Miami / B2B SaaS SEO

Best B2B SaaS SEO Agencies in Miami (2026)

12 of 46 agencies are ranked on documented B2B SaaS SEO work; 1 confirmed by an independent source; payment does not affect the order.

Data as of November 3, 2026 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · How this ranking works ↓

Vendar ranks 12 of 46 SEO agencies serving Miami for B2B SaaS SEO: the ones with documented B2B SaaS SEO work on file, verified through September 2026. The top three by evidence-weighted score are Loona Agency (58/100), White Shark Media (57) and Organic Marketing Pros (48). No paid placements; every position below cites its sources. 34 Miami SEO agencies have no B2B SaaS SEO claim on file and are listed unranked.

The answer in three lines

Compare top 3
  1. 1Loona Agency 58 · From $2,000/month · clients 4.6/5 (12)9 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 9 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  2. 2White Shark Media 57 · From $3,500/month · clients 4.3/5 (232)2 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site
  3. 3Organic Marketing Pros 48 · price not disclosed5 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site

Budget in Miami: disclosed monthly floors run from $500 to $4,000, median $2,000; 5 of 12 disclose a price.

12 ranked agencies

BudgetSort
ForPays
1
Loona Agency logo

Loona Agency

Miami, FL, USA · team 21

HQ in Miami · From $2,000/month · clients 4.6/5 (12) Agency's own published cases

Dennis, Co-founder of SaaS startup Ringblaze, says Loona built comparison pages, product-led blog content, and a technical SEO overhaul that fixed… (Agency's own words, loona.agency)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

58/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
2
White Shark Media logo

White Shark Media

Miami, FL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2011

HQ in Miami · From $3,500/month · clients 4.3/5 (232) Agency's own published cases

…In 3 months, qualified leads grew from 22 to 54 per month (+145%), monthly revenue grew from $77K to $189K, ROAS grew from 18.9x to 39x, and cost per lead fell from $185 to $90 (-38%)… (Agency's own words, whitesharkmedia.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

57/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
3
Organic Marketing Pros logo

Organic Marketing Pros

Miami, USA · team 25+

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed Agency's own published cases

…comparison keywords, and launched 200+ programmatic integration pages, growing organic from less than 8% of pipeline. (Agency's own words, organicmarketingpros.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

48/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
4
Netrocket logo

Netrocket

Miami, FL, USA · team 10-49

HQ in Miami · From $500/month · clients 3.0/5 (2) 1 documented

A collaboration software company hired Netrocket for SEO services, with tasks including keyword research, content strategy development, website… (Independent source, othlist.com)

48/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
5
Raging Agency logo

Raging Agency

Miami, FL, USA · since 2021

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (147) Agency's own published cases

…Within weeks, they saw a dramatic increase in qualified leads, improved show rates, and multi-seven-figure sales. (Agency's own words, ragingagency.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

47/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
61D

1GS Digital Agency

Miami, FL, USA

HQ in Miami · From $799/month Agency's own published cases

The page reports an inbound lead generation system generating 15+ qualified leads monthly for a personal injury attorney. The attorney is not named. (Agency's own words, 1gslab.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

45/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
7
Optimum7 logo

Optimum7

Coral Gables, FL, USA · team 10-49 · since 2007

serves Miami from Coral Gables · From $4,000/month Agency's own published cases

…the digital foundation for a B2B payroll compliance software company, with monthly visitors rising from 140 to 2,250. (Agency's own words, optimum7.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

45/100
Moderate confidence
Verified · Sources checked Sep 2026
View profile
8
Jives Media logo

Jives Media

California, USA · since 2012

serves Miami from California · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (191) Agency's own published cases

…digital presence and delivered a 300% increase in qualified leads. (Agency's own words, jivesmedia.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

44/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
9
Unified Marketing logo

Unified Marketing

Deerfield Beach, FL, USA · since 2006

serves Miami from Deerfield Beach · pricing not disclosed · clients 5.0/5 (17) Agency's own published cases

…to a paid, waivered, licensed hunting party and lists 9 pipeline stages and 1 personal link per hunter. (Agency's own words, unifiedmktg.com)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

41/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
10
HQDM logo

HQDM

Miami, FL, USA · team 04 · since 2019

HQ in Miami · pricing not disclosed · clients 4.7/5 (75) Agency's own published cases

