · Seattleon its own published cases | #33 of 39 | 30 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #106 of 115 | 24 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| Technical SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #109 of 116 | 24 | 2 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Frisco, TX, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Dallas, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- b2b, local_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Home Services, DentalVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- SYB Builders, Tire Geeks, Fluyenta, Salons of Dallas Suites, ABC Early Learning AcademyIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Technical SEO $1,625 (2 of 10 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · SEO Audit $3,000 (25 of 39 disclose) · AI search visibility $4,500 (28 of 51 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 115 disclose) · Technical SEO $3,000 (72 of 116 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- 2024Agency's own words
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: team size, logo14/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, setup fee3/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 3 cases with a named client and a result, 10 work claims22/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 10 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 10 confirmed, 0 partly, of 10 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 10 of 1015/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names technical SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 10 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 10 of 10 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 10 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.