Admitted to a ranking on documented work, outside the top three for every question it appears in. None of its 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source.
Best position #6 SEO for Lead Generation in Seattle, of 10 · also in 11 more rankings
Why: Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
Opens in your own account with a ready question and a link to the same data. Nothing about you is sent.
- Your business matches the client types on file (B2B companies, SaaS companies, ecommerce brands) and the industries on file (ecommerce, saas, local services).
- You need a published price before the first call: nothing is disclosed.
No documented work claim comes from an independent source yet.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- Few outside reviews mention SEO for Lead Generation work specifically.
- Ask for the hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: not published.
- Ask for two client references you can call: no independent accounts of its work on file.
- Ask which case is closest to your business and what the measured result was: no proof on file carries a number.
- #5 Bellevue SEO Company37Ranks above on this question#5#6 this oneScore3736Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
- #7 Actuate Media35Ranks below on this question#7#6 this oneScore3536Independent00Pricenot disclosednot disclosedModerate confidence · own published cases · Not verified
All detailsEverything behind the summary above: the same data the machine feed serves for Seattle PPC Agency.Open ↓Close ↑
Score by criterion#6 SEO for Lead Generation in Seattle: 36/100
| Criterion | Weight | Points | Share | What it rests on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence for this query | 30 | 6 | 20% |
|
| Fit to this query | 25 | 19 | 76% |
|
| Capability depth | 15 | 10.6 | 71% |
|
| Reliability | 10 | 3 | 30% |
|
| Transparency | 10 | 2.5 | 25% |
|
| Reputationweakest | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
| Market credibility | 5 | 0 | 0% |
|
- -3 No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- -2 Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
All claims in the feed5 of 5 on file · 0 of 5 work claims from an independent source
Who says it, across all 5 claims on file: independent source 0 · linked to the agency 0 · listings the agency writes 0 · agency's own words 5. Independent share of work claims: 0%. 1 distinct source pages.
Claims per need in this feed: SEO for Marketplaces 1 · Local SEO 1 · SEO for Lead Generation 1. The full ledger of 5 is on the proof page.
Seattle PPC Agency strengthened the technical foundation and revitalized the visual user experience for TONL, a stock photo marketplace.
Agency's own wordsseattleppcagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workSEO for MarketplacesQuote from the source page
Strengthened the technical foundation and revitalized the visual user experience for this diverse stock photo marketplace.
Seattle PPC Agency used WordPress development and local SEO optimization to drive local leads for Sacramento Plumbing Solutions.
Agency's own wordsseattleppcagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workLocal SEOSEO for Lead GenerationQuote from the source page
Drove local leads through expert WordPress development and local SEO optimization.
Seattle PPC Agency delivered a digital growth strategy for Beometry that included WordPress design, SEO, and content creation.
Agency's own wordsseattleppcagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Delivered a holistic digital growth strategy for this health brand, encompassing WordPress design, SEO, and content creation.
Seattle PPC Agency developed a brand identity and WordPress website for Stebbins CPA.
Agency's own wordsseattleppcagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Developed a professional brand identity and high-trust WordPress website for this established accounting firm.
Seattle PPC Agency provided SeedSystem with technical WordPress development and an SEO-focused content plan to boost the SaaS company’s digital reach.
Agency's own wordsseattleppcagency.comclaimed: Recorded as the source states it; not independently confirmed.quote confirmed, checked Nov 3, 2026describes workQuote from the source page
Boosted this SaaS company’s digital reach through technical WordPress development and a robust SEO-focused content plan.
Positions in every ranking12 rankings
12 positions: 11 where a claim on file names the need, 1 listed on offer only. The top 5 by evidence first; the rest open below.
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Lead Generation · Seattleon its own published cases | #6 of 10 | 36 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| Local SEO · Seattleon its own published cases | #10 of 12 | 35 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · New Yorkon its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Phoenixon its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Dallason its own published cases | #46 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
7 more positionsHide the other 7
| Ranking | Rank | Score | Claims for the need | Confidence | Weakest criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO for Marketplaces · Miamion its own published cases | #46 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Seattleon its own published cases | #30 of 53 | 38 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Houstonon its own published cases | #44 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Atlantaon its own published cases | #45 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · Chicagoon its own published cases | #45 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO for Marketplaces · San Franciscoon its own published cases | #45 of 53 | 29 | 1 (0 independent) | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
| SEO Agencies with an In-house Team · Seattlelisted on offer only: no claim on file names this need | #2 of 2 | 38 | 0 | Moderate confidence | Reputation 0 of 5 |
Fit and geography
- Headquarters
- Seattle, WA, USAAgency's own words
- Service regions
- Seattle, WA, USAVendar profile field
- Client types
- b2b, saas, ecommerce, local_service_businessVendar profile field
- Industries
- Ecommerce, SaaS, Local Services, B2BVendar profile field
- Named clients in confirmed proof
- TONL, Sacramento Plumbing Solutions, Beometry, Stebbins CPA, SeedSystemIndependent source or agency, see the claims list
Only rows marked “Verified by Vendar” were checked. Rankings place an agency in a city by headquarters or by documented work for clients there, never by a service region alone.