Client Jennifer Osgood of designpickle.com reports results within 3 months, with big increases in qualified leads coming through organic. (Agency's own words, hqdm.io)

No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

40/100
Moderate confidence
Not verified
View profile
34 more agencies serve Miami, but without externally confirmed B2B SaaS SEO work
Frequently asked questions (6)
How many Miami SEO agencies have documented B2B SaaS SEO work?
12 of the 46 SEO agencies Vendar tracks in Miami have at least one B2B SaaS SEO claim on file under the published rubric; 1 of the 12 ranked has an outside source naming it, and 1 has one that describes the work rather than listing the service. The other 34 Miami agencies are listed unranked until evidence is added.
Which Miami B2B SaaS SEO agency fits my type of business?
By the clients named in their documented B2B SaaS SEO work: Law firms: 1GS Digital Agency (#6) and KAFURE Consulting Services (#11); Dental, medical and wellness: Raging Agency (#5); Home and trade services: Dharma Digital Marketing Agency (#12). This comes from client reviews and case studies on file, not from the agencies' own positioning; the number after each name is its place in the ranking.
What does B2B SaaS SEO cost in Miami?
Among the ranked agencies that disclose a monthly floor, retainers start at $500/month and the median floor is $2,000/month. 5 of 12 ranked agencies disclose some pricing signal.
Which of them are verified?
4 of 12 ranked agencies are verified. Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified. The lowest disclosed floor among verified agencies is Netrocket at $500/month.
How is this list different from the Miami SEO page?
The Miami SEO page ranks every SEO agency serving the city. This page keeps only the agencies with B2B SaaS SEO evidence on file, scores them on the B2B SaaS SEO query with the published model, and cites the claims behind every position. The model, its weights and the rubric are on the How we rank page.
When was this list updated?
The newest profile verification among ranked agencies is September 13, 2026; the newest evidence claim was checked on November 3, 2026. Scores are recomputed from the profiles whenever a profile changes; the ranking model is version 2026.11.7.
All detailsThe full table, the rubric, the rules and the limits: the same data the machine feed serves for this ranking.Open ↓
D1Full ranking table12 ranked · click a column to sort
#AgencyScoreEvid./30Fit/25Capab./15Reliab./10Transp./10Reput./5Cred./5Pen.Conf.ClaimsVerified
1Loona Agency5817250.83102.600.89/0Sep 13, 2026
2White Shark Media571223.50.27.2104.300.82/0Sep 13, 2026
3Organic Marketing Pros48171911.132.500-50.85/0Not verified
4Netrocket481023.50.93100.700.81/1Sep 13, 2026
5Raging Agency471415.510.54.2050-20.83/0Not verified
61GS Digital Agency458259.13500-50.81/0Not verified
7Optimum745620.40.17.21001.30.81/0Sep 13, 2026
8Jives Media441212.497.2050-20.82/0Not verified
9Unified Marketing411212.48.57.203.10-20.82/0Not verified
10HQDM40615.58.25.42.54.40-20.81/0Not verified
11KAFURE Consulting Services3912199.53000-50.82/0Not verified
12Dharma Digital Marketing Agency28812.49.23000-50.81/0Not verified

Pool 46 · ranked 12 · unranked 34 (0 with profile tags only) · verified 4 · pricing disclosed 5 · case studies on file 52 · an outside source names the work 1 · an outside document describes it 1 · lowest verified floor Netrocket $500/month

Claims: claims for this need in the feed / of them from a third party. Confidence is the number behind the High, Moderate and Lower labels; it never changes the order.

