Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #21 Local SEO in Miami, of 24 · also in 1 more ranking
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
on Google5.0/55 reviews as of Nov 2, 2026- 100% written in the last 12 months
- 0% rate it 3 stars or lower
- 0% of Google reviews answered
Clients consistently praise the agency for local SEO and Google Business Profile work that improved rankings, visibility, and calls. No review criticises the agency. The positive reviews are consistent across Google and agency published testimonials.More
- Local SEO and Google Business Profile optimization5
- Clear communication and smooth process1
- Transparent reporting1
“Their Google Business Profile optimization and local search engine optimization strategies really stood out.”
Show 2 more quotesHide quotes
“The whole process was smooth, no runaround, and they actually explained what they were doing.”
“the reporting is genuinely transparent.”
No criticism in the 4 reviews read.
- Local SEO5
- Google Business Profile optimization3
- SEO2
- Local business
- Law firm
- Roofing contractor
- Restaurant
Show 3 named client quotesHide named client quotes
“We went from page 3 to the top of Google for our top keywords in five months. Our phone hasn't stopped ringing since.”
“Best SEO decision we've made. They doubled our organic traffic and the reporting is genuinely transparent.”
“These folks understand Miami's market. Local SEO brought us real walk-in customers, not just clicks.”
- Your business looks like the reviewers': local business; law firm; roofing contractor.
- You need what reviewers hired it for: Local SEO (5 of 10 mentions); Google Business Profile optimization (3).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Several commercial terms are not published.
- Ask for the hourly rate, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #20 Raging Agency39Ranks above on this question#20#21 this oneScore3939Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #22 AMM Firm38Ranks below on this question#22#21 this oneScore3839Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for X Miami SEO Company.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#21 Local SEO in Miami: 39/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 8 | 27% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 15.5 | 62% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.2 | 68% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparencyweakest | 10 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Reputation | 5 | 1.9 | 38% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 2.5 | 50% |
|
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 6 on file · 0 of 3 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 6 claims on file: independent source 3 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 3. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 4 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Lead Generation 1 · Local SEO 1. The full ledger of 6 is on the proof page.
A client review from Maria Alvarez, Owner of Alvarez & Co. Law, states the vendor took the firm from page 3 to the top of Google for its top keywords in five months, after which phone inquiries increased.
Agency's own wordsxmiamiseocompany.shopclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
We went from page 3 to the top of Google for our top keywords in five months. Our phone hasn't stopped ringing since.
A client review from James Carter, Founder of Carter Roofing, states the vendor doubled the company's organic traffic and that reporting was transparent.
Agency's own wordsxmiamiseocompany.shopclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Best SEO decision we've made. They doubled our organic traffic and the reporting is genuinely transparent.
A client review from Sofia Reyes, Marketing Director of Bayfront Bistro, states local SEO brought the restaurant walk-in customers.
Agency's own wordsxmiamiseocompany.shopclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 1, 2026describes workLocal SEOQuote from the source page
These folks understand Miami's market. Local SEO brought us real walk-in customers, not just clicks.
The Miami SEO Company states that all employees are Google Analytics & Adwords certified.
Independent sourcemarkitors.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026Quote from the source page
Moreover, all employees are Google Analytics & Adwords certified.
The Miami SEO Company is listed as a Google Partner agency, and its campaign managers hold Google Ads and Google Analytics certifications.
Independent sourceontoplist.comverified: Checked against the source page by Vendar.quote confirmed, checked Nov 2, 2026Quote from the source page
Market exclusivity is the main draw at The Miami SEO Company, a Google Partner agency. ... Its campaign managers hold Google Ads and Google Analytics certifications.
Positions in every ranking2 rankings
2 positions: 2 where a claim on file names the need, 0 listed on offer only. The top 2 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local SEO · Miamion its own published cases | #21 of 24 | 39 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
| SEO for Lead Generation · Miamion its own published cases | #27 of 28 | 37 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Transparency 0 of 10 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Miami, FL, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Miami, FL, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- not statedVendar profile field
- Industries
- not statedVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- Alvarez & Co. Law, Carter Roofing, Bayfront BistroIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- 1 month (month to month)
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
The Local SEO band tops out at $6,000/month; this vendor does not publish a monthly floor.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: Local SEO $2,000 (11 of 24 disclose) · SEO for Lead Generation $2,500 (15 of 28 disclose)
Reputation
- Google5 · 5 reviews
How it counts: 5 third-party reviews at 5.0. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- The Miami SEO Company states that all employees are Google Analytics & Adwords certified., The Miami SEO Company is listed as a Google Partner agency, and its campaign managers hold Google Ads and Google Analytics certifications.
Company and process
Founding year, team size and working process are not disclosed.
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, team size, logo10/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types: industries, client types5/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, setup fee3/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 3 work claims3/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews; Google: too few reviews to count0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 3 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 6 with a source21/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 613/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names local SEO work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 3 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 3 of 6 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 3 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: Every claim has an observation date (5 of 6)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 3 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing, team size missing)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 2, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.