Pricing in fullNot disclosed
- Model
- not disclosed
- Minimum monthly budget
- not disclosed
- Project minimum
- not disclosed
- Hourly rate
- not disclosed
- Typical range
- not disclosed
- Minimum term
- not disclosed
- Setup fee
- not disclosed
- Engagement models
- not stated
Source: Not disclosed. Every figure above is the agency's published number; a row marked not disclosed has no published figure.
Median disclosed monthly floor in each ranking: SEO for Lead Generation $750 (3 of 10 disclose) · Local SEO $750 (6 of 12 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO Agencies with an In-house Team n/a (0 of 2 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose) · SEO for Marketplaces $3,000 (27 of 53 disclose)
Reputation
No review platforms on file.
How it counts: No third-party reviews on file. Ratings say nothing about work on a specific need and never count as evidence for it.
- Awards
- none on file
- Certifications
- none on file
Company and process
- Founded
- not disclosedNot disclosed
- Team size
- 300+Agency's own words
- Languages
- not statedVendar profile field
- Services
- SEOVendar profile field
- Technologies
- not statedVendar profile field
- Workflow
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Onboarding
- not documentedAgency's own words
- Reporting
- not documentedAgency's own words
Company fields come from the vendor profile; only fields with status verified were checked by Vendar.
How confidence is computedLower confidence
- Confidence
- Lower confidence, 62 of 100
- Evidence posture
- thin: No independent source documents this vendor's work; treat it as a candidate only.
- Capped by
- Rated from the evidence on file (sources, independence, confirmed quotes), not by an editor.
- Best position confidence
- Moderate confidence
It starts from the data completeness and source reliability of the profile, and is capped when independent proof of work is thin. The next level is Moderate confidence. One independent claim with a measured result for the best-ranked need is the fastest way up.
- Who the company is: website, headquarters, founding year, team size, logo, regions served: founding year, logo14/20
- Fit: services, industries, client types15/15
- Commercial terms: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee: model, entry price, hourly rate, minimum term, setup fee0/20
- Documented work: cases naming a client and a result (target 5) and work claims overall (target 10): 0 cases with a named client and a result, 5 work claims5/30
- Reputation: rating and review count on two or more platforms, each with 10 or more reviews: 0 platforms with a rating and 10 or more reviews0/15
- Who is speaking: independent sources among work claims (full marks at 40%): 0 of 5 work claims are independent0/30
- Checked against the source page: confirmed, or half for partly confirmed: 5 confirmed, 0 partly, of 5 with a source25/25
- Numbers backed by a verbatim quote from the source: 0 of 020/20
- Seen within the last 365 days: 5 of 515/15
- Not contradicted: claims their source no longer supports: 0 not supported by their page10/10
These two scores describe the profile itself and never change a position.
Limits and how to correct them
- No independent source names SEO for lead generation work; the evidence is first-party or editorial.
- Pricing not disclosed; budget fit cannot be checked before outreach.
- Never verified against official sources.
- No independent source on file: Every claim on file is first-party or a Vendar profile field.
- Profile below decision-ready status: the profile is collected but not reviewed yet.
- Use as a caveated candidate only: no independent source documents this vendor's work.
- None of the 5 documented work claims comes from an independent source; all are the agency's own account or sources it controls.
- No third-party evidence claims are normalized.
- Only one external source URL is exposed.
- Best position rests on: Published by the agency on its own site.
- 5 of 5 claims on file are the agency's own words or sources it controls; 0 come from an independent source.
- Open: Price signal disclosed (not disclosed; asked in Before you sign)
- Open: Three strongest proofs name a client and a measured, dated result (0 of 3)
- Open: At least a third of documented work comes from independent sources (0 of 5 work claims)
- Open: Founding year, team size and headquarters on file (founding year missing)
- Open: Citation sources point outside Vendar and read as labels (1 sources, 0 self-citations, 0 code labels)
Machine-readable version
This section carries the same data that AI assistants receive.
- Schema
- vendar.ai.vendor-summary.v1
- Model
- Evidence-weighted ranking 2026.11.7
- Data as of
- Nov 3, 2026
- Generated
- Verification
- Not verified
- Sources checked
- not yet
- Citation readiness
- Candidate only, with a caveat
- Do not infer headquarters from service-area coverage.
- Do not treat paid visibility as organic ranking proof.
- Do not present a source-thin profile as independently verified.
Describe what you need. The request is saved in Vendar first, then routed from there.