D1Breakdown per agencyPoints, facts, claims with weights and reviews behind every position
#1 Loona Agency58/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · From $2,000/month · projects from $2,000 · 325 claims on file

Evidence for this query17/300.56600000000000019 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 9 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Dennis, Co-founder of SaaS startup Ringblaze, says Loona built comparison pages, product-led blog content, and a technical SEO overhaul… (loona.agency, claimed); Loona presents a selection of marketing agency case studies documenting projects and results, including Plum Proexteriors with Revenue of… (loona.agency, claimed)
Fit to this query25/251Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Retainers from $2,000/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names startup clients
Capability depth0.8/150.0533 of 82 listed services are SEO services; 9 of 325 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $2,000/month); Team size 21; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation2.6/50.51212 third-party reviews at 4.6
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

  • Dennis, Co-founder of SaaS startup Ringblaze, says Loona built comparison pages, product-led blog content, and a technical SEO overhaul that fixed indexing issues; within 6 months organic traffic accounted for 40% of the sign-up pipeline, up from under 10%.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Loona presents a selection of marketing agency case studies documenting projects and results, including Plum Proexteriors with Revenue of $683K and MQLs of +77%.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Loona presents case studies documenting a selection of projects and their results, including work for Plum Proexteriors with revenue of $683K and MQLs of +77%.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Loona Agency lists a case study for Plum Proexteriors, an exterior remodeling and construction firm in Massachusetts, USA, with results shown as revenue of $683K and MQLs up 77%.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Loona Agency lists a case study for American Building Development, an exterior remodeling company in Northern California, USA, with results shown as revenue of $585K and a pipeline of $3.76M.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Loona Agency lists a case study for LOOPO, a B2B SaaS startup in California, USA, showing 1.28M search impressions. The result is presented on the SMM services page, so it is not clearly attributable to social media work alone.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Loona Agency's portfolio lists a case study for LOOPO, a B2B SaaS startup in California, USA, with 1.28M search impressions.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Barnaby, Co-Founder and CEO of Avva Experience, says Loona built a content marketing strategy around high-intent keywords and optimized service pages for local search in the UK and US; within 6 months organic search became the company's second-largest lead source and inbound demo requests increased by 150%.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • Loona Agency lists a case study for LOOPO, a B2B SaaS startup in California, showing 1.28M search impressions.

    Agency's own words · loona.agency · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 7 reviews; Trustpilot 4.1 from 5 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): SERM, ORM, Community Marketing, Link Building

#2 White Shark Media57/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · From $3,500/month · projects from $3,500 · 370 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; White Shark Media ran a paid search campaign for home restoration company Renew Core, splitting campaigns by service type, adding… (whitesharkmedia.com, claimed); White Shark Media's case study names client Renew Core, a home restoration company, and reports a paid search campaign restructuring over… (whitesharkmedia.com, claimed)
Fit to this query23.5/250.94Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Retainers from $3,500/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Best-fit note mentions Local SEO
Capability depth0.2/150.0111 of 117 listed services are SEO services; 2 of 370 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2011; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $3,500/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation4.3/50.86232 third-party reviews at 4.3
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

  • White Shark Media ran a paid search campaign for home restoration company Renew Core, splitting campaigns by service type, adding emergency keywords, blocking irrelevant searches, and improving the ads. In 3 months, qualified leads grew from 22 to 54 per month (+145%), monthly revenue grew from $77K to $189K, ROAS grew from 18.9x to 39x, and cost per lead fell from $185 to $90 (-38%).

    Agency's own words · whitesharkmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • White Shark Media's case study names client Renew Core, a home restoration company, and reports a paid search campaign restructuring over 3 months that grew qualified leads from 22 to 54 per month (+145%), monthly revenue from $77K to $189K (ROAS from 18.9x to 39x), and cost per lead from $185 to $90 (-38%).

    Agency's own words · whitesharkmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.2 from 184 reviews; Trustpilot 4.8 from 48 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): SERM, ORM, Community Marketing, Link Building

#3 Organic Marketing Pros48/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 26 claims on file

Evidence for this query17/300.56700000000000015 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 5 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; For Meridian SaaS Solutions, the vendor resolved 340+ technical issues, rebuilt content strategy around high-intent comparison keywords… (organicmarketingpros.com, claimed); For Meridian SaaS Solutions, the vendor addressed a baseline of less than 8% of pipeline from organic search by resolving 340+ technical… (organicmarketingpros.com, claimed)
Fit to this query19/250.76Headquartered in Miami (Miami, USA); Pricing not disclosed; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth11.1/150.741 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 5 of 26 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 25+; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: No independent source on file -3 (Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.); Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • For Meridian SaaS Solutions, the vendor resolved 340+ technical issues, rebuilt content strategy around high-intent comparison keywords, and launched 200+ programmatic integration pages, growing organic from less than 8% of pipeline.

