Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 11 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #6 B2B SaaS SEO in Miami, of 12 · also in 10 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (B2B companies, B2C brands) and the industries on file (real estate, legal, b2b).
- You need the setup fee in writing before you commit: it is not published.
Starting price is below the median of ranked agencies for this question.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 11 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Few outside reviews mention B2B SaaS SEO work specifically.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for a B2B SaaS SEO case close to your business, with the result and the year it was measured.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- #5 Raging Agency47Ranks above on this question#5#6 this oneScore4745Independent00Pricenot disclosedFrom $799 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #7 Optimum745Ranks below on this question#7#6 this oneScore4545Independent00PriceFrom $4,000/monthFrom $799 per month, retainerModerate confidence · own published cases
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for 1GS Digital Agency.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#6 B2B SaaS SEO in Miami: 45/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 25 | 100% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 9.1 | 61% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 5 | 50% |
|
| Reputationweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed11 of 11 on file · 0 of 11 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 11 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 11. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 7 · B2B SaaS SEO 1 · SEO for High-Ticket Services 1. The full ledger of 11 is on the proof page.
The page reports that a Montessori school generated 50+ leads monthly, leading to 150 enrollments in less than 12 months. The client is not named.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workin less than 12 monthsSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Montessori school generates 50+ leads monthly leading to 150 Enrollments in less than 12 months!
The page reports an inbound lead generation system generating 15+ qualified leads monthly for a personal injury attorney. The attorney is not named.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workmonthlyB2B SaaS SEOSEO for Lead GenerationSEO for High-Ticket ServicesQuote from the source page
Inbound Lead Generation System generating 15+ Qualified leads monthly for Personal Injury Attorney
The page reports 31 B2B leads in 60 days for an employee benefits company. It does not state the service used.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workIn 60 DaysSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
31 B2B Leads in 60 Days for Employee Benefits Company
Philip Milam says 1GS upgraded the website, advanced the company's social media presence, and generated quality leads.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
1GS Digital Agency has done a wonderful job upgrading our website. They are taking our social media presence to the next level and getting us quality leads. Claudia and the team are always responsive and friendly. Quality work, professional, and a good value for your buck!
1GS Digital Agency upgraded Philip Milam's website and worked on its social media presence; Milam said the work was getting them quality leads.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
1GS Digital Agency has done a wonderful job upgrading our website. They are taking our social media presence to the next level and getting us quality leads. Claudia and the team are always responsive and friendly. Quality work, professional, and a good value for your buck!
1GS Digital Agency upgraded Philip Milam's website and worked on its social media presence; Milam says the agency was getting them quality leads.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
1GS Digital Agency has done a wonderful job upgrading our website. They are taking our social media presence to the next level and getting us quality leads.
1GS Digital Agency upgraded Philip Milam's website and worked on its social media presence; Milam says it was getting quality leads.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
1GS Digital Agency has done a wonderful job upgrading our website. They are taking our social media presence to the next level and getting us quality leads. Claudia and the team are always responsive and friendly. Quality work, professional, and a good value for your buck!
Kate Potterfield says 1GS provided digital marketing capacity and expertise for work her team could not do in-house.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
1GS helped us bring capacity that we didn't have internally. Capacity for the a lot of the digital marketing work that we're unable to do in-house. A lot of really great expertise.
Michael Grossman says the process was refined and that they obtained new business sooner than he expected.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
We refined the process and found success and we were able to get new business sooner than I expected.
Erin Renslow says the content from 1GS is outstanding and describes the relationship as a partnership.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
The professionalism of 1GS is fantastic, the content we get from 1GS is outstanding. A great partnership right from the beginning.
David Hicks says the team helped with marketing and lead follow-up, and describes the service as outsourcing a CMO and marketing team.
Agency's own words1gslab.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
It's like outsourcing a CMO and the entire marketing team to help you follow up with leads! We love his attention and ability to teach.
Positions in every ranking11 rankings
11 positions: 9 where a claim on file names the need, 2 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Lead Generation · Miamion its own published cases | #11 of 28 | 59 | 7 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #6 of 12 | 45 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for High-Ticket Services · Miamion its own published cases | #22 of 28 | 39 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Dallason its own published cases | #54 of 87 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Phoenixon its own published cases | #54 of 87 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
6 more positionsHide the other 6
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B SaaS SEO · Atlantaon its own published cases | #55 of 87 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Houstonon its own published cases | #56 of 87 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #53 of 87 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| B2B SaaS SEO · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #55 of 88 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget · Miamilisted on offer only: no claim on file names this need | #12 of 17 | 59 | 0 | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer · Miamilisted on offer only: no claim on file names this need | #13 of 19 | 59 | 0 | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Miami, FL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Miami, FL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- b2b, b2cVendar profile field
- Industries
- Real Estate, Legal, B2B, Higher Education, InsuranceVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Employee Benefits Company, Philip Milam, Kate Potterfield, Michael Grossman, Erin Renslow, David HicksIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullFrom $799 per month, retainer
- Model
- retainer
- Minimum monthly budget
- $799 per month
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 12 months
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Agency's own words. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: B2B SaaS SEO $2,000 (5 of 12 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $2,500 (15 of 28 disclose) · SEO Agencies within a $6,000 Monthly Budget $2,000 (17 of 17 disclose) · SEO Agencies on a Monthly Retainer $2,500 (16 of 19 disclose) · SEO for High-Ticket Services $2,750 (12 of 28 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 87 disclose) · B2B SaaS SEO $2,600 (49 of 88 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: hourly rate, setup fee13/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 1 cases with a named client and a result, 11 work claims14/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 11 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 11 confirmed, 0 partly, of 11 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 3 of 320/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 11 of 1115/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 11 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 11 of 11 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (1 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 11 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.