    Agency's own words · organicmarketingpros.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • For Meridian SaaS Solutions, the vendor addressed a baseline of less than 8% of pipeline from organic search by resolving 340+ technical issues, rebuilding content strategy around high-intent comparison keywords, and launching 200+ programmatic integration pages.

    Agency's own words · organicmarketingpros.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.9 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • In a case study, Organic Marketing Pros worked with Meridian SaaS Solutions on SEO, resolving 340+ technical issues, rebuilding content strategy around high-intent comparison keywords, and launching 200+ programmatic integration pages. The result was +285% organic traffic and +170% marketing-qualified leads from search. The page does not state when this happened.

    Agency's own words · organicmarketingpros.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • For client Pelobridge Financial, Organic Marketing Pros built a content strategy with 12 topic clusters, produced 8 pillar pages and 96 supporting articles over 12 months, and optimized content for featured snippets and AI citation. The client went from under 5,000 monthly organic visitors to results including 2,400+ MQLs generated from content; the page also cites +35,200 organic traffic growth. Because the engagement combined content strategy, production, internal linking, and AI citation optimization, the result is not attributable to one service alone.

    Agency's own words · organicmarketingpros.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • For Pelobridge Financial, the vendor built a complete content strategy around 12 topic clusters and produced 8 pillar pages and 96 supporting articles over 12 months. This resulted in 35,200 organic traffic growth and 2,400+ MQLs generated from content.

    Agency's own words · organicmarketingpros.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

#4 Netrocket48/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Confirmed by an independent source · headquarters in the city · From $500/month · projects from $3,000 · 264 claims on file

Evidence for this query10/300.3331 B2B SaaS SEO claim on file: 1 third-party, 0 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; A collaboration software company hired Netrocket for SEO services, with tasks including keyword research, content strategy development… (othlist.com, verified)
Fit to this query23.5/250.94Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Retainers from $500/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Best-fit note mentions Local SEO
Capability depth0.9/150.05710 of 96 listed services are SEO services; 1 of 264 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $500/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation0.7/50.1432 third-party reviews at 3.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file
  • A collaboration software company hired Netrocket for SEO services, with tasks including keyword research, content strategy development, website restructuring, and internal linking.

    Independent source · othlist.com · verified: Checked against the source page by Vendar. · weight 1 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Trustpilot 3 from 2 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): SERM, ORM, Community Marketing, Link Building

#5 Raging Agency47/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 19 claims on file

Evidence for this query14/300.4673 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 3 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Void Space Technologies, creators of the Quantum Energy Wellness Bed (MSRP: $34,000 to $40,000), partnered with Raging Agency to overhaul… (ragingagency.com, claimed); Raging Agency's case study reports 379+ qualified leads and multi-seven-figure sales for Void Space Technologies' high-ticket wellness… (ragingagency.com, claimed)
Fit to this query15.5/250.62Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth10.5/150.69700000000000011 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 3 of 19 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability4.2/100.42In business since 2021; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation5/51147 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Void Space Technologies, creators of the Quantum Energy Wellness Bed (MSRP: $34,000 to $40,000), partnered with Raging Agency to overhaul their lead generation and sales process. Within weeks, they saw a dramatic increase in qualified leads, improved show rates, and multi-seven-figure sales.

    Agency's own words · ragingagency.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Raging Agency's case study reports 379+ qualified leads and multi-seven-figure sales for Void Space Technologies' high-ticket wellness hardware.

    Agency's own words · ragingagency.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Raging Agency generated 379+ qualified leads for Void Space Technologies.

    Agency's own words · ragingagency.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 137 reviews; Trustpilot 4.4 from 10 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#6 1GS Digital Agency45/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · From $799/month · 12 claims on file

Evidence for this query8/300.2671 B2B SaaS SEO claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; The page reports an inbound lead generation system generating 15+ qualified leads monthly for a personal injury attorney. The attorney is… (1gslab.com, claimed)
Fit to this query25/251Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Retainers from $799/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Profile names b2b clients
Capability depth9.1/150.6041 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 1 of 12 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability3/100.3Founding year not disclosed; Retention not documented
Transparency5/100.5Pricing disclosed (From $799/month); Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: No independent source on file -3 (Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.); Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Never verified against official sources.; No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • The page reports an inbound lead generation system generating 15+ qualified leads monthly for a personal injury attorney. The attorney is not named.

    Agency's own words · 1gslab.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 3, 2026

#7 Optimum745/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · serves the city from Coral Gables, FL, USA · From $4,000/month · hourly $150 - $199 · projects from $5,000 · 316 claims on file

Evidence for this query6/300.21 B2B SaaS SEO claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Optimum7 grew BSI.com's organic search presence and AI visibility by rebuilding the digital foundation for a B2B payroll compliance… (optimum7.com, claimed)
Fit to this query20.4/250.815Lists Miami as a service region; headquartered in Coral Gables, FL, USA; Retainers from $4,000/month, inside the B2B SaaS SEO band; Best-fit note mentions Miami paid ads fit for buyers who need Google Ads…
Capability depth0.1/150.011 of 87 listed services are SEO services; 1 of 316 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2007; Retention not documented
Transparency10/101Pricing disclosed (From $4,000/month); Team size 10-49; Workflow or reporting cadence documented
Reputation0/50No third-party reviews on file
Market credibility1.3/50.251 recognition with a source on file: ApparelMagic partner; Sources: partners.apparelmagic.com, checked Nov 2026

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.

  • Optimum7 grew BSI.com's organic search presence and AI visibility by rebuilding the digital foundation for a B2B payroll compliance software company, with monthly visitors rising from 140 to 2,250.

    Agency's own words · optimum7.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: BBB. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Best for (profile): SERM, ORM, Community Marketing, Link Building

#8 Jives Media44/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · serves the city from California, USA · price not disclosed · 25 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; A client testimonial from Sarah Johnson, CEO of TechVision Inc., states that Jives Media transformed the company's digital presence and… (jivesmedia.com, claimed); For client Oracle, Jives Media narrowed paid search targeting to higher-ed IT leaders, tailored messaging by institution type and added… (jivesmedia.com, claimed)
Fit to this query12.4/250.495Lists Miami as a service region; headquartered in California, USA; Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth9/150.61 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 2 of 25 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2012; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation5/51191 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • A client testimonial from Sarah Johnson, CEO of TechVision Inc., states that Jives Media transformed the company's digital presence and delivered a 300% increase in qualified leads.

    Agency's own words · jivesmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

  • For client Oracle, Jives Media narrowed paid search targeting to higher-ed IT leaders, tailored messaging by institution type and added proof assets; marketing-qualified leads rose 82%.

    Agency's own words · jivesmedia.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 164 reviews; Trustpilot 4.7 from 27 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#9 Unified Marketing41/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · serves the city from Deerfield Beach, FL, USA · price not disclosed · 39 claims on file

Evidence for this query12/300.42 B2B SaaS SEO claims on file: 0 third-party, 2 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Unified Marketing lists HuntReserve as a SaaS booking and operations platform project. Its page describes a process from inquiry to a… (unifiedmktg.com, claimed); Unified Marketing built a booking and operations platform for client HuntReserve, a SaaS product with 9 pipeline stages and drag-and-drop… (unifiedmktg.com, claimed)
Fit to this query12.4/250.495Lists Miami as a service region; headquartered in Deerfield Beach, FL, USA; Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth8.5/150.5641 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 2 of 39 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability7.2/100.72In business since 2006; Retention not documented
Transparency0/100Pricing not disclosed; Team size not disclosed; Process not documented
Reputation3.1/50.62817 third-party reviews at 5.0
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Unified Marketing lists HuntReserve as a SaaS booking and operations platform project. Its page describes a process from inquiry to a paid, waivered, licensed hunting party and lists 9 pipeline stages and 1 personal link per hunter.

    Agency's own words · unifiedmktg.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

  • Unified Marketing built a booking and operations platform for client HuntReserve, a SaaS product with 9 pipeline stages and drag-and-drop functionality plus a personal link per hunter covering details, license, and waiver. The build let a stranger's inquiry become a paid, waivered, licensed hunting party without a single phone call.

    Agency's own words · unifiedmktg.com · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.8 · describes work · checked Nov 2, 2026

Reviews: Google 5 from 17 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

#10 HQDM40/100 · Moderate confidence 0.8

Published by the agency on its own site · headquarters in the city · price not disclosed · 28 claims on file

Evidence for this query6/300.21 B2B SaaS SEO claim on file: 0 third-party, 1 first-party, 0 profile signals; outside claims from 1 distinct site; Client Jennifer Osgood of designpickle.com reports results within 3 months, with big increases in qualified leads coming through organic. (hqdm.io, claimed)
Fit to this query15.5/250.62Headquartered in Miami (Miami, FL, USA); Pricing not disclosed
Capability depth8.2/150.5451 of 1 listed services are SEO services; 1 of 28 claims on file concern B2B SaaS SEO
Reliability5.4/100.54In business since 2019; Retention not documented
Transparency2.5/100.25Pricing not disclosed; Team size 04; Process not documented
Reputation4.4/50.88475 third-party reviews at 4.7
Market credibility0/50No awards, certifications or media mentions with a source on file

Penalties: Profile below decision-ready status -2 (Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.)

Limits: No independent source names B2B SaaS SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.; Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.; Never verified against official sources.; Profile below decision-ready status: Profile status is ready_for_render_audit.

  • Client Jennifer Osgood of designpickle.com reports results within 3 months, with big increases in qualified leads coming through organic.

    Agency's own words · hqdm.io · claimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed. · weight 0.6 · describes work · checked Nov 1, 2026

Reviews: Google 4.9 from 67 reviews; Trustpilot 3.3 from 8 reviews. Ratings never count as evidence for this question.

Positions 11 to 12: the same breakdown is on each agency's profile, linked from the table above, and in the machine-readable version below.

D2What counts as evidence for this questionRubric 2026.09

A claim counts as B2B SaaS evidence when a source on file names work for a software business: qualified pipeline, demo or trial signups from organic, product-led or bottom-of-funnel content, comparison and alternative pages, integration or use-case pages, or a named SaaS client with a result. Reviews naming pipeline or signups carry the most weight. A Vendar service listing or profile tag never earns a rank on its own.

Terms that count:
b2b saas, saas seo, b2b seo, demo request, demo requests, free trial, trial signups, pipeline, mqls, sqls, qualified leads, product-led, bottom of funnel, comparison page, alternatives page, integration pages, use case pages, software company
Minimum to be ranked:
1 claim on file under this rubric, of which 1 from a source outside Vendar.
Budget band:
no budget band for this question

In plain words: a case counts when it names B2B SaaS SEO work and where it was published can be checked.

D3Eligibility and orderWho is admitted, how ties break, what payment does

Ranked vendors have at least 1 claim on file that supports B2B SaaS SEO under the published rubric, of which at least 1 comes from a source outside Vendar; the rest are listed unranked.

  • The vendor lists the page's service on its profile.
  • The vendor serves the page's market: headquarters or a listed service region in the city. When a need page has fewer than ten ranked vendors from the city, agencies from other cities join it only if they are headquartered in the same state or have published work (a case study, a project, a client review) that names the city or its state. A line saying a company serves the whole country is not enough. They are ranked by the same score, geography counts 0.3 for them, and each position says where the agency works from. Mobile development is bought remotely, so its city pages take agencies from anywhere in the United States under the same condition: documented work for the need. The same holds for SEO needs bought remotely: international, enterprise, consulting, recovery, marketplaces, startups, B2B SaaS, ecommerce, AI search visibility, audits, technical and content-led SEO. Local SEO, small business, lead generation and high-ticket services stay with agencies from the city and its state.
  • A need page that still has fewer than ten ranked agencies after that is filled from the city's own agencies whose sources say they offer the need but document no project for it yet. They always stand below every agency with documented work, are labelled "Offers this service; no documented project on file yet", carry lower confidence, and do not count toward the threshold that opens a page to search engines.
  • For an intent page, at least one claim on file supports the intent under the page's rubric, and at least one of those claims comes from a source outside Vendar. Our own service listings and profile tags describe the intent but document nothing, so they add weight to a vendor that already has outside evidence and never earn a rank on their own. Vendors without outside evidence appear below the ranking, unranked, never padded into it.
  • For an intent page, at least one of those claims documents work the vendor has done: a case study, a project or portfolio entry, or a client review. Service pages, price lists, positioning statements and directory listings say what a vendor offers, not what it did; they add weight to a vendor that already has documented work and never earn a documented position. They can only fill a page that is short of ten, below every documented position and labelled as such (see below).
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site. It is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" until an independent source documents the same kind of work.
  • Filtered views (an entry price, a pricing model, a team size) are not rankings of their own: they show agencies ranked for at least one need in the city, each with the score of its best need, and keep only those that meet the condition. An agency that does not publish the fact is listed below with the reason.
  • Draft and needs-data profiles are never listed.
  • Rank order is the score, highest first. Ties break on evidence points, then on the number of third-party claims, then alphabetically.
  • There is no hidden ordering: no hand-curated slug lists and no paid boost in the sort on any listing.
  • If an editor overrides a position, the position is labelled as an editorial placement with a written reason and ordering_basis set to editorial. No such placements exist on evidence-ranked pages today.
  • Every ranked position explains itself from its score components and cites the claims behind them, with their sources.
  • Sort: score_out_of_100, highest first; ties break on evidence points, then third-party claim count, then name.
  • Payment: Paid visibility never changes the order of a listing.
  • Top-list threshold: An intent page is offered to search engines when its ranked list has at least five evidence-backed vendors (three when the city has fewer than twenty vendors for the service). Only agencies from the city itself (headquarters or a listed service region) with documented work count toward it: agencies filled in from other cities and agencies that only offer the need do not. A page whose list rests mostly on agencies from other cities is titled “agencies serving” the city instead of “best agencies in” it, says how many are local, stays on the city page and in its feed, and is kept out of search engines until enough local agencies document the work; otherwise the same national list would stand behind six city pages. Below the threshold even with outside agencies the page stays published with noindex, keeps its URL, links and feed, and is left out of the city page's list of rankings. A page whose top ten repeats 70% or more of another need's top ten in the same city, or has the same top three, also stays noindex while the stronger of the two is offered; it opens when the lists differ. The same holds across cities: of the pages for one need whose top tens share 70% or more, only the one with the most local agencies is offered to search engines.

Weights: Evidence for this query 30 · Fit to this query 25 · Capability depth 15 · Reliability 10 · Transparency 10 · Reputation 5 · Market credibility 5. Penalties: Profile flagged for review -5 · Evidence not re-checked in 18 months -5 · No independent source on file -3 · Profile below decision-ready status -2.

D4How claims are counted
  • Paid agency directories that sell placement are not a source. Their reviews are not cited, never support a position and do not count toward reputation; a profile may show how many reviews such directories hold as one unnamed figure, for context only. Ratings come from open review platforms: Google, Trustpilot and BBB.
  • Provenance is recorded per claim: third_party, first_party, internal (a Vendar profile field) or unknown.
  • Verification status is recorded per claim: verified, claimed, internal_signal or unverified.
  • Every record on file has a role: a claim states a fact; a source reference is a link without a statement (an official site, a directory profile); a research note is Vendar's own remark. Only claims count as evidence. A source reference never earns weight, however its title reads, and a research note never reaches a page or a feed.
  • Every claim with a source URL is checked against that page by an AI reader and the result is recorded: confirmed, partly confirmed, not supported, or page unreachable. A claim the page does not support stops counting toward any position until a later check confirms it; a claim whose page cannot be read still counts and says so.
  • Third-party claims outweigh first-party claims; profile fields are the weakest signal and are labelled as such.
  • A position may rest on case studies the agency published on its own site; such a position is admitted and labelled "Published by the agency on its own site" on the listing, the profile and the feed (evidence_basis: own_published) until an independent source documents the same kind of work. Its confidence is at most moderate.
  • In the ranking, who is speaking is decided by the source address: the vendor's own site and platforms where the vendor publishes about itself (platform partner directories and portals, case-study hosting sites, paid release wires) are the vendor's own word, not an independent source, whatever domain they sit on. Client reviews on a partner directory stay third-party.
  • On the profile and in its feed the rule is stricter: who is speaking is decided by who wrote the text. Every claim falls into one of four classes: independent (a client, the press, a rating written by a third party); linked to the agency (a person who worked at or through it, writing in the first person); a listing the agency writes (the platforms above, or another page retelling what the agency says); and the agency itself. Only the first class counts as independent there (section 18).
  • A claim counts for an intent only when the rubric's terms appear in the claim or its source. The rubric is published on the page.
  • Claims that only describe the company's location or history are not intent evidence.
  • Each claim is marked by whether it documents work (describes_work in the machine feed): case studies, projects, portfolio entries and client reviews do; service pages, pricing, positioning statements, review-platform profiles and employer reviews do not.
  • Claims from the same source count with diminishing weight: each further claim adds half as much as the one before it. Everything an agency says about itself, on any page, is one source; outside documents are told apart by the site that published them. The number of reviews on one platform, or of pages on an agency's own site, cannot carry a position.
  • Evidence documented on two or more different independent sites earns a small bonus over the same amount of evidence from one site.
  • Review platforms that compete with Vendar stay in the machine feed with their source URL, because a claim must be checkable, but pages do not name or link them; where other sources exist, they are listed first.

Verified means Vendar confirmed the company, its service and its market on official sources and stamped the profile with the date. A participation status or a partner relationship does not make a profile verified.

D5Dates and versions
Data as of
Nov 3, 2026
Newest evidence check
Nov 3, 2026
Feed generated
Nov 4, 2026
Ranking model
Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
Rubric
B2B SaaS SEO 2026.09
Update cadence
Fast signals, monthly: licence status, site alive, review rating and count, pricing pages, team page. Evidence, each base cycle: case studies, portfolio, services, client types, press and awards. Full re-verification, yearly: registry, address, ownership, every claim a rank rests on. Event-driven, within days: a vendor update, a buyer report, a dead link, a regulator record, a dispute.
Next evidence pass due by
Feb 1, 2027

Every date shown is a data date. A listing's updated date is the newest verification date among its ranked vendors and the evidence claims their ranks rest on; the same value appears in the page text, the structured data and the machine feed.

D6Known limits of the method

A position reflects documented work for the page's question, not the quality of an agency as such. Without a public case or a visible campaign the result of an agency's work cannot be known from outside. An agency with no public evidence is not worse: there is nothing to confirm it with, so it is listed below the ranking instead of being ranked low.

  • About 20 of 100 points rest on what the vendor says about itself without an outside check: years in business, team size, retention, prices.
  • The weights favour older, larger and local vendors: full marks at ten years and around 100 reviews, awards count toward market credibility, a vendor that works remotely gets 0.3 on geography, an undisclosed price gets 0.2.
  • The weights 30/25/15/10/10/5/5 are set by judgment and are not yet calibrated on client outcomes.
  • Reviews on directories are often collected by the agency itself.
  • The ranking decides who is speaking by the source address only: a person who worked at or through the agency writing on their own site, or a third-party page retelling what the agency says, still counts as third-party in a position. The profile and its feed already count them as the agency's word, so a position can show more third-party claims than the profile shows independent ones.
  • Market credibility counts recognition with a source on file, including recognition the vendor reports about itself.
  • Claims are checked by AI models, not by people. Code confirms that the quoted words are on the page; it cannot confirm that the page itself tells the truth. A case study on an agency's own site stays the agency's word even when the check confirms it.
  • Confidence is shown next to the score and does not change the order.
D7Machine-readable version

This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.

/ai/listings/marketing/seo/miami/b2b-saas

Schema vendar.ai.decision.v1 · Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7 · generated Nov 4, 2026 · methodology /scoring

Miami buyer context

What B2B SaaS SEO has to do differently

The buyer is a committee and the journey ends in a demo or a trial, not a cart. Comparison, alternative and use-case pages carry that traffic, and the work has to survive the product changing under it.

Fit
  • Writes for evaluators, not for a general audience: comparisons, alternatives, use cases.
  • Connects organic sessions to pipeline in your CRM, not to a goal in analytics.
  • Can keep pages honest when the product or pricing changes.
Proof
  • Which page type produced demo requests, and how many?
  • How do you attribute a self-serve signup to organic?
  • What happens to the content plan when we reposition?
Budget
  • Ranked here and disclosing a monthly minimum: 5, from $500 to $4K.
  • Middle of that range: about $2K a month.
  • 7 of the 12 ranked agencies do not publish a minimum; ask on the first call.